Brave New Open Data World?

There is a growing tendency to release all sorts of public data on the Internet. The greater availability of interoperable public data catalyses secondary use of such data, which leads to growth of information industries and better government transparency. Open data policies may, nevertheless, be in conflict with the individual’s right to information privacy as protected by the Data Protection Directive. This directive sets rules to the processing of personal data in the European Union. Technological developments and the increasing amount of publicly available data are, however, blurring the lines between non-personal and personal data. Open data may not seem to be personal data on first glance especially when it is anonymised or aggregated. However, it may become personal data by combining it with other publicly available data or when it is de-anonymised. In this article, we argue that these developments extend the reach of European Union privacy regulation to open data, which may obstruct the implementation of open data policies in the European Union

Google Spain v. Gonzalez: did the court forget about freedom of expression?

In this note we discuss the controversial judgment in Google Spain v. González of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Our focus is on the judgment’s implications for freedom of expression. First, the facts of the case and the CJEU’s judgment are summarised. We then argue that the CJEU did not give enough attention to the right to freedom of expression. By seeing a search engine operator as a controller regarding the processing of personal data on third party web pages, the CJEU assigns the operator the delicate task of balancing the fundamental rights at stake. However, such an operator may not be the most appropriate party to balance the rights of all involved parties, in particular in cases where such a balance is hard to strike. Furthermore, it is a departure from human rights doctrine that according to the CJEU privacy and data protection rights override, “as a rule”, the public’s right to receive information. In addition, after the judgement it has become unclear whether search engine operators have a legal basis for indexing websites that contain special categories of data. We also discuss steps taken by Google to comply with the judgment

Data protection legislation: A very hungry caterpillar: The case of mapping data in the European Union

The European Union's policy on open data aims at generating value through re-use of public sector information, such as mapping data. Open data policies should be applied in full compliance with the principles relating to the protection of personal data of the EU Data Protection Directive. Increased computer power, advancing data mining techniques and the increasing amount of publicly available big data extend the reach of the EU Data ProtectionDirective to much more data than currently assumed and acted upon. Especially mapping data are a key factor to identify individual data subjects and consequently subject to the EU Data Protection Directive and the recently approved EU General Data Protection Regulation. This could in effect obstruct the implementation of open data policies in the EU. The very hungry data protection legislation results in a need to rethink either the concept of personal data or the conditions for use of mapping data that are considered personal data.OLD Geo-information and Land Developmen

P.INC Privacy and D&I Policy Guide

A legal handout for HR practitioners on the ins and outs of the GDPR in relation to collecting data on employees’ sexual orientation and gender identity for the purposes of developing evidence-based policy

Locally tame plane polynomial automorphisms

Contains fulltext : 93928.pdf (preprint version ) (Open Access

A characterization of semisimple plane polynomial automorphisms

Contains fulltext : 84386.pdf (preprint version ) (Open Access)10 p

Polynomial maps which are roots of power series

Item does not contain fulltext12 p

P.INC Privacy and D&I Policy Guide

A legal handout for HR practitioners on the ins and outs of the GDPR in relation to collecting data on employees’ sexual orientation and gender identity for the purposes of developing evidence-based policy