Quantifying the healthcare costs of treating severely bleeding major trauma patients: a national study for England.

INTRODUCTION: Severely bleeding trauma patients are a small proportion of the major trauma population but account for 40% of all trauma deaths. Healthcare resource use and costs are likely to be substantial but have not been fully quantified. Knowledge of costs is essential for developing targeted cost reduction strategies, informing health policy, and ensuring the cost-effectiveness of interventions. METHODS: In collaboration with the Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) detailed patient-level data on in-hospital resource use, extended care at hospital discharge, and readmissions up to 12 months post-injury were collected on 441 consecutive adult major trauma patients with severe bleeding presenting at 22 hospitals (21 in England and one in Wales). Resource use data were costed using national unit costs and mean costs estimated for the cohort and for clinically relevant subgroups. Using nationally available data on trauma presentations in England, patient-level cost estimates were up-scaled to a national level. RESULTS: The mean (95% confidence interval) total cost of initial hospital inpatient care was £19,770 (£18,177 to £21,364) per patient, of which 62% was attributable to ventilation, intensive care, and ward stays, 16% to surgery, and 12% to blood component transfusion. Nursing home and rehabilitation unit care and re-admissions to hospital increased the cost to £20,591 (£18,924 to £22,257). Costs were significantly higher for more severely injured trauma patients (Injury Severity Score ≥15) and those with blunt injuries. Cost estimates for England were £148,300,000, with over a third of this cost attributable to patients aged 65 years and over. CONCLUSIONS: Severely bleeding major trauma patients are a high cost subgroup of all major trauma patients, and the cost burden is projected to rise further as a consequence of an aging population and as evidence continues to emerge on the benefits of early and simultaneous administration of blood products in pre-specified ratios. The findings from this study provide a previously unreported baseline from which the potential impact of changes to service provision and/or treatment practice can begin to be evaluated. Further studies are still required to determine the full costs of post-discharge care requirements, which are also likely to be substantial

Changes in the use of fresh-frozen plasma transfusions in preterm neonates: a single center experience

The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in the use of fresh-frozen plasma (FFP) transfusions and the use of clotting tests in preterm neonates in our center over the past two decades. In this retrospective cohort analysis, we included all consecutive neonates with a gestational age at birth between 24 + 0 and 31 + 6 weeks admitted to our neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) between 2004 and 2019. We divided all included neonates into three consecutive time epochs according to date of birth: January 2004 to April 2009, May 2009 to August 2014 and September 2014 to December 2019. The main outcomes were the use of FFP transfusion, coagulation testing and the indications for FFP transfusion. The percentage of preterm neonates receiving FFP transfusion decreased from 5.7% (47/824) to 3.7% (30/901) to 2.0% (17/852) from the first epoch to the last epoch (p < 0.001). Additionally, the rate of neonates undergoing coagulation testing decreased from 24.3% (200/824) to 14.5% (131/901) to 8% (68/852) over the epochs (p < 0.001). Most FFP transfusions were prescribed prophylactically based on prolongation of activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) or prothrombin time (PT) (56%). In conclusion, both the use of FFP transfusions and the use of coagulation tests decreased significantly over the years. The majority of the FFP transfusions were administrated prophylactically for abnormal coagulation tests.Developmen

Expected individual benefit of prophylactic platelet transfusions in hemato-oncology patients based on bleeding risks

