250 research outputs found

    A Portfolio Approach to NLOS and Multipath Mitigation in Dense Urban Areas

    Get PDF
    Non-line-of-sight (NLOS) reception and multipath interference are major causes of poor GNSS positioning accuracy in dense urban environments. They are commonly grouped together. However, both the mechanisms by which they cause position errors and many of the techniques for mitigating those errors are quite different [1]. For example, correlation-based multipath mitigation has no effect on the errors caused by NLOS reception. University College London (UCL) has investigated the performance of a number of multipath and/or NLOS mitigation techniques in dense urban areas, including C/N0-based solution weighting [2], advanced consistency checking [3], dual-polarization NLOS detection [4] and vector tracking [5]. In this paper, we present a new multipath detection technique based on comparing the measured C/N0 on multiple frequencies and also new dual-polarization results. Meanwhile, other researchers have demonstrated NLOS detection using a panoramic camera [6, 7] or 3D city model [8, 9] and detection of NLOS and multipath using an antenna array [10]. All of these techniques bring some improvement in positioning performance in urban environments, but none of them eliminate the effects of both NLOS reception and multipath interference completely. As the different techniques are largely complementary, best performance is obtained by using several of them in combination, a portfolio approach. This paper comprises three parts. The first presents a feasibility study on a new multipath detection technique using multi-frequency C/N0 measurements. Constructive multipath interference results in an increase in the measured C/N0, whereas destructive multipath interference results in a decrease. As the phase of a reflected signal with respect to its directly received counterpart depends on the wavelength, the multipath interference may be constructive on one frequency and destructive on another. Thus, by comparing the difference in measured C/N0 between two frequencies with what would normally be expected for that signal at that elevation angle, strong multipath interference may be detected. However, the converse is not true because, depending on the path delay, the phase of the multipath interference may also be consistent across the two frequencies. Consistency across three frequencies in the presence of multipath interference is much less likely than consistency across two. Therefore, by comparing C/N0 measured across three (or more) frequencies, the chance of detection is improved substantially, noting that reliability is less critical as part of a portfolio approach to multipath detection than for a stand-alone technique. Experimental results are presented demonstrating the potential of this approach using GPS and GLONASS data collected in Central London. The second part of the paper presents the results of the first multi-constellation test of the dual-polarization NLOS detection technique pioneered at UCL [4]. This separately correlates the right hand circularly polarized (RHCP) and left hand circularly polarized (LHCP) outputs of a dual-polarization antenna and differences the resulting C/N0 measurements, producing a result that is positive for directly received signals and negative for most NLOS signals. Data was collected at six different sites in Central London and NLOS reception of both GPS and GLONASS signals was detected. Position solutions with the NLOS signals removed are compared with the corresponding all-satellite solutions. The final part of the paper addresses the portfolio approach to NLOS and multipath mitigation. Each technique is assessed qualitatively for its ease of implementation and its efficiency at detecting or directly mitigating both NLOS reception and multipath mitigation. A compatibility matrix is then presented showing which techniques may be combined without conflict. Suitable portfolios are then proposed both for professional-grade and for consumer-grade user equipment. References [1] Groves, P. D., Principles of GNSS, inertial, and multi-sensor integrated navigation systems, Second Edition, Artech House, 2013. [2] Jiang, Z., P. Groves, W. Y. Ochieng, S. Feng, C. D. Milner, and P. G. Mattos, “Multi-Constellation GNSS Multipath Mitigation Using Consistency Checking,” Proc. ION GNSS 2011. [3] Jiang, Z., and P. Groves, “GNSS NLOS and Multipath Error Mitigation using Advanced Multi-Constellation Consistency Checking with Height Aiding,” Proc. ION GNSS 2012. [4] Jiang, Z., and P. D. Groves, “NLOS GPS Signal Detection Using A Dual-Polarisation Antenna,” GPS Solutions, 2012, DOI: 10.1007/s10291-012-0305-5. [5] Hsu, L.-T., P. D. Groves, and S.-S. Jan, “Assessment of the Multipath Mitigation Effect of Vector Tracking in an Urban Environment,” Proc ION Pacific PNT, 2013. [6] Marais, J., M. Berbineau, and M. Heddebaut, “Land Mobile GNSS Availability and Multipath Evaluation Tool,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, Vol. 54, No. 5, 2005, pp. 1697-1704. [7] Meguro, J., et al., “GPS Multipath Mitigation for Urban Area Using Omnidirectional Infrared Camera,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2009, pp. 22-30. [8] Obst, M., S. Bauer, and G. Wanielik, “Urban Multipath Detection and mitigation with Dynamic 3D Maps for Reliable Land Vehicle Localization,” Proc. IEEE/ION PLANS 2012. [9] Peyraud, S., et al., “About Non-Line-Of-Sight Satellite Detection and Exclusion in a 3D Map-Aided Localization Algorithm,” Sensors, Vol. 13, 2013, pp. 829-847. [10] Keshvadi, M. H., A. Broumandan, and G. Lachapelle, “Analysis of GNSS Beamforming and Angle of Arrival Estimation in Multipath Environments," Proc ION ITM, San Diego, CA, January 2011, pp. 427-435

