A similar 24‐h blood pressure control is obtained by zofenopril and candesartan in primary hypertensive patients

Objective. To compare the antihypertensive effect of treatment with zofenopril vs candesartan by office and ambulatory blood pressure (BP). Design and methods. Following a 2‐week wash‐out from previous treatment, 236 grade I–II primary hypertensive patients were randomized double‐blind to 12 weeks treatment with zofenopril 30 mg or candesartan 8 mg od. After 4 weeks, treatment was doubled in responder non‐normalized (office systolic BP⩾140 mmHg and office diastolic BP reduction ⩾10 mmHg) or non‐responder patients (office systolic BP⩾140 mmHg and office diastolic BP reduction <10 mmHg). Following a further 4 weeks, non‐responder or non‐normalized patients were withdrawn. Results. In the intention‐to‐treat population, office systolic BP and diastolic BP reductions after 12 weeks of treatment were similar between the two groups (zofenopril: 21±11/15±8 mmHg, n = 114 vs C: 20±11/15±7 mmHg, n = 122; p = NS). In the 163 patients of the per‐protocol population, office BP dropped by 22±11/15±8 mmHg (zofenopril) an..

Myocardial infarction in major noncardiac surgery: Epidemiology, pathophysiology and prevention

The number of subjects undergoing major noncardiac surgery who are at risk for perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) is growing worldwide. It has been estimated that 500,000 to 900,000 patients suffer major perioperative cardiovascular complications every year, with consequent heavy, long-term prognostic implications and costs. It is well known that perioperative MIs don't share the same pathophysiology as nonsurgical MIs but the relative role of the different, potential triggers has not been completely clarified. Many aspects of the perioperative management, including risk-stratification and prophylactic or postoperative interventions have also not been completely defined. Throughout recent years many resources have been invested to clarify these aspects and experts have developed indices and algorithm-based strategies to better assess the cardiac risk and to guide the perioperative management. The scope of the present review is to discuss the main aspects of perioperative MI in noncardiac surgery, with particular regard to epidemiology, pathophysiology, preoperative risk stratification, prophylaxis and therapy

Thrombogenic potential of human coronary atherosclerotic plaques

n/

The VENERE study: EffectiVenEss of a rehabilitation treatment with Nordic walking in obEse or oveRweight diabetic patiEnts with cardiovascular disease

Background. Nordic walking (NW) has several potential benefits for individuals with cardiovascular disease (CV), type 2 diabetes, and obesity/overweight. It improves cardiovascular health, including exercise capacity and blood pressure control. It enhances glycemic control and insulin sensitivity in diabetes. It aids in weight management and body composition improvement. NW offers additional advantages such as improved muscular strength, joint mobility, physical activity levels, and psychological well-being. Methods. This open-label study with three arms will aim to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and adherence to exercise prescription in obese/overweight diabetic patients with CV complications. The primary objective will be to assess the CV performance of participants after a 6- and 12-month follow-up period, following a 3-month NW intervention, compared with standard rehabilitation (SR) and cardiological counseling (control group, CG) training lasting 3 months. Results. The results of the study will provide valuable insights into the comparative effectiveness of a NW intervention versus SR and CG training in improving cardiovascular performance in obese/overweight diabetic patients with CV complications. Additionally, safety and adherence data will help inform the feasibility and sustainability of the exercise prescription over an extended period. Conclusions. These findings may have implications for the development of tailored exercise programs for this specific patient population, with the aim of optimizing cardiovascular health outcomes. This protocol was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov with reference ID: NCT05987410 on 10 August 2023

Myocardial infarction in major noncardiac surgery: Epidemiology, pathophysiology and prevention

The number of subjects undergoing major noncardiac surgery who are at risk for perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) is growing worldwide. It has been estimated that 500,000 to 900,000 patients suffer major perioperative cardiovascular complications every year, with consequent heavy, long-term prognostic implications and costs. It is well known that perioperative MIs don’t share the same pathophysiology as nonsurgical MIs but the relative role of the different, potential triggers has not been completely clarified. Many aspects of the perioperative management, including risk-stratification and prophylactic or postoperative interventions have also not been completely defined. Throughout recent years many resources have been invested to clarify these aspects and experts have developed indices and algorithm-based strategies to better assess the cardiac risk and to guide the perioperative management. The scope of the present review is to discuss the main aspects of perioperative MI in noncardiac surgery, with particular regard to epidemiology, pathophysiology, preoperative risk stratification, prophylaxis and therapy

Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Trials of Levosimendan in Acute Myocardial Infarction

The treatment of acute myocardial infarction is early revascularization. Heart failure and cardiogenic shock may complicate acute myocardial infarction despite applying the best available strategy. Levosimendan is a relatively new drug to treat heart failure with a peculiar mechanism of action: calcium sensitization of myocardial fibres. Levosimendan has a direct inotropic effect but also pleiotropic effects; through the K+ATP channel’s opening, it also has a vasodilator effect which may participate concretely in the global effects of the drug. The focus of the literature is on the anti-heart failure and anti-cardiogenic shock properties of Levosimendan, but it may have effects also preventing the development of myocardial insufficiency in acute myocardial infarction. The aim of the meta-analysis is to evaluate the effect of Levosimendan on acute myocardial infarction in placebo-controlled trials. Based on the eight studies selected, we found a beneficial effect of Levosimendan on acute and long-term mortality of patients affected by acute myocardial infarction. With caution in interpreting the results of this meta-analysis, our data support the idea that Levosimendan may already have a role in the treatment of acute ischemic heart disease. Further studies specifically designed to investigate the early role in the treatment of ischemic heart failure are needed

Predictors of Mortality and Long-Term Outcome in Patients with Anterior STEMI: Results from a Single Center Study

Anterior ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (A-STEMI) has the worst prognosis among all infarct sites due to larger infarct size and the higher cardiac enzyme release. We retrospectively analyzed 584 A-STEMI undergoing urgent coronary angiography from October 2008 to April 2019. The median follow-up time was 1774 days with a minimum of a 1-year follow-up for 498 patients. In-hospital mortality was 8.6%, while long-term, all-cause mortality and 1-year mortality were 18.8% and 6.8%, respectively. The main predictors for in-hospital mortality were ejection fraction (LV-EF), baseline estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), female gender and cardiogenic shock (CS) at admission, while long-term predictors of mortality were age, coronary artery disease (CAD) extension and LV-EF. Patients presenting with CS (6.5%) showed a higher mortality rate (in-hospital 68.4%, long term 41.7%). Among 245 patients (42%) with multivessel disease (MVD), complete revascularization (CR) during the index procedure was performed in 42.8% of patients and more often in patients with CS at admission (19.1% vs. 6.1%, p = 0.008). Short- and long-term mortality were not significantly influenced by the revascularization strategy (CR/culprit only). Our study confirmed the extreme fragility of A-STEMI patients, especially in case of CS at admission. LV-EF is a powerful predictor of a poor outcome. In MVD, CR during p-PCI did not show any advantage for either long- or short-term mortality compared to the culprit-only strategy

New Onset Atrial Fibrillation in STEMI Patients: Main Prognostic Factors and Clinical Outcome

The indications for the treatment of patients with known atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are clear, while less is available about the management of new-onset AF (NOAF) during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The aim of this study is to evaluate mortality and clinical outcome of this high-risk subgroup of patients. We analyzed 1455 consecutive patients undergoing PCI for STEMI. NOAF was detected in 102 subjects, 62.7% males, with a mean age of 74.8 ± 10.6 years. The mean ejection fraction (EF) was 43.5 ± 12.1% and the mean atrial volume was increased (58 ± 20.9 mL). NOAF occurred mainly in the peri-acute phase and had a very variable duration (8.1 ± 12.5 min). During hospitalization, all the patients were treated with enoxaparin, but only 21.6% of them were discharged with long term oral anticoagulation. The majority of patients had a CHA2DS2-VASc score >2 and a HAS-BLED score of 2 or 3. The in-hospital mortality was 14.2%, while the 1-year mortality was 17.2% and long-term mortality 32.1% (median follow-up 1820 days). We identified age as an independent predictor of mortality both at short- and long-term follow-ups, while EF was the only independent predictor for in-hospital mortality and arrhythmia duration for 1-year mortality. At the 1-year follow-up, we recorded three ischemic strokes and no bleeding complications