The Sun and the Solar Wind Close to the Sun

One of the benefits from the Ulysses, SOHO, and YOHKOH missions has been a strong stimulus to better understand the magnetohydrodynamic processes involved in coronal expansion. Three topics for which this has been especially true are described here. These are: (i) The observed constancy of the radial interplanetary magnetic field strength (as mapped to constant radius). (ii) The geometric spreading of coronal plumes and coronal holes, and the fate of plumes. (iii) The plasma Beta in streamers and the physics of streamer confinement

The expansion of magnetic clouds

Magnetic clouds are a carefully defined subclass of all interplanetary signatures of coronal mass ejections whose geometry is thought to be that of a cylinder embedded in a plane. It has been found that the total magnetic pressure inside the clouds is higher than the ion pressure outside, and that the clouds are expanding at 1 AU at about half the local Alfven speed. The geometry of the clouds is such that even though the magnetic pressure inside is larger than the total pressure outside, expansion will not occur because the pressure is balanced by magnetic tension - the pinch effect. The evidence for expansion of clouds at 1 AU is nevertheless quite strong so another reason for its existence must be found. It is demonstrated that the observations can be reproduced by taking into account the effects of geometrical distortion of the low plasma beta clouds as they move away from the Sun

Models of Plumes: Their Flow, Their Geometric Spreading, and Their Mixing with Interplume Flow

There are two types of plume flow models: (1) 1D models using ad hoc spreading functions, f(r); (2) MagnetoHydroDynamics (MHD) models. 1D models can be multifluid, time dependent, and incorporate very general descriptions of the energetics. They confirm empirical results that plume flow is slow relative to requirements for high speed wind. But, no published 1 D model incorporates the rapid local spreading at the base (fl(r)) which has an important effect on mass flux. The one published MHD model is isothermal, but confirms that if b=8*pi*p/absolute value(B)2<<l then the field is nearly potential below -70,000 km. Building on the MHD result, we apply a two scale approximation to calculate fl(r). We also compute the global spreading (fg(r)) out to 5.0 RSUN imposed by coronal hole geometry. Global MHD models provide a potent method of calculating fg(r). Unambiguous plume signatures have not yet been found in the solar wind. This is probably due to strong mixing of plume and interplume flows near the Sun. We describe a physical source for strong mixing due to the observed flows being unstable to shear instabilities that lead to rapid disruption

Potential flow downstream of the heliospheric terminal shock: A non-spherical shock

We have solved for the potential flow downstream of the terminal shock of the solar wind in the limit of small departures from a spherical shock due to a latitudinal ram pressure variation in the supersonic solar wind. The solution connects anisotropic streamlines at the shock to uniform streamlines down the heliotail because we use a non-slip boundary condition on the heliopause at large radii. The rotational velocity about the heliotail in the near-field solution decays as the fourth power of distance from the shock. The polar divergence of the streamlines will have consequences for the previously discussed magnetic pressure ridge that may build-up just inside the heliopause

Potential Flow Downstream of the Heliospheric Terminal Shock: A Non-Spherical Shock

We have solved for the potential flow downstream of the terminal shock of the solar wind in the limit of small departures from a spherical shock due to a latitudinal ram pressure variation in the supersonic solar wind. The solution connects anisotropic streamlines at the shock to uniform streamlines down the heliotail because we use a non-slip boundary condition on the heliopause at large radii. The rotational velocity about the heliotail in the near-field solution decays as the fourth power of distance from the shock. The polar divergence of the streamlines will have consequences for the previously discussed magnetic pressure ridge that may build-up just inside the heliopause

