10371 Abstracts Collection -- Dynamic Maps

From September 12th to 17th, 2010, the Dagstuhl Seminar 10371 ``Dynamic Maps \u27\u27 was held in Schloss Dagstuhl~--~Leibniz Center for Informatics. During the seminar, several participants presented their current research, and ongoing work and open problems were discussed. Abstracts of the presentations given during the seminar as well as abstracts of seminar results and ideas are put together in this paper. The first section describes the seminar topics and goals in general. Links to extended abstracts or full papers are provided, if available

Experimental application of an automated alignment correction algorithm for geological CT imaging: phantom study and application to sediment cores from cold-water coral mounds

Background: In computed tomography (CT) quality assurance, alignment of image quality phantoms is crucial for quantitative and reproducible evaluation and may be improved by alignment correction. Our goal was to develop an alignment correction algorithm to facilitate geological sampling of sediment cores taken from a cold-water coral mount. Methods: An alignment correction algorithm was developed and tested with a CT acquisition at 120 kVp and 150 mAs of an image quality phantom. Random translation (maximum 15 mm) and rotation (maximum 2.86°) were applied and ground-truth was compared to parameters determined by alignment correction. Furthermore, mean densities were evaluated in four regions of interest (ROIs) placed in the phantom low-contrast section, comparing values before and after correction to ground truth. This process was repeated 1000 times. After validation, alignment correction was applied to CT acquisitions (140 kVp, 570 mAs) of sediment core sections up to 1 m in length, and sagittal reconstructions were calculated for sampling planning. Results: In the phantom, average absolute differences between applied and detected parameters after alignment correction were 0.01 ± 0.06 mm (mean ± standard deviation) along the x-axis, 0.11 ± 0.08 mm along the y-axis, 0.15 ± 0.07° around the x-axis, and 0.02 ± 0.02° around the y-axis, respectively. For ROI analysis, differences in densities were 63.12 ± 30.57, 31.38 ± 32.10, 18.27 ± 35.57, and 9.59 ± 26.37 HU before alignment correction and 1.22 ± 1.40, 0.76 ± 0.9, 0.45 ± 0.86, and 0.36 ± 0.48 HU after alignment correction, respectively. For sediment core segments, average absolute detected parameters were 3.93 ± 2.89 mm, 7.21 ± 2.37 mm, 0.37 ± 0.33°, and 0.21 ± 0.22°, respectively. Conclusions: The alignment correction algorithm was successfully evaluated in the phantom and allowed a correct alignment of sediment core segments, thus aiding in sampling planning. Application to other tasks, like image quality analysis, seems possible

The matching problem within comparative welfare state research: How to bridge abstract theory and specific hypotheses

Item does not contain fulltex

Evaluation of optimal acquisition delays of DECT iodine maps in pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A potential alternative to the Patlak model of CT perfusion

Introduction: By using bolus tracking with an appropriate acquisition delay dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) iodine maps might serve as a replacement of CT perfusion maps at reduced radiation exposure. This study aimed to evaluate the optimal acquisition delays of DECT for the replacement of parameter maps calculated with the Patlak model in pancreatic adenocarcinoma by corresponding iodine maps. Materials and methods: Dual-source dynamic DECT acquisitions at 80 kVp/Sn140 kVp of 14 patients with pancreatic carcinoma were used to calculate CT perfusion maps of blood volume and permeability with the Patlak model. DECT iodine maps were generated from individual DECT acquisitions, matching acquisition times relative to prior bolus-triggered three-phase CT acquisitions for investigating different acquisition delays. Correlation between perfusion parameters and iodine concentrations was determined for acquisition delays between −6 s and 33 s. Results: Correlation between iodine concentrations and perfusion parameters ranged from −0.05 to 0.63 for blood volume and from −0.05 to 0.71 for permeability, depending on potential trigger delay. The correlation was significant for potential acquisition delays above 1.5 s for blood volume and above 9.0 s for permeability (both p < 0.05). Maximum correlation occurred at an acquisition delay of 15.0 s for blood volume (r = 0.63) and at 25.5 s for permeability (r = 0.71), with significantly lower iodine concentrations in carcinoma (15.0 s: 1.3 ± 0.5 mg/ml; 22.5 s: 1.4 ± 0.7 mg/ml) than in non-neoplastic pancreatic parenchyma (15.0 s: 2.3 ± 0.8 mg/ml; 22.5 s: 2.4 ± 0.6 mg/ml; p < 0.05). Discussion: In the future, well-timed DECT iodine maps acquired with bolus tracking could provide an alternative to permeability and blood volume maps calculated with the Patlak model

