6 research outputs found

    Tryptophan Synthase: Biocatalyst Extraordinaire

    Get PDF
    Tryptophan synthase (TrpS) has emerged as a paragon of noncanonical amino acid (ncAA) synthesis and is an ideal biocatalyst for synthetic and biological applications. TrpS catalyzes an irreversible, C−C bond‐forming reaction between indole and serine to make l‐tryptophan; native TrpS complexes possess fairly broad specificity for indole analogues, but are difficult to engineer to extend substrate scope or to confer other useful properties due to allosteric constraints and their heterodimeric structure. Directed evolution freed the catalytically relevant TrpS β‐subunit (TrpB) from allosteric regulation by its TrpA partner and has enabled dramatic expansion of the enzyme's substrate scope. This review examines the long and storied career of TrpS from the perspective of its application in ncAA synthesis and biocatalytic cascades

    Tryptophan Synthase: Biocatalyst Extraordinaire

    Get PDF
    Tryptophan synthase (TrpS) has emerged as a paragon of noncanonical amino acid (ncAA) synthesis and is an ideal biocatalyst for synthetic and biological applications. TrpS catalyzes an irreversible, C−C bond‐forming reaction between indole and serine to make l‐tryptophan; native TrpS complexes possess fairly broad specificity for indole analogues, but are difficult to engineer to extend substrate scope or to confer other useful properties due to allosteric constraints and their heterodimeric structure. Directed evolution freed the catalytically relevant TrpS β‐subunit (TrpB) from allosteric regulation by its TrpA partner and has enabled dramatic expansion of the enzyme's substrate scope. This review examines the long and storied career of TrpS from the perspective of its application in ncAA synthesis and biocatalytic cascades

    β-Barrel Nanopores with an Acidic-Aromatic Sensing Region Identify Proteinogenic Peptides at Low pH

    Get PDF
    Biological nanopores are emerging as sensitive single-molecule sensors for proteins and peptides. The heterogeneous charge of a polypeptide chain, however, can complicate or prevent the capture and translocation of peptides and unfolded proteins across nanopores. Here, we show that two β-barrel nanopores, aerolysin and cytotoxin K, cannot efficiently detect proteinogenic peptides from a trypsinated protein under a wide range of conditions. However, the introduction of an acidic-aromatic sensing region in the β-barrel dramatically increased the dwell time and the discrimination of peptides in the nanopore at acidic pH. Surprisingly, despite the fact that the two β-barrel nanopores have a similar diameter and an acidic-aromatic construction, their capture mechanisms differ. The electro-osmotic flow played a dominant role for aerolysin, while the electrophoretic force dominated for cytotoxin K. Nonetheless, both β-barrel nanopores allowed the detection of mixtures of trypsinated peptides, with aerolysin nanopores showing a better resolution for larger peptides and cytotoxin K showing a better resolution for shorter peptides. Therefore, this work provides a generic strategy for modifying nanopores for peptide detection that will be most likely be applicable to other nanopore-forming toxins

    Protein Sizing with 15 nm Conical Biological Nanopore YaxAB

    Get PDF
    Nanopores are promising single-molecule tools for the electrical identification and sequencing of biomolecules. However, the characterization of proteins, especially in real-time and in complex biological samples, is complicated by the sheer variety of sizes and shapes in the proteome. Here, we introduce a large biological nanopore, YaxAB for folded protein analysis. The 15 nm cis-opening and a 3.5 nm trans-constriction describe a conical shape that allows the characterization of a wide range of proteins. Molecular dynamics showed proteins are captured by the electroosmotic flow, and the overall resistance is largely dominated by the narrow trans constriction region of the nanopore. Conveniently, proteins in the 35-125 kDa range remain trapped within the conical lumen of the nanopore for a time that can be tuned by the external bias. Contrary to cylindrical nanopores, in YaxAB, the current blockade decreases with the size of the trapped protein, as smaller proteins penetrate deeper into the constriction region than larger proteins do. These characteristics are especially useful for characterizing large proteins, as shown for pentameric C-reactive protein (125 kDa), a widely used health indicator, which showed a signal that could be identified in the background of other serum proteins. </p

    A systematic review on the quantitative relationship between structural and functional network connectivity strength in mammalian brains

    No full text
    The mammalian brain is composed of densely connected and interacting regions, which form structural and functional networks. An improved understanding of the structure-function relation is crucial to understand the structural underpinnings of brain function and brain plasticity after injury. It is currently unclear how functional connectivity strength relates to structural connectivity strength. We obtained an overview of recent papers that report on correspondences between quantitative functional and structural connectivity measures in the mammalian brain. We included network studies in which functional connectivity was measured with resting-state fMRI, and structural connectivity with either diffusion-weighted MRI or neuronal tract tracers. Twenty-seven of the 28 included studies showed a positive structure-function relationship. Large inter-study variations were found comparing functional connectivity strength with either quantitative diffusion-based (correlation coefficient (r) ranges: 0.18-0.82) or neuronal tracer-based structural connectivity measures (r = 0.24-0.74). Two functional datasets demonstrated lower structure-function correlations with neuronal tracer-based (r = 0.22 and r = 0.30) than with diffusion-based measures (r = 0.49 and r = 0.65). The robust positive quantitative structure-function relationship supports the hypothesis that structural connectivity provides the hardware from which functional connectivity emerges. However, methodological differences between the included studies complicate the comparison across studies, which emphasize the need for validation and standardization in brain structure-function studies
    corecore