1,237 research outputs found
Impact of different time series aggregation methods on optimal energy system design
Modelling renewable energy systems is a computationally-demanding task due to
the high fluctuation of supply and demand time series. To reduce the scale of
these, this paper discusses different methods for their aggregation into
typical periods. Each aggregation method is applied to a different type of
energy system model, making the methods fairly incomparable. To overcome this,
the different aggregation methods are first extended so that they can be
applied to all types of multidimensional time series and then compared by
applying them to different energy system configurations and analyzing their
impact on the cost optimal design. It was found that regardless of the method,
time series aggregation allows for significantly reduced computational
resources. Nevertheless, averaged values lead to underestimation of the real
system cost in comparison to the use of representative periods from the
original time series. The aggregation method itself, e.g. k means clustering,
plays a minor role. More significant is the system considered: Energy systems
utilizing centralized resources require fewer typical periods for a feasible
system design in comparison to systems with a higher share of renewable
feed-in. Furthermore, for energy systems based on seasonal storage, currently
existing models integration of typical periods is not suitable
Elements of Art
Through these paintings and my writing I share how elements of art and science overlap in the strokes of paint that create the perceptions of something familiar in our minds
ΠΠ΅ΡΠΎΠ΄Ρ ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»ΠΈΡΠΎΠ²Π°Π½ΠΈΡ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΠΎΠ² ΡΠ°Π±ΠΎΡΡ ΡΠ»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΈΡΠ΅ΡΠΊΠΈΡ ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ Ρ Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ ΠΈ ΡΠ΅Π½Π΄Π΅Π½ΡΠΈΠΈ ΠΈΡ ΡΠ°Π·Π²ΠΈΡΠΈΡ
Π ΡΡΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ ΡΡΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΡΡΠ΄Ρ Π°ΠΊΡΡΠ°Π»ΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
Π·Π°Π²Π΄Π°Π½Ρ ΠΏΡΠΎΠ΅ΠΊΡΡΠ²Π°Π½Π½Ρ Ρ Π΅ΠΊΡΠΏΠ»ΡΠ°ΡΠ°ΡΡΡ Π²ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π³Π°Ρ Π΄ΠΎΡΡΠ°ΡΠ½ΡΠΎ Π΄ΠΎΠΊΠ»Π°Π΄Π½ΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ ΡΠ΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌΡΠ² ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΎΡΠΈ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΊΡΡΠΈΡΠ½ΠΈΡ
ΡΠΈΡΡΠ΅ΠΌ Π· Π½Π΅ΡΠΈΠΌΠ΅ΡΡΡΡΡ. ΠΠ»Ρ ΡΠ΅Π°Π»ΡΠ·Π°ΡΡΡ ΡΠ°ΠΊΠΈΡ
Π΄ΠΎΡΠ»ΡΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π½Ρ Π½Π΅ΠΎΠ±Ρ
ΡΠ΄Π½Ρ ΡΠΎΠ·ΡΠΎΠ±ΠΊΠΈ Π²ΡΠ΄ΠΏΠΎΠ²ΡΠ΄Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΌΠΎΠ΄Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΉ Π½Π° ΠΎΡΠ½ΠΎΠ²Ρ ΡΡΠ²Π½ΡΠ½Ρ Ρ ΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΈΡ
ΠΊΠΎΠΎΡΠ΄ΠΈΠ½Π°ΡΠ°Ρ
Ρ ΠΏΡΠ΅Π΄ΡΡΠ°Π²Π»Π΅Π½Π½Ρ Π΅Π»Π΅ΠΌΠ΅Π½ΡΡΠ² ΡΡΠΈΡΠ°Π·Π½ΠΈΠΌΠΈ Π±Π°Π³Π°ΡΠΎΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡΡΠ½ΠΈΠΊΠ°ΠΌΠΈ.The decision of a number of actual tasks of planning and exploitation requires the enough detailed researches of the modes of operations of the electric systems with unsymmetry. For realization of such researches developments of the proper models on the basis of equalizations in phase co-ordinates and presentation of elements by three-phase multiterminal network are needed
Modeling Hydrogen Networks for Future Energy Systems: A Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear Approaches
Common energy system models that integrate hydrogen transport in pipelines typically simplify fluid flow models and reduce the network size in order to achieve solutions quickly. This contribution analyzes two different types of pipeline network topologies (namely, star and tree networks) and two different fluid flow models (linear and nonlinear) for a given hydrogen capacity scenario of electrical reconversion in Germany to analyze the impact of these simplifications. For each network topology, robust demand and supply scenarios are generated. The results show that a simplified topology, as well as the consideration of detailed fluid flow, could heavily influence the total pipeline investment costs. For the given capacity scenario, an overall cost reduction of the pipeline costs of 37% is observed for the star network with linear cost compared to the tree network with nonlinear fluid flow. The impact of these improvements regarding the total electricity reconversion costs has led to a cost reduction of 1.4%, which is fairly small. Therefore, the integration of nonlinearities into energy system optimization models is not recommended due to their high computational burden. However, the applied method for generating robust demand and supply scenarios improved the credibility and robustness of the network topology, while the simplified fluid flow consideration can lead to infeasibilities. Thus, we suggest the utilization of the nonlinear model for post-processing to prove the feasibility of the results and strengthen their credibility, while retaining the computational performance of linear modeling
ETHOS.FINE: A Framework for Integrated Energy System Assessment
The decarbonization of energy systems worldwide requires a transformation of
their design and operation across all sectors, that is, the residential and
commercial, industrial, and transportation sectors. Energy system models are
frequently employed for assessing these changes, providing scenarios on
