Targeting TIGIT for Immunotherapy of Cancer: Update on Clinical Development

Immune checkpoint blockers have dramatically improved the chances of survival in patients with metastatic cancer, but only a subset of the patients respond to treatment. Search for novel targets that can improve the responder rates and overcome the limitations of adverse events commonly seen with combination therapies, like PD-1 plus CTLA-4 blockade and PD-1/PD-L1 plus chemotherapy, led to the development of monoclonal antibodies blocking T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain (TIGIT), a inhibitory checkpoint receptor expressed on activated T cells and NK cells. The strategy showed potential in pre-clinical and early clinical studies, and 5 molecules are now in advanced stages of evaluation (phase II and above). This review aims to provide an overview of clinical development of anti-TIGIT antibodies and describes the factors considered and thought process during early clinical development. Critical aspects that can decide the fate of clinical programs, such as origin of the antibody, Ig isotype, FCγR binding, and the dose as well as dosing schedule, are discussed along with the summary of available efficacy and safety data from clinical studies and the challenges in the development of anti-TIGIT antibodies, such as identifying patients who can benefit from therapy and getting payer coverage

Human Mass Balance and Metabolite Profiling of [C-14]-Pamiparib, a Poly (ADP-Ribose) Polymerase Inhibitor, in Patients With Advanced Cancer

Pamiparib, a selective poly (ADP‐ribose) polymerase 1/2 inhibitor, demonstrated tolerability and antitumor activity in patients with solid tumors at 60 mg orally twice daily. This phase 1 open‐label study (NCT03991494; BGB‐290‐106) investigated the absorption, metabolism, and excretion (AME) of 60 mg [(14)C]‐pamiparib in 4 patients with solid tumors. The mass balance in excreta, blood, and plasma radioactivity and plasma pamiparib concentration were determined along with metabolite profiles in plasma, urine, and feces. Unchanged pamiparib accounted for the most plasma radioactivity (67.2% ± 10.2%). Pamiparib was rapidly absorbed with a median time to maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) of 2.00 hours (range, 1.00‐3.05 hours). After reaching C(max), pamiparib declined in a biphasic manner, with a geometric mean terminal half‐life (t(1/2)) of 28.7 hours. Mean cumulative [(14)C]‐pamiparib excretion was 84.7% ± 3.5%. Pamiparib was mainly cleared through metabolism, primarily via N‐oxidation and oxidation of the pyrrolidine ring. A dehydrogenated oxidative product (M3) was the most abundant metabolite in biosamples. A mean of 2.11% and 1.11% of [(14)C]‐pamiparib was excreted as unchanged pamiparib in feces and urine, respectively, indicating near‐complete absorption and low renal clearance of parent drug. Cytochrome P450 (CYP) phenotyping demonstrated CYP2C8 and CYP3A involvement in pamiparib metabolism. These findings provide an understanding of pamiparib AME mechanisms and potential drug‐drug interaction liability

A phase 1, open-label, single-dose study of the pharmacokinetics of zanubrutinib in subjects with varying degrees of hepatic impairment

The pharmacokinetics and safety of single-dose zanubrutinib (80 mg) were assessed in subjects with mild, moderate, and severe hepatic impairment (n = 6 each, Child-Pugh class A, B, and C) relative to healthy controls (n = 11). Zanubrutinib median T max was 1.25-2.25 h in all groups. Compared to control group, mean zanubrutinib exposure (AUC 0-inf ) in the mild and moderate hepatic impairment groups was increased by 1.1- and 1.2-fold, which is within the range of PK variability for zanubrutinib. The total and unbound AUC of zanubrutinib were 1.60- and 2.9-fold higher in subjects with severe hepatic impairment compared to healthy controls. Terminal half-life was comparable between subjects with hepatic impairment and matched healthy controls. Zanubrutinib was generally well-tolerated when administered as a single, 80-mg dose to subjects in this study. Results of this study will be used, in conjunction with clinical safety and efficacy data, to develop dose recommendations for patients with hepatic impairment

A phase 2 study of the BH3 mimetic BCL2 inhibitor navitoclax (ABT-263) with or without rituximab, in previously untreated B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia

