Jejunal Diverticular Perforation due to Enterolith

Jejunal diverticulosis is a rare entity with variable clinical and anatomical presentations. Although there is no consensus on the management of asymptomatic jejunal diverticular disease, some complications are potentially life-threatening and require early surgical treatment. Small bowel perforation secondary to jejunal diverticulitis by enteroliths is rare. The aim of this study was to report a case of small intestinal perforation caused by a large jejunal enterolith. An 86-year-old woman was admitted with signs of diffuse peritonitis. After initial fluid recovery the patient underwent emergency laparotomy. The surgery showed that she had small bowel diverticular disease, mainly localized in the proximal jejunum. The peritonitis was due to intestinal perforation caused by an enterolith 12 cm in length, localized inside one of these diverticula. The intestinal segment containing the perforated diverticulum with the enterolith was removed and an end-to-end anastomosis was done to reconstruct the intestinal transit. The patient recovered well and was discharged from hospital on the 5th postoperative day. There were no signs of abdominal pain 1 year after the surgical procedure. Although jejunal diverticular disease with its complications, such as formation of enteroliths, is difficult to suspect in patients with peritonitis, it should be considered as a possible source of abdominal infection in the elderly patient when more common diagnoses have been excluded

Thirteen years of surgical site infection surveillance in Swiss hospitals

Contexte : Les infections du site opératoire (Surgical Site Infections - SSI) sont des complications fréquentes des procédures chirurgicales et un problème majeur de la santé publique. La surveillance constitue un élément essentiel de la prévention des SSI. Les résultats publiés récemment par certains pays européens suggèrent un impact positif qu'un réseau de surveillance active peut avoir sur le taux de SSI dans les hôpitaux participants. Objectif : La présente étude évalue les effets de la surveillance sur l'incidence des SSI en analysant les résultats du programme suisse multicentrique de surveillance des SSI. Méthodes : L'étude porte sur les 13 premières années du programme, regroupant au total 23 hôpitaux périphériques, cantonaux et universitaires de la Suisse occidentale et du sud. Ce programme, qui a intégré le consortium national Swissnoso en 2011, a été organisé conformément aux principes du système américain de National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS). La surveillance incluait les procédures de la chirurgie viscérale (appendicectomie, cholécystectomie, chirurgie du colon et herniaire) et de l'orthopédie (arthroplastie de la hanche et du genou). Les données démographiques et cliniques étaient recueillies de manière standardisée par les infirmières cliniciennes en infectiologie pendant et après l'hospitalisation. Les rapports annuels, résumant les taux des SSI pour chaque type de procédure ainsi que la comparaison inter-hospitalière des risques relatifs ajustés à l'index NNIS, ont été discutés au sein de chaque établissement entre le comité des chirurgiens et le responsable local du programme. Analyses statistiques : Les taux cumulatifs des SSI ont été calculés pour chaque procédure chirurgicale. Une stratification selon le type de SSI (superficielle, profonde, organe/espace) et selon l'index NNIS a été respectée. Les facteurs de risque des SSI ont été identifiés pour chaque procédure par les analyses univariées des caractéristiques du patient (âge, sexe, score ASA, temps avant l'opération) et celles de l'opération (classe de contamination, durée de la chirurgie, urgence, antibioprophylaxie, laparoscopie, procédures multiples, ré¬intervention). Afin d'évaluer l'effet de la durée de la surveillance sur le taux des SSI, le temps de participation au programme a été calculé et stratifié par périodes d'un an par hôpital et par procédure. La corrélation entre la durée de la surveillance et les SSI a été estimée en utilisant les modèles de régression logistique pour chaque procédure avec l'ajustement pour les variables avec p ^ 0.2. Dans toutes les analyses, la valeur p < 0.05 était considéré significative. Résultats : Les taux globaux des SSI étaient : 18.2% pour les colectomies, 6.4% pour les appendicectomies, 2.3% pour les cholécystectomies, 1.7% pour les cures des hernies et 1.6% et 1.3% pour les arthroplasties de la hanche et du genou, respectivement. L'incidence des SSI post-hospitalières allait du 21% pour les colectomies au 94% pour les arthroplasties du genou. Concernant les facteurs prédictifs des SSI, l'index NNIS était valable seulement pour la chirurgie gastro-intestinale, la laparoscopie étant globalement protectrice mais associée à un taux d'infections profondes plus élevé après l'appendicectomie. La durée de la participation au programme de surveillance n'apportait pas de diminution des taux des SSI dans aucune procédure incluse dans l'étude. Conclusions : L'étude confirme l'impact de la surveillance post-hospitalière sur le taux des SSI, l'effet protectrice de la laparoscopie ainsi que l'absence de la valeur prédictive de l'index NNIS en orthopédie. Contrairement aux autres programmes européens nous n'avons pas détecté d'effet positif de la durée de la surveillance sur le taux des SSI. Les résultats obtenus ouvrent la discussion sur l'utilisation plus effective des données de surveillance des SSI