potential future system design and on how new technologies and a modified
infrastructure will meet future energy demands. Thus, they support investment
decisions and policy-making. The Python-based Framework for Integrated Energy
System Assessment (ETHOS.FINE) is a software package that provides a toolbox
for modeling, analyting and evaluating such energy systems using mathematical
optimization. ETHOS.FINE is part of the Energy Transformation paTHway
Optimization Suite (ETHOS) , a collection of modeling tools developed by the
Institute of Energy and Climate Research - Techno-Economic System Analysis
(IEK-3) at Forschungszentrum J\"ulich. ETHOS offers a holistic view on energy
systems at arbitrary scales providing tools for geospatial renewable potential
analyses, time series simulation tools for residential and industrial sector,
discrete choice models for the transportation sector, modeling of global energy
supply routes, and local infrastructure assessments, among others. The ETHOS
model suite is, e.g., used for analyzing the energy transition of Germany
(Stolten et al., 2022)
Hydrogen Road Transport Analysis in the Energy System: A Case Study for Germany through 2050
Carbon-free transportation is envisaged by means of fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEV) propelled by hydrogen that originates from renewably electricity. However, there is a spatial and temporal gap in the production and demand of hydrogen. Therefore, hydrogen storage and transport remain key challenges for sustainable transportation with FCEVs. In this study, we propose a method for calculating a spatially resolved highway routing model for Germany to transport hydrogen by truck from the 15 production locations (source) to the 9683 fueling stations (sink) required by 2050. We consider herein three different storage modes, namely compressed gaseous hydrogen (CGH2), liquid hydrogen (LH2) and liquid organic hydrogen carriers (LOHC). The model applies Dijkstraβs shortest path algorithm for all available source-sink connections prior to optimizing the supply. By creating a detailed routing result for each source-sink connection, a detour factor is introduced for βfirst and last mileβ transportation. The average detour factor of 1.32 is shown to be necessary for the German highway grid. Thereafter, the related costs, transportation time and travelled distances are calculated and compared for the examined storage modes. The overall transportation cost result for compressed gaseous hydrogen is 2.69 β¬/kgH2, 0.73 β¬/kgH2 for liquid hydrogen, and 0.99 β¬/kgH2 for LOHCs. While liquid hydrogen appears to be the most cost-efficient mode, with the integration of the supply chain costs, compressed gaseous hydrogen is more convenient for minimal source-sink distances, while liquid hydrogen would be suitable for distances greater than 130 km
Research of the surge voltage protection by means of Hybrid Real-Time Power System Simulator
The article considers the simulation of surge voltage protection. A functional diagram of this protection model and the means by which the researches were made are presented. The results are the oscillograms of the surge voltage protection operation for the generator
Historic drivers of onshore wind power and inevitable future trade-offs
The required acceleration of onshore wind deployment requires the consideration of both economic and social criteria. With a spatially explicit analysis of the validated European turbine stock, we show that historical siting focused on cost-effectiveness of turbines and minimization of local disamenities, resulting in substantial regional inequalities. A multi-criteria turbine allocation approach demonstrates in 180 different scenarios that strong trade-offs have to be made in the future expansion by 2050. The sites of additional onshore wind turbines can be associated with up to 43% lower costs on average, up to 42% higher regional equality, or up to 93% less affected population than at existing turbine locations. Depending on the capacity generation target, repowering decisions and spatial scale for siting, the mean costs increase by at least 18% if the affected population is minimized β even more so if regional equality is maximized. Meaningful regulations that compensate the affected regions for neglecting one of the criteria are urgently needed
Exploring the trilemma of cost-efficiency, landscape impact and regional equality in onshore wind expansion planning
Onshore wind development has historically focused on cost-efficiency, which may lead to uneven turbine distributions and public resistance due to landscape impacts. Using a multi-criteria planning approach, we show how onshore wind capacity targets can be achieved by 2050 in a cost-efficient, visually unobtrusive and evenly distributed way. For the case study of Germany, we build on the existing turbine stock and use open data on technically feasible turbine locations and data on scenicness of landscapes to plan the optimal expansion. The analysis shows that while the trade-off between optimizing either cost-efficiency or landscape impact of the turbines is rather weak with about 15% higher costs or scenicness, an even distribution has a large impact on these criteria. However, a more evenly distributed expansion is necessary for the achievement of the targeted south quota, a policy target that calls for more wind turbine additions in southern Germany. Our analysis assists stakeholders in resolving the onshore wind expansion trilemma
- β¦