We evaluated the safety and biologic activity of the BH3 mimetic protein, navitoclax, combined with rituximab, in comparison to rituximab alone. One hundred and eighteen patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were randomized to receive eight weekly doses of rituximab (arm A), eight weekly doses of rituximab plus daily navitoclax for 12 weeks (arm B) or eight weekly doses of rituximab plus daily navitoclax until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (arm C). Investigator-assessed overall response rates (complete [CR] and partial [PR]) were 35% (arm A), 55% (arm B, p = 0.19 vs. A) and 70% (arm C, p = 0.0034 vs. A). Patients with del(17p) or high levels of BCL2 had significantly better clinical responses when treated with navitoclax. Navitoclax in combination with rituximab was well tolerated as initial therapy for patients with CLL, yielded higher response rates than rituximab alone and resulted in prolonged progression-free survival with treatment beyond 12 weeks

A phase 2 study of the BH3 mimetic BCL2 inhibitor navitoclax (ABT-263) with or without rituximab, in previously untreated B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia

We evaluated the safety and biologic activity of the BH3 mimetic protein, navitoclax, combined with rituximab, in comparison to rituximab alone. One hundred and eighteen patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were randomized to receive eight weekly doses of rituximab (arm A), eight weekly doses of rituximab plus daily navitoclax for 12 weeks (arm B) or eight weekly doses of rituximab plus daily navitoclax until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity (arm C). Investigator-assessed overall response rates (complete [CR] and partial [PR]) were 35% (arm A), 55% (arm B, p = 0.19 vs. A) and 70% (arm C, p = 0.0034 vs. A). Patients with del(17p) or high levels of BCL2 had significantly better clinical responses when treated with navitoclax. Navitoclax in combination with rituximab was well tolerated as initial therapy for patients with CLL, yielded higher response rates than rituximab alone and resulted in prolonged progression-free survival with treatment beyond 12 weeks

Use of in vitro critical inhibitory concentration, a novel approach to predict in vivo synergistic bactericidal effect of combined amikacin and piperacillin against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a systemic rat infection model

Purpose This study was undertaken to explore the use of in vitro critical inhibitory concentration (CIC) as a surrogate marker relating the pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters to in vivo bactericidal synergistic effect [pharmacodynamic (PD)] of amikacin + piperacillin combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a systemic rat infection model. Methods The in vitro antibacterial activities of amikacin and piperacillin, alone and in combinations at various ratios of the concentrations, were tested against a standard [5 × 105 colony-forming units (CFU)/ml] and a large (1.5 × 108 CFU/ml) inoculum of P. aeruginosa ATCC 9027 using a modified survival-time method. The CIC of each individual antibiotic for the different combinations was determined using a cup-plate method. In vivo studies were performed on Sprague-Dawley rats using a systemic model of infection with P. aeruginosa ATCC 9027. PK profiles and in vivo killing effects of the combination at different dosing ratios were studied. Results An inoculum effect was observed with the antibiotics studied. Synergy was seen against both the inocula at the following concentration ratios: 70% Cami + 30% Cpip and 75% Cami + 25% Cpip, where Cami and Cpip are the concentrations of amikacin and piperacillin to produce a 1000-fold decrease in bacterial population over 5 h, respectively. The CIC values determined corroborated with the order of in vitro bacterial killing observed for the antibiotic combinations. The dosing ratio of 12.6 mg/kg amikacin + 36 mg/kg piperacillin (a 70:30 ratio of the individual doses) exhibited the greatest killing in vivo when compared to the other ratios. The PK–PD relationships were described by simple, linear regression equations using the area under the in vivo killing curve as a PD marker and the AUCICami/CICami + AUCICpip/CICpip, AUCami/CICami + AUCpip/CICpip, Cmax,ami/CICami + Cmax,pip/CICpip, and AUCICami/MICami + AUCICpip/MICpip as PK markers for the amikacin + piperacillin combination. Conclusion The combination of amikacin and piperacillin exhibited synergistic killing effect on P. aeruginosa that could be modeled using CIC as a surrogate marker relating the PK parameters to in vivo bactericidal effect