[Bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: clinical experience of the Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy]

The bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BRS) technology constitutes the new revolution of the coronary artery disease interventional treatment. Currently, three distinct types of BRSs are available but only one, the Absorb BVS, was on the market in 2013 when the Regional Commission for Medical Devices and the Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery Commission of the Emilia-Romagna Region drew up a technical and scientific essay to provide guidance for the introduction of BRS in public and affiliated health facilities. Five preferential indications were given for use: long coronary lesions (>28 mm), ostial lesions (left main stem excluded), complete revascularization in patients aged 40 mm) or involving the mid/distal left anterior descending (LAD) branch in patients <70 years, spontaneous coronary artery dissection

Outcome of patients on oral anticoagulation undergoing coronary artery stenting: data from discharge to 12 months in the Warfarin and Coronary Stenting (WAR-STENT) Registry

To obtain further, and more focused, information on the efficacy and safety of the antithrombotic regimens, including triple therapy (TT) of warfarin, aspirin, and clopidogrel; dual therapy (DT) of warfarin and single antiplatelet agent (aspirin or clopidogrel); and dual-antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) of aspirin and clopidogrel, prescribed to patients on oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with stent (PCI-S)

Twelve-Month Outcome of Patients with an Established Indication for Oral Anticoagulation Undergoing Coronary Artery Stenting and Stratified by the Baseline Risk of Bleeding. Insights from the Warfarin and Coronary Stenting (War-Stent) Registry

Purpose: To evaluate the outcome of patients with an established indication for oral anticoagulation (OAC) undergoing coronary stent implantation (PCI-S) and stratified by the baseline risk of bleeding. Material and methods: The database of the prospective, multicentre, observational WAR-STENT registry (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00722319) was analyzed and patients with atrial fibrillation and CHA2DS2-VASc score 652, mechanical heart valve, prior cardiac embolism, intra-cardiac thrombus and recent venous thromboembolism who were treated with either triple (warfarin, aspirin and clopidogrel) or dual (warfarin and clopidogrel) or dual antiplatelet (aspirin and clopidogrel) therapy, identified. Patients were then sorted into two groups at non-low and low risk of bleeding, as defined by an ATRIA score >3 and 643 respectively, and compared regarding major adverse cardiac and vascular events (MACVE) and bleeding. Results: At 12-month follow up, MACVE were comparable in the two groups, whereas total, major and minor bleeding, as well as combined MACVE and total bleeding, were significantly more frequent in the non-low bleeding risk group. Upon Cox univariate and multivariable analysis, non-low bleeding risk category confirmed as an independent predictor of major bleeding. The choice of antithrombotic therapy however, appeared not to be influenced by the bleeding risk category at baseline. Conclusions: In patients with an established indication for OAC undergoing PCI-S, non-low bleeding risk category is the most potent independent predictor of major bleeding. Stratification of the bleeding risk at baseline should therefore be regarded as an indispensable process to be carried out before selection of the antithrombotic therapy

Optimal duration of dual antiplatelet therapy after second-generation drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with diabetes: The SECURITY (Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Followed By Six- Versus Twelve-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy)-diabetes substudy.

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The randomized SECURITY (Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation Followed by Six- Versus Twelve-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy) trial showed the non-inferiority of 6 vs. 12-month DAPT after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with second-generation DES in a low-risk population. Nevertheless, diabetes mellitus (DM) remained a major predictor of adverse cardiovascular events. We aimed to assess the interaction between DAPT duration and outcome in DM patients. METHODS: All diabetic patients included in the SECURITY trial treated by second-generation DES PCI were analyzed. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST), or Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) type 3 or 5 bleeding at 12months. The main secondary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, MI, stroke, definite or probable ST, or BARC type 2, 3, or 5 bleeding at 24months. RESULTS: Four hundred-twenty nine DM patients received either 6 (n=206) or 12 (n=223) months of DAPT. The primary endpoint occurred in 3.9% and 5.4% of patients in the 6 and 12-month DAPT group, respectively (log-rank test p=0.83). Similarly, no statistically significant difference in the secondary endpoint was observed between the two study groups (5.4% vs. 7.6%, p=0.620). Stent thrombosis rate was low irrespective of DAPT duration at both 12 (0.5% vs. 0.4%; p=0.804) and between 12 and 24months of follow-up (0.5% vs. 0%, p=0.291). At multivariable analysis, female gender (HR: 3.42; 95% CI 1.32-8.85; p=0.011 and HR 2.28; 95% CI 1.09-4.75; p=0.027) and insulin-treated diabetes mellitus (HR: 2.62; 95% CI 1.15-6.75; p=0.004 and HR: 2.23; 95% CI 1.09-6.33; p=0.003) were independent predictors of both primary and secondary endpoint. CONCLUSIONS: In diabetic patients treated by second-generation DES PCI, we failed to find any additional benefit of prolonging DAPT beyond 6months, regardless of insulin-requiring status.Fondazione Evidence, a nonprofit organization based in Milan, Italy, supported this study, and received generous grants from Biosensors, Medtronic, and Terumo