    Compensation for research-related injury in South Africa: A critique of the good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines

    Get PDF
    This article examines the current South African Department of Health Good Clinical Practice (2006) guideline recommendations regarding compensation for harm incurred in clinical trials. It applies the case of a phase IIb HIV vaccine trial in South Africa, for which enrolments and vaccinations were suspended early, based on data from an international companion study that indicated no evidence of efficacy and greater susceptibility to HIV infection in a subgroup of vaccinees. The case application indicates certain substantive and procedural limitations within the South African Department of Health Good Clinical Practice (2006) guideline recommendations on compensation for harm, which should be re-considered in order to improve protections for trial participants

    Obtaining informed consent for a sterilisation in the light of recent case law

    Get PDF
    The need to obtain informed consent prior to any sterilisation is a very well-established ethical and legal obligation. South African law, however, does not specifically state who is responsible for obtaining informed consent before performing a sterilisation. This has implications for the liability of a surgeon or gynaecologist in circumstances where the informed consent is defective. Due to the vagueness of the applicable law, a surgeon or gynaecologist might be held liable, even in situations where he/she did not obtain the consent and relied on a nurse or assistant to procure the relevant informed consent. This article explores the relevant statutory law and canvasses two legal cases that came before the court regarding defective informed consent and the resultant liability for damages. We also make recommendations for proposed amendments to the current law to provide further clarity

    Obtaining informed consent for a sterilisation in the light of recent case law

    Get PDF
    The need to obtain informed consent prior to any sterilisation is a very well-established ethical and legal obligation. South African law, however, does not specifically state who is responsible for obtaining informed consent before performing a sterilisation. This has implications for the liability of a surgeon or gynaecologist in circumstances where the informed consent is defective. Due to the vagueness of the applicable law, a surgeon or gynaecologist might be held liable, even in situations where he/she did not obtain the consent and relied on a nurse or assistant to procure the relevant informed consent. This article explores the relevant statutory law and canvasses two legal cases that came before the court regarding defective informed consent and the resultant liability for damages. We also make recommendations for proposed amendments to the current law to provide further clarity

    Research ethics committees in a tight spot: Approving consent strategies for child research that are prima facie illegal but are ethical in terms of national guidelines

    Get PDF
    It is an internationally accepted principle that ethics norms should be applied and enforced in research with humans through ethics review by research ethics committees (RECs). This places RECs at the very heart of the system for protecting participants and enforcing their rights. In the South African ethical-legal framework for child research, there are divergent approaches to consent. That is, section 71 of the National Health Act (No. 61 of 2003) (NHA) requires mandatory parental consent for child research, and limits the authority for proxy consent to parents and legal guardians. However, national ethics guidelines authorised by section 72 of the NHA and issued by the National Health Research Ethics Council (NHREC) acting in terms of its mandate (National Department of Health, 2015) allow a more nuanced approach – i.e. self-consent by older adolescents, provided certain conditions are met, and consent by a range of parental substitutes where there are no available parents or legal guardians. We have argued elsewhere that the consent approach in section 71 is inappropriately restrictive and are of the view that the consent approach endorsed in national ethics guidelines is more defensible. An REC that elects to approve a consent strategy allowable in ethics guidelines is effectively electing to not follow section 71, which raises the question of what the consequences might be for that REC. This article examines the legal liability of RECs through three ‘threads’ of accountability: the NHREC, the institutions hosting RECs, and the courts. We conclude that: (i) if an REC approves a child protocol with consent strategies allowable in terms of national ethics guidelinesbut not in terms of section 71, it is unlikely that the NHREC would discipline the REC in the face of a complaint – provided the REC acted within national ethics guidelines issued by the NHREC in terms of the latter’s section 72 mandate to set national norms and standards; (ii) if an REC approves a consent approach allowed for in ethics guidance, it is also unlikely that the host institution would discipline the REC in the face of a complaint – especially if the institution is aware of the REC’s explicit decision to follow national ethics guidelines that are authorised by section 72 of the NHA; and (iii) an REC could only be sued by a participant in terms of the law of delict (and be liable for damages) if several demanding components are proven, such as that the harm suffered by the participant resulted directly from the REC’s actions in approving a particular consent strategy for that research. Furthermore, the court may well look to national ethics guidelines in making determinations about whether an REC’s conduct was wrongful for the purposes of liability in civil law. RECs are protected from being collectively liable by insurance taken out by their host institutions. We make a series of recommendations to address this issue.Â

