Effects of Non-Aerobic Maximal Effort Exercise on Fatigue in Deconditioned Men and Women with Multiple Sclerosis

Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a neurodegenerative disease of unknown etiology affecting women more frequently than men. Mental and physical fatigue complaints are often the most disabling symptoms for an MS patient. Both are multifactorial, potentially exacerbated by aerobic exercise, may prevent sustained physical functioning, and significantly interfere with activities of daily living1. A multi-center study was designed to investigate the effects of non-aerobic maximal effort exercise (MEE) for deconditioned persons with MS, with the expectation of minimizing fatigue. The IsoPUMP (Neuromuscular Engineering; Nashville, TN), is a specialized exercise and strength-sensing machine, designed to allow individuals to safely perform and record their non-aerobic MEE sessions. The Modified Fatigue Impact Scale (MFIS) and Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite (MSFC) are common, accepted methods used to measure fatigue and function. The MFIS is a 21-item questionnaire which assesses the subjects’ perception of physical, cognitive, and psychosocial aspects of fatigue over a four-week period2. Each of the 21 items are scored on a scale from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always), and the total MFIS score is calculated by summing the circled number for each item. Total scores can range from 0 to 84; higher scores indicating a greater impact of fatigue on the person. The MFIS has three distinct subscales: (1) physical, (2) cognitive, and (3) psychosocial. These subscales can be scored independently by summing the questions that pertain to each subscale2. The MFIS physical subscale score can range from 0 – 36 and the MFIS cognitive subscale score can range from 0 – 40. The MSFC combines clinical measures used to assess lower limb function (Timed 25-Foot Walk [25-FW]), upper limb function (9-Hole Peg Test [9-HPT]), and cognition (Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test [PASAT-3”])3. The 25-FW is a quantitative measure of lower extremity function. The 9-HPT is a quantitative measure of arm and hand function where a subject inserts and then removes 9 pegs from a board, using one hand at a time. The time is recorded for each hand with the dominant hand trial first and the non-dominant hand trial second. The final score is recorded as the mean time for both hands. The PASAT-3” is a measure of cognitive function, specifically assessing auditory information processing speed, short-term memory, flexibility, and calculation ability. Cognitive dysfunction affects half of all MS patients; slowing ability to reason, concentrate, and recall5. In this test subjects listen to a series of 61 spoken numbers separated by 3 seconds and must add each number to the prior number. Their final PASAT-3” score is the number of correct additions in the series, with 60 reflecting a perfect score. The MSFC is then evaluated by creating Z-scores for each component, which compare each outcome with the average outcome of the study population. The three Z-scores are then averaged to create an overall composite score (the MSFC score) which represents change over time for that population of MS subjects3

The Effect of Progressive Non-Aerobic High-Intensity Maximal Effort Exercise (MEE) on the Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis

Background: Studies indicate that Multiple Sclerosis (MS) patients are less satisfied with the quality of their lives than healthy individuals in similar circumstances. Common symptoms experienced include fatigue, cognitive dysfunction, pain, spasticity, depression, bladder/bowel dysfunction and sexual dysfunction. Several pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods have been employed for such symptoms to try to increase quality of life and reduce the mortality rate. Non-pharmacological methods recommended for MS patients include lifestyle modifications, exercise programs and physical therapy. MS patients easily fatigue during aerobic exercise but a non-aerobic progressive maximal effort exercise (MEE) protocol consisting of a few short, duration isometric and eccentric leg press and whole body lunges was previously seen to increase strength without increasing fatigue. The IsoPUMP® (Neuromuscular Engineering, Nashville TN) exercise system permitted safe conduct and measurement of muscle strength and duration during each exercise repetition

An Analysis of Functional Status in Multiple Sclerosis Patients after Progressive Non-Aerobic High-Intensity Maximal Effort Exercise (MEE)

Background: Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a disease with a wide-ranging impact on functional status. MS patient function has been assessed using Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite Score (MSFCS). The MSFCS includes the standardized scores (Z-score) of three functional tests: the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test (PASAT-3”) for cognitive function, 9-Hole Peg Test (9-HPT) for upper extremity function, and timed 25-foot walk (25-TW) for lower extremity function. One of the most common symptoms experienced by MS patients is severe fatigue, often brought on suddenly by aerobic exercise. Non-aerobic maximal effort exercise (MEE) is thought to increase strength without increasing fatigue. The IsoPUMP® (Neuromuscular Engineering; Nashville, TN) is a stationary exercise device designed for patient use to safely perform MEE leg presses and whole body lunges using isometric and eccentric exercises. The progressive functional changes of the MS patients were tracked using the MSFCs at specific intervals during the study

