519 research outputs found

    Thinking Locally First

    Get PDF

    Growth Not Gotcha: The Power of Feedback for Future-Readiness of Teacher Candidates

    Get PDF
    Feedback is powerful. Everybody needs feedback. The need for feedback includes teachers. It’s time to transform delivery of instruction and teacher-education with a powerful, 2-step observation-feedback process. Clarity of expectations set the stage for observation. Feedback is delivered instantaneously and regularly. Actionable feedback gets results including growth from self-reflection, collaborative conversation, and differentiated professional learning. Self-efficacy of teacher candidates soars and retention in the profession finally has a fighting chance. Feedback, the breakfast of champions (Blanchard, 2015) gives teachers dollops (Marzano, 2007). Feedback, the missing piece in continuous improvement (Feldman, 2016) and preparation of future-ready teacher candidates

    Electronic Observation: 21st Century Model for Excellence in Teaching and Learning

    Get PDF
    Assessing effective instruction, in support of student achievement is a requirement for institutional accreditation. Simultaneously, considering overall student success, “among school-related factors, teachers matter most” (Teachers Matter, n.a.). If education was a jigsaw puzzle, a missing piece is a strategic method of observing teachers to support institutional effectiveness. A system to monitor practice and expected outcomes; to generate dynamic data that drive decision-making; and to ensure program standards are met in a continuous improvement model (Cervone & Martinez-Miller, 2007; Downey et al., 2004). Walk-through observation is that system, a powerful and intentional missing puzzle piece (Glasgow, et.al., 2014

    Digital Observation of Teacher Candidates: InTASC Accountability for CAEP

    Get PDF
    Teacher preparation programs want to ensure accountability to InTASC and CAEP standard while simultaneously maximizing gains in the quality of instruction delivered by teacher candidates. The solution, research­-based, digital observation to monitor classroom practice with expected outcomes; generate real­time data for self­ reflection and collaborative dialogue; and deliver instantaneous feedback for growth and continuous improvement. The research is clear. The number one factor affecting student learning is quality of teaching (“Teachers Matter,” 2012). The number one factor affecting quality of teaching is instructional conversations (Danielson, 2009). Instructional conversations must be based on data. The Digital eWalkThrough System generates these data

    Who gets the gametes? An argument for a points system for fertility patients

    Get PDF
    This paper argues that the convention of allocating donated gametes on a “first come, first served” basis should be replaced with an allocation sys-tem that takes into account more morally relevant criteria than waiting time. This conclusion was developed using an empirical bioethics method-ology, which involved a study of the views of eighteen staff members from seven UK fertility clinics, and twenty academics, policy-makers, representa-tives of patient groups, and other relevant professionals, on the allocation of donated sperm and eggs. Against these views, we consider some nu-anced ways of including criteria in a points allocation system. We argue that such a system is more ethically robust than “first come, first served”, but we acknowledge that our results suggest that a points system will meet with resistance from those working in the field. We conclude that criteria such as a patient’s age, potentially damaging substance use, and parental status should be used to allocate points and determine which patients re-ceive treatment and in what order. These and other factors should be ap-plied according to how they bear on considerations like child welfare, pa-tient welfare, and the effectiveness of the proposed treatment

    Measuring nursing workload: a cautionary tale

    Get PDF
    The need to develop methods of measuring nursing workload is not new, but the search for accurate measures to calculate the demand for nursing has assumed greater significance in recent years owing to the advent of resource management and the necessity to manage efficiently the most costly resource in the NHS; that of nursing. Currently there are 23 Nurse Management Systems available to choose from and of these, some are ward nurse tracking systems/nurse deployment or rostering systems, some are designed to provide workload requirements, and others, which tend to be those introduced most recently, serve a care-planning function. This paper examines the methodologies and instruments used for measuring nursing workload and describes the rationale for selecting four Nursing Workload Management Systems (NWMs) for review. Integral to every NWM calculation is a series of parameters or assumptions. These parameters are derived, in most cases, from the results of activity analysis undertaken at the site where the chosen NWM is being implemented. The choice of basic parameters appropriate to individual wards/units is a crucial factor in the derivation of workload estimates and the financial consequences of these choices can range from £28,000 to £64,000 per annum per ward. There is general agreement that efficient nursing utilisation is becoming increasingly urgent in the “new” NHS. Whilst the reliability of all NWM systems is being questioned in the USA, criticism of NWM systems in the UK tends to be confined to certain aspects of a particular system or approach rather than to workload measurement as a whole. This UK perspective must be widened by the recognition of the fundamental weaknesses of reliability and consistency of NWM systems.nursing, workload

    Australian perspective regarding recommendations for physical activity and exercise rehabilitation in pulmonary arterial hypertension

    Get PDF
    Aim: To determine the opinion of health care professionals within Australia, regarding acceptable levels of exertion and symptoms, and referral for exercise rehabilitation in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Method: In 2010, 76 health care professionals at a specialist pulmonary hypertension meeting in Australia were surveyed using a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire included case studies of patients with PAH in World Health Organization (WHO) functional classes II–IV. For each case study, respondents were asked to report their opinion regarding the acceptable level of exertion and symptoms during daily activities, and whether they would refer the patient for exercise rehabilitation. Three additional questions asked about advice in relation to four specific physical activities. Results: The response rate was 70% (n = 53). Overall, 58% of respondents recommended patients undertake daily activities 'as tolerated'. There was no consensus regarding acceptable levels of breathlessness or fatigue, but the majority of respondents considered patients should have no chest pain (73%) and no more than mild light-headedness (92%) during daily activities. Overall, 63% of respondents would have referred patients for exercise rehabilitation. There was little difference in opinion regarding the acceptable level of exertion or symptoms, or referral for exercise rehabilitation, according to functional class. However, the patients' functional class did influence the advice given regarding the specific physical activities. Conclusion: In 2010, there were inconsistencies between individual health care professionals within Australia regarding appropriate levels of physical exertion and acceptable symptoms during daily activities. Almost two-thirds of the respondents reported they would refer patients for exercise rehabilitation
    • …
    corecore