Anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from pulmonary artery a late presentation—Case report and review of literature

AbstractAn otherwise healthy 26-year-old female presented with sudden cardiac arrest. She was resuscitated with unsynchronized cardioversion for ventricular fibrillation. A left heart cardiac catheterization showed anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (ALCAPA). Cardiac computed tomographic angiography confirmed this abnormality. She underwent direct translocation of the left main coronary artery to the aorta, and after a stormy postoperative course was discharged home.ALCAPA is a rare congenital abnormality of the coronary system that is associated with early infant mortality and adult sudden death. The use of advanced cardiac imaging has resulted in an increase in the number of diagnosed ALCAPA cases, especially in the adult population, sometimes even in the asymptomatic. The extent of collateral circulation that develops between the right coronary artery and the left coronary artery determines the outcome; the more collateral circulation there is, the less the hypoxic damage to the ventricle. This not only informs us that people survive ALCAPA into adulthood but also highlights the importance for adult cardiologists to be aware of this interesting disease. Corrective surgery remains the treatment of choice. We present a rare case of ALCAPA, with first presentation in adulthood in the form of a malignant ventricular arrhythmia.<Learning objective: Anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (ALCAPA) is a rare congenital abnormality of the coronary system that is associated with early infant mortality and adult sudden death. Hence we feel it is most important to be aware of this entity, especially as the incidence of diagnosed ALCAPA is on the rise in adulthood. Also the images provided and the discussion have high educational value for generalists and cardiologists alike.

Relationship between glycemic status and progression of carotid intima-media thickness during treatment with combined statin and extended-release niacin in ARBITER 2

Allen J Taylor, Daming Zhu, Lance E Sullenberger, Hyun J Lee, Jeannie K Lee, Karen A Grace Cardiology Service, Walter Reed Army Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA Background: We previously reported in a placebo-controlled study that extended-release niacin slowed the progression of carotid atherosclerosis when added to statin monotherapy. This analysis examines the relationship between glycemic status and the effects of niacin on common carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT) and HDL cholesterol.Methods: Post-hoc, subgroup analysis of ARBITER 2, a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of once-daily extended-release niacin (1000 mg) added to background statin therapy in 167 patients (mean age 67 years) with known coronary heart disease. The primary analysis was a comparison of the primary endpoint, the change in CIMT, between participants with either normal glycemic status, diabetes mellitus (DM) or the metabolic syndrome (MS).Results: Baseline cardiovascular risk variables were significantly worse in those with abnormal glycemic status, particularly among subjects with MS. Niacin increased HDL-C to a similar degree (~20%) across normals, DM and MS. Placebo-treated patients had the greatest CIMT progression, regardless of glycemic status. The lowest progression rate was observed in niacin treated patients with normal glycemic status. Among all niacin treated subjects, there was a significant linear relationship between change in CIMT and change in HDL-C (r = &ndash;0.16; p = 0.05), which was of similar magnitude in subgroups with normal glycemic status (r = &ndash;0.23; p = 0.08) and DM (r = &ndash;0.22; p = 0.17). In those with MS, there was no relationship between changes in HDL and CIMT, (r = 0.11; p = 0.44), whereas blood glucose was positive correlated to change in CIMT (r = 0.30; p = 0.04). In multivariable linear models controlling for MS characteristics and blood glucose changes, only the change in HDL independently predicted change in CIMT.Conclusions: During niacin treatment, increases in HDL-C are related to changes in CIMT in the setting of both normal glycemic status and diabetes mellitus.Keywords: atherosclerosis, risk factors, lipids, diabetes mellitu

Impact of atherosclerosis imaging-quantitative computed tomography on diagnostic certainty, downstream testing, coronary revascularization, and medical therapy: the CERTAIN study.

