Preferences of Transgender and Gender-Nonconforming Persons in Gender-Confirming Surgical Care

INTRODUCTION: Increased awareness for transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals may lead to increased demand for surgical interventions in gender-confirming care. However, limited literature exists regarding transgender and gender-nonconforming preferences and experiences with medical or surgical care. The authors aim to characterize the medical and surgical care sought by this population, as well as their surgical preferences, motivations, and barriers to care. METHODS: An online questionnaire about opinions and personal experiences with medical and surgical care during gender transition was publicized via regional online social networking forums in Connecticut and surrounding areas catering to transgender communities. RESULTS: Responses were received from 313 participants. Participants were 97% male gender at birth and 92% white with an average (SD) age of 51.6 (13.5) years. Fifty-nine percent identified as male-to-female transgender and 20% as gender nonconforming. Respondents were aware of their gender identity at a mean (SD) age of 9.6 (9.0) years, but did not begin transitioning until a mean (SD) age of 38.9 (20.8) years, with gender-nonconforming respondents choosing to transition at a significantly younger age as compared with transgender respondents (29.8 vs 41.4 years; P = 0.0061, unpaired t test). Only 42% of all respondents, with a significantly greater number of transgender as opposed to gender-nonconforming individuals, had previously met with a physician to discuss transitioning (49% vs 21%, P = 0.002, χ test). Eight percent of the study population had undergone gender confirmation surgery (GCS), 52% were interested in GCS, and 40% were not interested in GCS. Primary motivation for GCS included discomfort in one\u27s current body (28%), and barriers to GCS included cost (40%) and reactions of family (40%), partners (32%), and friends (25%). CONCLUSIONS: Transgender and gender-nonconforming individuals lack medical support for gender transition, with fewer than half of survey respondents reporting a prior meeting with a physician to discuss transitioning. The reported perspectives offer important insight into transgender preferences that should act as the basis of future efforts to improve the efficacy of gender-confirming care

Classification of Subtypes of Apert Syndrome, Based on the Type of Vault Suture Synostosis

Background:. Apert syndrome patients are different in clinical pathology, including obstructive sleep apnea, cleft palate, and mental deficiency. These functional deficiencies may be due to anatomic deformities, which may be caused by different forms of associated suture fusion. Therefore, a classification system of Apert syndrome based on the type of craniosynostosis pattern might be helpful in determining treatment choices. Methods:. CT scans of 31 unoperated Apert syndrome and 51 controls were included and subgrouped as: class I. Bilateral coronal synostosis; class II. Pansynostosis; and class III. Perpendicular combination synostosis: a. unilateral coronal and metopic synostosis; b. sagittal with bilateral/unilateral lambdoid synostosis; and c. others. Results:. Class I is the most common (55%) subtype. The cranial base angulation of class I was normal; however, the cranial base angulation on the cranium side of the skull in class II increased 12.16 degrees (P = 0.006), whereas the facial side cranial base angle of class IIIa decreased 4.31 degrees (P = 0.035) over time. The external cranial base linear measurements of class I showed more evident reduction in anterior craniofacial structures than posterior, whereas other subtypes developed more severe shortening in the posterior aspects. Conclusions:. Bicoronal synostosis is the most common subtype of Apert syndrome with the normalized cranial base angulation. Combined pansynostosis patients have flatter cranial base, whereas the combined unilateral coronal synostosis have a kyphotic cranial base. Class I has more significant nasopharyngeal airway compromise in a vertical direction, whereas classes II and III have more limited oropharyngeal space

Facial Malformation in Crouzon’s Syndrome Is Consistent with Cranial Base Development in Time and Space

Background:. In Crouzon’s syndrome, cranial base deformities begin sequentially in the anterior cranial fossa initially, and later to the posterior cranial base. Facial characteristics are likely related to cranial base development. The temporal correlation between cranial base development and facial features is in need of clarification in Crouzon’s patients, to clarify initial sites of deformity, which may impact surgical decision making. Methods:. Thirty-six computed tomography scans of unoperated Crouzon’s syndrome patients and 54 controls were included and divided into 5 age-subgroups. All the planes used for analysis were set as perpendicular to a defined “midplane” to offset the confounding factor caused by potential asymmetry. Results:. The angle between Sella-Nasion plane and Frankfort horizontal plane was significantly increased before 6 months of age (P = 0.014), with an average 70% (P < 0.001) increase ultimately into adulthood. The angle between SN and maxillary plane and the angle between Sella-Nasion and occlusal planes increased consistently through infancy to adulthood (124% and 42%, respectively, both P < 0.001). The relative angle of mandibular plane to Frankfort horizontal plane increased before 6 months (28%, P = 0.007) with a peak timeframe from 2 to 18 years. Facial lateral curvature related measurements indicate the whole face is inclined posteriorly and inferiorly direction in relation to the anterior cranial base. Conclusion:. Crouzon’s facial malformation development is synchronous and positionally correlational with cranial base deformity. It transmitted from orbit to mandible, with the most evident morphologic changes are in the orbit and midface