Saproxylic species are linked to the amount and isolation of dead wood across spatial scales in a beech forest

ContextDead wood is a key habitat for saproxylicspecies, which are often used as indicators of habitatquality in forests. Understanding how the amount andspatial distribution of dead wood in the landscapeaffects saproxylic communities is therefore importantfor maintaining high forest biodiversity.ObjectivesWe investigated effects of the amountand isolation of dead wood on the alpha and betadiversity of four saproxylic species groups, with afocus on how the spatial scale influences results.MethodsWe inventoried saproxylic beetles, wood-inhabiting fungi, and epixylic bryophytes and lichenson 62 plots in the Sihlwald forest reserve in Switzer-land. We used GLMs to relate plot-level speciesrichness to dead wood amount and isolation on spatialscales of 20–200 m radius. Further, we used GDMs todetermine how dead wood amount and isolationaffected beta diversity.ResultsA larger amount of dead wood increasedbeetle richness on all spatial scales, while isolation hadno effect. For fungi, bryophytes and lichens this wasonly true on small spatial scales. On larger scales ofour study, dead wood amount had no effect, whilegreater isolation decreased species richness. Further,we found no strong consistent patterns explaining betadiversity

Assessing the response of forest productivity to climate extremes in Switzerland using model-data fusion

The response of forest productivity to climate extremes strongly depends on ambient environmental and site conditions. To better understand these relationships at a regional scale, we used nearly 800 observation years from 271 permanent long-term forest monitoring plots across Switzerland, obtained between 1980 and 2017. We assimilated these data into the 3-PG forest ecosystem model using Bayesian inference, reducing the bias of model predictions from 14% to 5% for forest stem carbon stocks and from 45% to 9% for stem carbon stock changes. We then estimated the productivity of forests dominated by Picea abies and Fagus sylvatica for the period of 1960-2018, and tested for productivity shifts in response to climate along elevational gradient and in extreme years. Simulated net primary productivity (NPP) decreased with elevation (2.86 +/- 0.006 Mg C ha(-1) year(-1) km(-1) for P. abies and 0.93 +/- 0.010 Mg C ha(-1) year(-1) km(-1) for F. sylvatica). During warm-dry extremes, simulated NPP for both species increased at higher and decreased at lower elevations, with reductions in NPP of more than 25% for up to 21% of the potential species distribution range in Switzerland. Reduced plant water availability had a stronger effect on NPP than temperature during warm-dry extremes. Importantly, cold-dry extremes had negative impacts on regional forest NPP comparable to warm-dry extremes. Overall, our calibrated model suggests that the response of forest productivity to climate extremes is more complex than simple shift toward higher elevation. Such robust estimates of NPP are key for increasing our understanding of forests ecosystems carbon dynamics under climate extremes.Peer reviewe

Protection gaps and restoration opportunities for primary forests in Europe

Aims: Primary forests are critical for forest biodiversity and provide key ecosystem services. In Europe, these forests are particularly scarce and it is unclear whether they are sufficiently protected. Here we aim to: (a) understand whether extant primary forests are representative of the range of naturally occurring forest types, (b) identify forest types which host enough primary forest under strict protection to meet conservation targets and (c) highlight areas where restoration is needed and feasible. Location: Europe. Methods: We combined a unique geodatabase of primary forests with maps of forest cover, potential natural vegetation, biogeographic regions and protected areas to quantify the proportion of extant primary forest across Europe\u27s forest types and to identify gaps in protection. Using spatial predictions of primary forest locations to account for underreporting of primary forests, we then highlighted areas where restoration could complement protection. Results: We found a substantial bias in primary forest distribution across forest types. Of the 54 forest types we assessed, six had no primary forest at all, and in two-thirds of forest types, less than 1% of forest was primary. Even if generally protected, only ten forest types had more than half of their primary forests strictly protected. Protecting all documented primary forests requires expanding the protected area networks by 1,132 km2 (19,194 km2 when including also predicted primary forests). Encouragingly, large areas of non-primary forest existed inside protected areas for most types, thus presenting restoration opportunities. Main conclusion: Europe\u27s primary forests are in a perilous state, as also acknowledged by EU\u27s “Biodiversity Strategy for 2030.” Yet, there are considerable opportunities for ensuring better protection and restoring primary forest structure, composition and functioning, at least partially. We advocate integrated policy reforms that explicitly account for the irreplaceable nature of primary forests and ramp up protection and restoration efforts alike

Dead wood distributed in different-sized habitat patches enhances diversity of saproxylic beetles in a landscape experiment

1. Human intervention often alters the availability of habitat for biodiversity. The conservation of biodiversity therefore requires an optimized habitat management. In forests, dead wood represents one of the most important habitats and in boreal and temperate regions around 25% of forest species depend on it (= saproxylic species). Increasing the amount of dead wood in managed forests has thus become a policy objective, but there is no consensus on how to best distribute dead wood in space. 2. In a landscape experiment, we exposed freshly cut beech branches in bundles of different sizes (one, three, six and 12 branches) in the forest, representing newly created habitat patches to be colonized by saproxylic beetles. We investigated how species richness in a ‘single large’ branch bundle compares to that in ‘several small’ bundles (SLOSS debate). We further tested the effects of dead wood availability (amount and isolation) in the surrounding landscape (20–200 m) and environmental factors (temperature and light availability) on species richness, abundance and community composition. 3. The species richness of the pooled small bundles (1 + 3 + 6 = 10 branches) was as high as that of the large bundle (12 branches), despite having a smaller total surface, demonstrating the benefit of spatially dispersed habitat patches for total diversity. Also community composition differed and every bundle size yielded some unique species. Dead wood availability in the surrounding landscape had a minor effect in comparison. Our results further highlight the importance of microsite heterogeneity: species richness was related to light availability, and abundance and community composition were related to temperature. 4. Synthesis and applications: Larger amounts of dead wood harbour more saproxylic beetle species and the distribution of dead wood in patches of different sizes within the forest can promote the development of variable species communities. Combined, this results in a higher species diversity. In managed forests, where retained dead wood is often homogeneous in terms of size or tree species, increasing heterogeneity by distributing dead wood in the forest could foster higher diversity of saproxylic species.ISSN:0021-8901ISSN:1365-266