AIMS: The incremental impact of atherosclerosis imaging-quantitative computed tomography (AI-QCT) on diagnostic certainty and downstream patient management is not yet known. The aim of this study was to compare the clinical utility of the routine implementation of AI-QCT versus conventional visual coronary CT angiography (CCTA) interpretation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multi-centre cross-over study in 5 expert CCTA sites, 750 consecutive adult patients referred for CCTA were prospectively recruited. Blinded to the AI-QCT analysis, site physicians established patient diagnoses and plans for downstream non-invasive testing, coronary intervention, and medication management based on the conventional site assessment. Next, physicians were asked to repeat their assessments based upon AI-QCT results. The included patients had an age of 63.8 ± 12.2 years; 433 (57.7%) were male. Compared with the conventional site CCTA evaluation, AI-QCT analysis improved physicians confidence two- to five-fold at every step of the care pathway and was associated with change in diagnosis or management in the majority of patients (428; 57.1%; P &lt; 0.001), including for measures such as Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) (295; 39.3%; P &lt; 0.001) and plaque burden (197; 26.3%; P &lt; 0.001). After AI-QCT including ischaemia assessment, the need for downstream non-invasive and invasive testing was reduced by 37.1% (P &lt; 0.001), compared with the conventional site CCTA evaluation. Incremental to the site CCTA evaluation alone, AI-QCT resulted in statin initiation/increase an aspirin initiation in an additional 28.1% (P &lt; 0.001) and 23.0% (P &lt; 0.001) of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: The use of AI-QCT improves diagnostic certainty and may result in reduced downstream need for non-invasive testing and increased rates of preventive medical therapy

Health-status outcomes with invasive or conservative care in coronary disease

BACKGROUND In the ISCHEMIA trial, an invasive strategy with angiographic assessment and revascularization did not reduce clinical events among patients with stable ischemic heart disease and moderate or severe ischemia. A secondary objective of the trial was to assess angina-related health status among these patients. METHODS We assessed angina-related symptoms, function, and quality of life with the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at randomization, at months 1.5, 3, and 6, and every 6 months thereafter in participants who had been randomly assigned to an invasive treatment strategy (2295 participants) or a conservative strategy (2322). Mixed-effects cumulative probability models within a Bayesian framework were used to estimate differences between the treatment groups. The primary outcome of this health-status analysis was the SAQ summary score (scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health status). All analyses were performed in the overall population and according to baseline angina frequency. RESULTS At baseline, 35% of patients reported having no angina in the previous month. SAQ summary scores increased in both treatment groups, with increases at 3, 12, and 36 months that were 4.1 points (95% credible interval, 3.2 to 5.0), 4.2 points (95% credible interval, 3.3 to 5.1), and 2.9 points (95% credible interval, 2.2 to 3.7) higher with the invasive strategy than with the conservative strategy. Differences were larger among participants who had more frequent angina at baseline (8.5 vs. 0.1 points at 3 months and 5.3 vs. 1.2 points at 36 months among participants with daily or weekly angina as compared with no angina). CONCLUSIONS In the overall trial population with moderate or severe ischemia, which included 35% of participants without angina at baseline, patients randomly assigned to the invasive strategy had greater improvement in angina-related health status than those assigned to the conservative strategy. The modest mean differences favoring the invasive strategy in the overall group reflected minimal differences among asymptomatic patients and larger differences among patients who had had angina at baseline

Initial invasive or conservative strategy for stable coronary disease

BACKGROUND Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, whether clinical outcomes are better in those who receive an invasive intervention plus medical therapy than in those who receive medical therapy alone is uncertain. METHODS We randomly assigned 5179 patients with moderate or severe ischemia to an initial invasive strategy (angiography and revascularization when feasible) and medical therapy or to an initial conservative strategy of medical therapy alone and angiography if medical therapy failed. The primary outcome was a composite of death from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest. A key secondary outcome was death from cardiovascular causes or myocardial infarction. RESULTS Over a median of 3.2 years, 318 primary outcome events occurred in the invasive-strategy group and 352 occurred in the conservative-strategy group. At 6 months, the cumulative event rate was 5.3% in the invasive-strategy group and 3.4% in the conservative-strategy group (difference, 1.9 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.8 to 3.0); at 5 years, the cumulative event rate was 16.4% and 18.2%, respectively (difference, 121.8 percentage points; 95% CI, 124.7 to 1.0). Results were similar with respect to the key secondary outcome. The incidence of the primary outcome was sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction; a secondary analysis yielded more procedural myocardial infarctions of uncertain clinical importance. There were 145 deaths in the invasive-strategy group and 144 deaths in the conservative-strategy group (hazard ratio, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.32). CONCLUSIONS Among patients with stable coronary disease and moderate or severe ischemia, we did not find evidence that an initial invasive strategy, as compared with an initial conservative strategy, reduced the risk of ischemic cardiovascular events or death from any cause over a median of 3.2 years. The trial findings were sensitive to the definition of myocardial infarction that was used