The Paradox of Filamented Coronal Hole Flow but Uniform High Speed Wind

Plumes and rays in coronal holes are nearly radially aligned density striations that follow the ambient magnetic field. They have long been known, but have gained new interest with growing awareness that coronal hole flow is inherently filamentary. In retrospect, filamentary flow should have been no surprise. This is because,Beta much less than 1 in coronal holes inside approximately 10 Solar radius, allowing the flow to be filamentary down to the smallest scale of photospheric magnetic activity. While the magnetic field itself is locally smooth across any height above ca. 50,000 km, SOHO/MDI has shown that the photospheric magnetic field is a complex array of rapidly evolving small bipoles that are constantly emerging, evolving, and cancelling. The resulting activity is manifested in microflares, concentrated in the magnetic network, that produce Impulsive injections at the footpoints of coronal field lines. The uneven distribution of this activity in space and time is the source of coronal hole filamentation. What is surprising is that the radial flow speed also exhibits filamentary structure. It is not well described as smooth, spherically symmetric, diverging flow, but instead ranges from 300 to over 1000 km/s at 5.5 Solar radius among field-aligned filaments like those seen in plumes and rays [Feldman et al., JGR, Dec. 1997]. This is completely unlike the constant high speed solar wind reported beyond 0.3 AU. Consequently, plumes and filamentary structure must be strongly mixed, and the mixing must be far along by 0.3 AU to be consistent with Helios observations. The paradox is what causes the mixing? Existing models of coronal heating and solar wind acceleration hardly address this issue. One possibility we are investigating is the MHD Kelvin-Helmholtz instability, to which the shear between plumes and interplume corona is expected to become unstable at 5-10 Solar radius. This instability can be simulated and followed far into the nonlinear regime and may lead to Alfvenic fluctuations like those seen at 1 AU

The Width of a Solar Coronal Mass Ejection and the Source of the Driving Magnetic Explosion

We show that the strength of the magnetic field in the area covered by the flare arcade following a CME-producing ejective solar eruption can be estimated from the final angular width of the CME in the outer corona and the final angular width of the flare arcade. We assume (1) the flux-rope plasmoid ejected from the flare site becomes the interior of the CME plasmoid, (2) in the outer corona (R greater than 2R(sub Sun)) the CME is roughly a spherical plasmoid with legs shaped like a light bulb, and (3) beyond some height in or below the outer corona the CME plasmoid is in lateral pressure balance with the surrounding magnetic field. The strength of the nearly radial magnetic field in the outer corona is estimated from the radial component of the interplanetary magnetic field measured by Ulysses. We apply this model to three well-observed CMEs that exploded from flare regions of extremely different size and magnetic setting. One of these CMEs is an over-and-out CME that exploded from a laterally far offset compact ejective flare. In each event, the estimated source-region field strength is appropriate for the magnetic setting of the flare. This agreement (1) indicates that CMEs are propelled by the magnetic field of the CME plasmoid pushing against the surrounding magnetic field, (2) supports the magnetic-arch-blowout scenario for over-and-out CMEs, and (3) shows that a CME s final angular width in the outer corona can be estimated from the amount of magnetic flux covered by the source-region flare arcade

Current Sheet Evolution In The Aftermath Of A CME Event

We report on SOHO UVCS observations of the coronal restructuring following a coronal mass ejection (CME) on 2002 November 26, at the time of a SOHO-Ulysses quadrature campaign. Starting about 1.5 hr after a CME in the northwest quadrant, UVCS began taking spectra at 1.7 R, covering emission from both cool and hot plasma. Observations continued, with occasional gaps, for more than 2 days. Emission in the 974.8 A line of [Fe XVIII], indicating temperatures above 6 x 10(exp 6) K, was observed throughout the campaign in a spatially limited location. Comparison with EIT images shows the [Fe XVIII] emission to overlie a growing post-flare loop system formed in the aftermath of the CME. The emission most likely originates in a current sheet overlying the arcade. Analysis of the [Fe XVIII] emission allows us to infer the evolution of physical parameters in the current sheet over the entire span of our observations: in particular, we give the temperature versus time in the current sheet and estimate its density. At the time of the quadrature, Ulysses was directly above the location of the CME and intercepted the ejecta. High ionization state Fe was detected by the Ulysses SWICS throughout the magnetic cloud associated with the CME, although its rapid temporal variation suggests bursty, rather than smooth, reconnection in the coronal current sheet. The SOHO-Ulysses data set provided us with the unique opportunity of analyzing a current sheet structure from its lowest coronal levels out to its in situ properties. Both the remote and in situ observations are compared with predictions of theoretical CME models