    Research ethics committees in a tight spot: Approving consent strategies for child research that are prima facie illegal but are ethical in terms of national guidelines

    Get PDF
    It is an internationally accepted principle that ethics norms should be applied and enforced in research with humans through ethics review by research ethics committees (RECs). This places RECs at the very heart of the system for protecting participants and enforcing their rights. In the South African ethical-legal framework for child research, there are divergent approaches to consent. That is, section 71 of the National Health Act (No. 61 of 2003) (NHA) requires mandatory parental consent for child research, and limits the authority for proxy consent to parents and legal guardians. However, national ethics guidelines authorised by section 72 of the NHA and issued by the National Health Research Ethics Council (NHREC) acting in terms of its mandate (National Department of Health, 2015) allow a more nuanced approach – i.e. self-consent by older adolescents, provided certain conditions are met, and consent by a range of parental substitutes where there are no available parents or legal guardians. We have argued elsewhere that the consent approach in section 71 is inappropriately restrictive and are of the view that the consent approach endorsed in national ethics guidelines is more defensible. An REC that elects to approve a consent strategy allowable in ethics guidelines is effectively electing to not follow section 71, which raises the question of what the consequences might be for that REC. This article examines the legal liability of RECs through three ‘threads’ of accountability: the NHREC, the institutions hosting RECs, and the courts. We conclude that: (i) if an REC approves a child protocol with consent strategies allowable in terms of national ethics guidelinesbut not in terms of section 71, it is unlikely that the NHREC would discipline the REC in the face of a complaint – provided the REC acted within national ethics guidelines issued by the NHREC in terms of the latter’s section 72 mandate to set national norms and standards; (ii) if an REC approves a consent approach allowed for in ethics guidance, it is also unlikely that the host institution would discipline the REC in the face of a complaint – especially if the institution is aware of the REC’s explicit decision to follow national ethics guidelines that are authorised by section 72 of the NHA; and (iii) an REC could only be sued by a participant in terms of the law of delict (and be liable for damages) if several demanding components are proven, such as that the harm suffered by the participant resulted directly from the REC’s actions in approving a particular consent strategy for that research. Furthermore, the court may well look to national ethics guidelines in making determinations about whether an REC’s conduct was wrongful for the purposes of liability in civil law. RECs are protected from being collectively liable by insurance taken out by their host institutions. We make a series of recommendations to address this issue.

    Empirical Investigation on Agile Methods Usage: Issues Identified from Early Adopters in Malaysia

    Get PDF
    Agile Methods are a set of software practices that can help to produce products faster and at the same time deliver what customers want. Despite the benefits that Agile methods can deliver, however, we found few studies from the Southeast Asia region, particularly Malaysia. As a result, less empirical evidence can be obtained in the country making its implementation harder. To use a new method, experience from other practitioners is critical, which describes what is important, what is possible and what is not possible concerning Agile. We conducted a qualitative study to understand the issues faced by early adopters in Malaysia where Agile methods are still relatively new. The initial study involves 13 participants including project managers, CEOs, founders and software developers from seven organisations. Our study has shown that social and human aspects are important when using Agile methods. While technical aspects have always been considered to exist in software development, we found these factors to be less important when using Agile methods. The results obtained can serve as guidelines to practitioners in the country and the neighbouring regions
    corecore