Experimental application of an automated alignment correction algorithm for geological CT imaging: phantom study and application to sediment cores from cold-water coral mounds

Background: In computed tomography (CT) quality assurance, alignment of image quality phantoms is crucial for quantitative and reproducible evaluation and may be improved by alignment correction. Our goal was to develop an alignment correction algorithm to facilitate geological sampling of sediment cores taken from a cold-water coral mount. Methods: An alignment correction algorithm was developed and tested with a CT acquisition at 120 kVp and 150 mAs of an image quality phantom. Random translation (maximum 15 mm) and rotation (maximum 2.86°) were applied and ground-truth was compared to parameters determined by alignment correction. Furthermore, mean densities were evaluated in four regions of interest (ROIs) placed in the phantom low-contrast section, comparing values before and after correction to ground truth. This process was repeated 1000 times. After validation, alignment correction was applied to CT acquisitions (140 kVp, 570 mAs) of sediment core sections up to 1 m in length, and sagittal reconstructions were calculated for sampling planning. Results: In the phantom, average absolute differences between applied and detected parameters after alignment correction were 0.01 ± 0.06 mm (mean ± standard deviation) along the x-axis, 0.11 ± 0.08 mm along the y-axis, 0.15 ± 0.07° around the x-axis, and 0.02 ± 0.02° around the y-axis, respectively. For ROI analysis, differences in densities were 63.12 ± 30.57, 31.38 ± 32.10, 18.27 ± 35.57, and 9.59 ± 26.37 HU before alignment correction and 1.22 ± 1.40, 0.76 ± 0.9, 0.45 ± 0.86, and 0.36 ± 0.48 HU after alignment correction, respectively. For sediment core segments, average absolute detected parameters were 3.93 ± 2.89 mm, 7.21 ± 2.37 mm, 0.37 ± 0.33°, and 0.21 ± 0.22°, respectively. Conclusions: The alignment correction algorithm was successfully evaluated in the phantom and allowed a correct alignment of sediment core segments, thus aiding in sampling planning. Application to other tasks, like image quality analysis, seems possible

Image quality evaluation of dual-layer spectral CT in comparison to single-layer CT in a reduced-dose setting

Objectives!#!To quantitatively and qualitatively evaluate image quality in dual-layer CT (DLCT) compared to single-layer CT (SLCT) in the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis in a reduced-dose setting.!##!Methods!#!Intraindividual, retrospective comparisons were performed in 25 patients who received at least one acquisition of all three acquisition protocols SLCT!##!Results!#!Despite matched CTDI!##!Conclusions!#!DLCT!##!Key points!#!• Clinical use of reduced-dose DLCT is feasible despite the required higher tube potential. • DLCT with reduced dose shows comparable objective and subjective image quality to reduced-dose SLCT. • Further dose reduction in the thorax might be possible by adjusting mAs thresholds

Influence of acquisition settings and radiation exposure on CT lung densitometry-An anthropomorphic ex vivo phantom study.