Thirteen years of surgical site infection surveillance in Swiss hospitals.

BACKGROUND: Surveillance is an essential element of surgical site infection (SSI) prevention. Few studies have evaluated the long-term effect of these programmes. AIM: To present data from a 13-year multicentre SSI surveillance programme from western and southern Switzerland. METHODS: Surveillance with post-discharge follow-up was performed according to the US National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) system methods. SSI rates were calculated for each surveyed type of surgery, overall and by year of participation in the programme. Risk factors for SSI and the effect of surveillance time on SSI rates were analysed by multiple logistic regression. FINDINGS: Overall SSI rates were 18.2% after 7411 colectomies, 6.4% after 6383 appendicectomies, 2.3% after 7411 cholecystectomies, 1.7% after 9933 herniorrhaphies, 1.6% after 6341 hip arthroplasties, and 1.3% after 3667 knee arthroplasties. The frequency of SSI detected after discharge varied between 21% for colectomy and 94% for knee arthroplasty. Independent risk factors for SSI differed between operations. The NNIS risk index was predictive of SSI in gastrointestinal surgery only. Laparoscopic technique was protective overall, but associated with higher rates of organ-space infections after appendicectomy. The duration of participation in the surveillance programme was not associated with a decreased SSI rate for any of the included procedure. CONCLUSION: These data confirm the effect of post-discharge surveillance on SSI rates and the protective effect of laparoscopy. There is a need to establish alternative case-mix adjustment methods. In contrast to other European programmes, no positive impact of surveillance duration on SSI rates was observed

Combined treatment of refractory ascites with an alfapump (R) plus hernia repair in the same surgical session: A retrospective, multicentre, European pilot study in cirrhotic patients

International audienceIntroduction: The treatment of symptomatic hernia in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites is critical but challenging. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and safety of the implantation of alfapump (R) combined with concomitant hernia repair in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites. Methods: Using data from six European centres, we retrospectively compared patients treated with alfapump (R) system implantation and concomitant hernia repair [the combined treatment group (CT group, n = 12)] or with intermittent paracentesis hernia repair [the standard treatment group (ST group, n = 26)]. Some patients of the ST group had hernia repair in an elective setting (STel group) and others in emergency (STem group). The endpoints were requirement of peritoneal drainage, the rate of infectious complications, the in-hospital mortality, the length of stay, paracentesis-free survival. Results: Postoperatively, none of the patients in the CT group and 21 patients (80%) in the ST group underwent peritoneal drainage for the evacuation of ascites fluid (P < 0.0001). The overall incidence of infectious complications was not different between groups but there were fewer infections in the CT group than in the STem group (33% vs. 81%; P = 0.01). There was no difference for in-hospital mortality. The length of stay was shorter in the CT group (P = 0.03). Paracentesis-free survival was significantly better (P = 0.0003) in the CT group than in the ST group. Conclusion: Implantation of alfapump combined with concomitant hernia repair seems feasible and safe in cirrhotic patients; however, larger and randomized study are required. (C) 2020 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS

Surgical technique for placement of the automated low flow ascites pump (Alfapump).

Approximately 10% of patients with ascites associated with cirrhosis fail to respond to dietary rules and diuretic treatment and therefore present with refractory ascites. In order to avoid iterative large-volume paracentesis in patients with contraindication to TIPS, the automated low flow ascites pump system (Alfapump) was developed to pump ascites from the peritoneal cavity into the urinary bladder, where it is eliminated spontaneously by normal micturition. This manuscript reports the surgical technique for placement of the Alfapump

Incisional Hernia: Complications &amp; Quality of Life

Results from this interim analysis with a median follow-up of 58 weeks demonstrate low rates of recurrence and post-operative complications after the repair of abdominal wall defects using PermacolTM surgical implant