Effect of habitat availability on small scale distribution of diversity and processes in tree-related microhabitats in primeval and managed beech-dominated forests

International audienc

Effect of habitat availability on small scale distribution of diversity and processes in tree-related microhabitats in primeval and managed beech-dominated forests

International audienc

Deriving forest stand information from small sample plots: An evaluation of statistical methods

Most strategic and operational forest management decisions are taken based on stand-level information, and quantitative models of forest dynamics are key for developing sustainable management strategies. However, data on forest stands for the initialisation of such models that are representative at large spatial scales, e.g., countries or ecoregions, are often lacking. National Forest Inventories (NFIs) provide forest data from small sample plots at large spatial scales, yet deriving full stand information based on such data is challenging. Here, we evaluate seven methods of varying complexity for deriving quantitative stand descriptions based on sample data as provided by the Swiss NFI. We selected 271 extensively measured Swiss forests stands with unimodal diameter distributions, classified them as beech- vs. spruce-dominated in five development stages and randomly placed a small sized sample plot in each stand using the Swiss NFI sampling design (i.e., a circular plot of 500 m2). Seven modelling approaches were used to derive diameter distributions and species-specific stem numbers (i.e., tree species composition) from the sample data that are representative for a particular stand (local scale) and for stand types in general (generalised scale). The prediction performance of the modelling approaches was evaluated using 100 random samples per stand to calculate prediction errors. Generalised even-aged diameter distributions were best predicted by the simultaneous parameter prediction method (PPM), i.e. a combined three-step regression approach, with on average 1.3 to 2.5 times lower prediction errors compared to the simple pooling of diameter samples. However, uneven-aged diameter distributions were best predicted by pooling. At the local scale, the simultaneous PPM performed best for data from sample plots with fewer than 17 to 19 trees across all development stages. Prediction performance of the PPMs increased for structurally and spatially diverse local stands with positively skewed diameter distributions. A Random Forest approach was most suitable for predicting species composition at both the generalised and the local scale. Our study evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of methods to model stands based on data from small sample plots. We emphasise terminological pitfalls by consequently distinguishing local accuracy and generalised representativity of the stand descriptions. We demonstrate the feasibility of deriving locally accurate stands using data from small forest sample plots and evaluate the derivation of generalised stands representative at large regions. At both scales, our developments contribute to an improved initialisation of forest models and thus to a more realistic modelling of forest development under future boundary conditions.ISSN:0378-1127ISSN:1872-704

Spatial patterns of tree-related microhabitats: key factors and ecological significance for the conservation of the associated biodiversity

Tree-related microhabitats (TreMs) are specific, well delineated above-ground tree morphological singularities occurring on living or standing dead trees. TreMs are key features for many taxa and contribute in the complex network of forest resources for biodiversity (1). Large and broadleaved trees bear most of the TreMs within a forest stand (2). The spatial pattern of TreMs is however not only influenced by the spatial distribution of these noteworthy trees, but also by a wide range of natural stochastic, abiotic and biotic processes as well as forestry operations (3). A better knowledge of spatial patterns of TreMs in contrasted forest conditions would help us to promote more biodiversity-friendly forest management practices. First we explored spatial patterns of two TreM types, pivotal for saproxylic beetles, i.e. cavities and polypores, in temperate old-growth forests and compared them with patterns in stands in managed forests, analyzing a compiled European database focusing on beech and oak trees. Secondly, we analyzed the response of TreM-associated saproxylic beetle assemblages, sampled by emergence traps set up on targeted TreMs, to variations in spatial patterns of cavities and polypores. For instance, based on several case studies, we addressed the following questions: is the dissimilarity of assemblages hosted by cavities related to the between-cavity geometric distance? How is the occupancy probability of a cavity-dwelling beetle affected by the distance to the closest occupied cavity? Does an increasing sporocarp density at local scales foster the species richness of fungus-dwelling beetles at the sporocarp scale? Finally, we discuss deemed consequences for conservation of TreM-associated taxa in managed forests. 1-Larrieu L., Paillet Y., Bütler R., Kraus D., Krumm F., Lachat T., Michel A. K., Regnery B., Vandekerkhove K., Winter S. (2018). Tree related microhabitats in temperate and Mediterranean forests of Europe: a reference list and inventory baseline for forest biodiversity research and monitoring. Ecological Indicator 84: 194-207 2-Larrieu L., Cabanettes A. (2012). Species, live status, and diameter are important tree features for diversity and abundance of tree-microhabitats in subnatural montane beech-fir forests. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 42: 1433-1445. 3-Larrieu L., Cabanettes A., Brin A., Bouget C., Deconchat M. (2014). Tree microhabitats at the stand scale in montane beech-fir forests: practical information for taxa conservation in forestry. European journal of Forest Research, 133:355-367peerReviewe