Background: Prophylactic platelet transfusions prevent bleeding in hematooncology patients, but it is unclear how any benefit varies between patients. Our aim was to assess if patients with different baseline risks for bleeding benefit differently from a prophylactic platelet transfusion strategy. Study design and methods: Using the data from the randomized controlled TOPPS trial (Trial of Platelet Prophylaxis), we developed a prediction model for World Health Organization grades 2, 3, and 4 bleeding risk (defined as at least one bleeding episode in a 30 days period) and grouped patients in four risk-quartiles based on this predicted baseline risk. Predictors in the model were baseline platelet count, age, diagnosis, disease modifying treatment, disease status, previous stem cell transplantation, and the randomization arm. Results: The model had a c-statistic of 0.58 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.54– 0.64). There was little variation in predicted risks (quartiles 46%, 47%, and 51%), but prophylactic platelet transfusions gave a risk reduction in all risk quartiles. The absolute risk difference (ARD) was 3.4% (CI 12.2 to 18.9) in the lowest risk quartile (quartile 1), 7.4% (95% CI 8.4 to 23.3) in quartile 2, 6.8% (95% CI 9.1 to 22.9) in quartile 3, and 12.8% (CI 3.1 to 28.7) in the highest risk quartile (quartile 4). Conclusion: In our study, generally accepted bleeding risk predictors had limited predictive power (expressed by the low c-statistic), and, given the wide confidence intervals of predicted ARD, could not aid in identifying subgroups of patients who might benefit more (or less) from prophylactic platelet transfusionClinical epidemiolog

Variation in Blood Transfusion and Coagulation Management in Traumatic Brain Injury at the Intensive Care Unit: A Survey in 66 Neurotrauma Centers Participating in the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury Study

Our aim was to describe current approaches and to quantify variability between European intensive care units (ICUs) in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI). Therefore, we conducted a provider profiling survey as part of the Collaborative European NeuroTrauma Effectiveness Research in Traumatic Brain Injury (CENTER-TBI) study. The ICU Questionnaire was sent to 68 centers from 20 countries across Europe and Israel. For this study, we used ICU questions focused on 1) hemoglobin target level (Hb-TL), 2) coagulation management, and 3) deep venous thromboembolism (DVT) prophylaxis. Seventy-eight participants, mostly intensivists and neurosurgeons of 66 centers, completed the ICU questionnaire. For ICU-patients, half of the centers (N = 34; 52%) had a defined Hb-TL in their protocol. For patients with TBI, 26 centers (41%) indicated an Hb-TL between 70 and 90 g/L and 38 centers (59%) above 90 g/L. To treat trauma-related hemostatic abnormalities, the use of fresh frozen plasma (N = 48; 73%) or platelets (N = 34; 52%) was most often reported, followed by the supplementation of vitamin K (N = 26; 39%). Most centers reported using DVT prophylaxis with anticoagulants frequently or always (N = 62; 94%). In the absence of hemorrhagic brain lesions, 14 centers (21%) delayed DVT prophylaxis until 72 h after trauma. If hemorrhagic brain lesions were present, the number of centers delaying DVT prophylaxis for 72 h increased to 29 (46%). Overall, a lack of consensus exists between European ICUs on blood transfusion and coagulation management. The results provide a baseline for the CENTER-TBI study, and the large between-center variation indicates multiple opportunities for comparative effectiveness research

The regulation of globin gene expression during development

SIGLEAvailable from British Library Document Supply Centre- DSC:D186334 / BLDSC - British Library Document Supply CentreGBUnited Kingdo

Prophylactic platelet transfusions: why less is more

In short, given the current evidence base, we recommend the use of restrictive platelet transfusion thresholds while awaiting the results of new/ongoing studies and large-scale epidemiologic studies. Future trialists will have an opportunity to address the identified challenges and additionally improve the efficiency and design of these trials using electronic patient data and advanced trial designs. There clearly is a need for new biomarkers and models to better predict bleeding risk for more tailored platelet transfusion decisions, implementation strategies to support evidence-based transfusion practices, and fundamental research to better understand the mechanisms of transfusion-related harm.Developmen

The burden of invasive infections in neutropenic patients: incidence, outcomes, and use of granulocyte transfusions

Stemcel biology/Regenerative medicine (incl. bloodtransfusion

The burden of invasive infections in neutropenic patients: incidence, outcomes, and use of granulocyte transfusions

Stemcel biology/Regenerative medicine (incl. bloodtransfusion