OBJECTIVES:To systematically evaluate the influence of acquisition settings in conjunction with raw-data based iterative image reconstruction (IR) on lung densitometry based on multi-row detector computed tomography (CT) in an anthropomorphic chest phantom. MATERIALS AND METHODS:Ten porcine heart-lung explants were mounted in an ex vivo chest phantom shell, six with highly and four with low attenuating chest wall. CT (Somatom Definition Flash, Siemens Healthineers) was performed at 120kVp and 80kVp, each combined with current-time products of 120, 60, 30, and 12mAs, and was reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and IR (Safire, Siemens Healthineers). Mean lung density (LD), air density (AD) and noise were measured by semi-automated region-of interest (ROI) analysis, with 120kVp/120 mAs serving as the standard of reference. RESULTS:Using IR, noise in lung parenchyma was reduced by ~ 31% at high attenuating chest wall and by ~ 22% at low attenuating chest wall compared to FBP, respectively (p<0.05). IR induced changes in the order of ±1 HU to mean absolute LD and AD compared to corresponding FBP reconstructions which were statistically significant (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS:Densitometry is influenced by acquisition parameters and reconstruction algorithms to a degree that may be clinically negligible. However, in longitudinal studies and clinical research identical protocols and potentially other measures for calibration may be required

Metal Artifact Reduction in Photon-Counting Detector CT: Quantitative Evaluation of Artifact Reduction Techniques

OBJECTIVES: With the introduction of clinical photon-counting detector computed tomography (PCD-CT) and its novel reconstruction techniques, a quantitative investigation of different acquisition and reconstruction settings is necessary to optimize clinical acquisition protocols for metal artifact reduction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multienergy phantom was scanned on a clinical dual-source PCD-CT (NAEOTOM Alpha; Siemens Healthcare GmbH) with 4 different central inserts: water-equivalent plastic, aluminum, steel, and titanium. Acquisitions were performed at 120 kVp and 140 kVp (CTDIvol 10 mGy) and reconstructed as virtual monoenergetic images (VMIs; 110-150 keV), as T3D, and with the standard reconstruction "none" (70 keV VMI) using different reconstruction kernels (Br36, Br56) and with as well as without iterative metal artifact reduction (iMAR). Metal artifacts were quantified, calculating relative percentages of metal artifacts. Mean CT numbers of an adjacent water-equivalent insert and different tissue-equivalent inserts were evaluated, and eccentricity of metal rods was measured. Repeated-measures analysis of variance was performed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Metal artifacts were most prevalent for the steel insert (12.6% average artifacts), followed by titanium (4.2%) and aluminum (1.0%). The strongest metal artifact reduction was noted for iMAR (with iMAR: 1.4%, without iMAR: 10.5%; P < 0.001) or VMI (VMI: 110 keV 2.6% to 150 keV 3.3%, T3D: 11.0%, and none: 16.0%; P < 0.001) individually, with best results when combining iMAR and VMI at 110 keV (1.2%). Changing acquisition tube potential (120 kV: 6.6%, 140 kV: 5.2%; P = 0.33) or reconstruction kernel (Br36: 5.5%, Br56: 6.4%; P = 0.17) was less effective. Mean CT numbers and standard deviations were significantly affected by iMAR (with iMAR: -3.0 ± 21.5 HU, without iMAR: -8.5 ± 24.3 HU; P < 0.001), VMI (VMI: 110 keV -3.6 ± 21.6 HU to 150 keV -1.4 ± 21.2 HU, T3D: -11.7 ± 23.8 HU, and none: -16.9 ± 29.8 HU; P < 0.001), tube potential (120 kV: -4.7 ± 22.8 HU, 140 kV: -6.8 ± 23.0 HU; P = 0.03), and reconstruction kernel (Br36: -5.5 ± 14.2 HU, Br56: -6.8 ± 23.0 HU; P < 0.001). Both iMAR and VMI improved quantitative CT number accuracy and metal rod eccentricity for the steel rod, but iMAR was of limited effectiveness for the aluminum rod. CONCLUSIONS: For metal artifact reduction in PCD-CT, a combination of iMAR and VMI at 110 keV demonstrated the strongest artifact reduction of the evaluated options, whereas the impact of reconstruction kernel and tube potential was limited