VASP: A Volumetric Analysis of Surface Properties Yields Insights into Protein-Ligand Binding Specificity

Many algorithms that compare protein structures can reveal similarities that suggest related biological functions, even at great evolutionary distances. Proteins with related function often exhibit differences in binding specificity, but few algorithms identify structural variations that effect specificity. To address this problem, we describe the Volumetric Analysis of Surface Properties (VASP), a novel volumetric analysis tool for the comparison of binding sites in aligned protein structures. VASP uses solid volumes to represent protein shape and the shape of surface cavities, clefts and tunnels that are defined with other methods. Our approach, inspired by techniques from constructive solid geometry, enables the isolation of volumetrically conserved and variable regions within three dimensionally superposed volumes. We applied VASP to compute a comparative volumetric analysis of the ligand binding sites formed by members of the steroidogenic acute regulatory protein (StAR)-related lipid transfer (START) domains and the serine proteases. Within both families, VASP isolated individual amino acids that create structural differences between ligand binding cavities that are known to influence differences in binding specificity. Also, VASP isolated cavity subregions that differ between ligand binding cavities which are essential for differences in binding specificity. As such, VASP should prove a valuable tool in the study of protein-ligand binding specificity

At the Biological Modeling and Simulation Frontier

We provide a rationale for and describe examples of synthetic modeling and simulation (M&S) of biological systems. We explain how synthetic methods are distinct from familiar inductive methods. Synthetic M&S is a means to better understand the mechanisms that generate normal and disease-related phenomena observed in research, and how compounds of interest interact with them to alter phenomena. An objective is to build better, working hypotheses of plausible mechanisms. A synthetic model is an extant hypothesis: execution produces an observable mechanism and phenomena. Mobile objects representing compounds carry information enabling components to distinguish between them and react accordingly when different compounds are studied simultaneously. We argue that the familiar inductive approaches contribute to the general inefficiencies being experienced by pharmaceutical R&D, and that use of synthetic approaches accelerates and improves R&D decision-making and thus the drug development process. A reason is that synthetic models encourage and facilitate abductive scientific reasoning, a primary means of knowledge creation and creative cognition. When synthetic models are executed, we observe different aspects of knowledge in action from different perspectives. These models can be tuned to reflect differences in experimental conditions and individuals, making translational research more concrete while moving us closer to personalized medicine

Outcome of the First wwPDB/CCDC/D3R Ligand Validation Workshop.

Crystallographic studies of ligands bound to biological macromolecules (proteins and nucleic acids) represent an important source of information concerning drug-target interactions, providing atomic level insights into the physical chemistry of complex formation between macromolecules and ligands. Of the more than 115,000 entries extant in the Protein Data Bank (PDB) archive, ∼75% include at least one non-polymeric ligand. Ligand geometrical and stereochemical quality, the suitability of ligand models for in silico drug discovery and design, and the goodness-of-fit of ligand models to electron-density maps vary widely across the archive. We describe the proceedings and conclusions from the first Worldwide PDB/Cambridge Crystallographic Data Center/Drug Design Data Resource (wwPDB/CCDC/D3R) Ligand Validation Workshop held at the Research Collaboratory for Structural Bioinformatics at Rutgers University on July 30-31, 2015. Experts in protein crystallography from academe and industry came together with non-profit and for-profit software providers for crystallography and with experts in computational chemistry and data archiving to discuss and make recommendations on best practices, as framed by a series of questions central to structural studies of macromolecule-ligand complexes. What data concerning bound ligands should be archived in the PDB? How should the ligands be best represented? How should structural models of macromolecule-ligand complexes be validated? What supplementary information should accompany publications of structural studies of biological macromolecules? Consensus recommendations on best practices developed in response to each of these questions are provided, together with some details regarding implementation. Important issues addressed but not resolved at the workshop are also enumerated.The workshop was supported by funding to RCSB PDB by the National Science Foundation (DBI 1338415); PDBe by the Wellcome Trust (104948); PDBj by JST-NBDC; BMRB by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM109046); D3R by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM111528); registration fees from industrial participants; and tax-deductible donations to the wwPDB Foundation by the Genentech Foundation and the Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation.This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from Cell Press via https://doi.org//10.1016/j.str.2016.02.01