Clinical consequences of antibody formation, serum concentrations, and HLA-Cw6 status in psoriasis patients on Ustekinumab

Background: Ustekinumab for the treatment of psoriasis is currently administered in a standard dosing regimen. However, some patients tend to benefit from alternative dosing regimens, a step toward personalized medicine. Methods: To investigate the role of ustekinumab serum concentrations, anti-ustekinumab antibodies [AUA] and HLA-Cw6 status as tools for optimizing ustekinumab treatment, a multicenter prospective cohort study was conducted at an academic hospital with affiliated nonacademic hospitals in Belgium (cohort 1) and 2 academic hospitals in the Netherlands (cohort 2 and 3). Patients with plaque-type psoriasis were eligible if treated with ustekinumab for >16 weeks. Serum samples and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index scores were obtained at baseline, week 16, 28, 40, 52, and/or >64 of ustekinumab treatment. Results: A total of 137 patients with 229 observations for serum concentrations and AUA and 61 observations for HLA-Cw6 status were included. Presence of AUA (prevalence of 8.7%) was significantly associated with a diminished clinical response (P = 0.032). The median ustekinumab trough concentration was 0.3 mcg/mL (<0.02-3.80). No differences in serum concentrations were observed between moderate to good responders and nonresponders (P = 0.948). Serum trough concentrations were not affected by methotrexate comedication. Prevalence of HLA-Cw6 positivity was 41% with no statistically significant difference in clinical response between HLA-Cw6-positive and HLA-Cw6-negative patients (P = 0.164). Conclusions: The presence of AUA was associated with treatment failure in this patient population; measurement of AUA may therefore be a candidate marker for personalized pharmacotherapy. The clinical utility of ustekinumab serum trough concentrations or HLA-Cw6 status determination remains less clear. Further exploration on the potential of measuring ustekinumab serum concentrations and other biomarkers in predicting therapy outcomes should be encouraged

How to write a Critically Appraised Topic: evidence to underpin routine clinical practice

Critically appraised topics (CATs) are essential tools for busy clinicians who wish to ensure that their daily clinical practice is underpinned by evidence-based medicine. CATs are short summaries of the most up-to-date, high-quality available evidence that is found using thorough structured methods. They can be used to answer specific, patient-orientated questions that arise recurrently in real-life practice. This article provides readers with a detailed guide to performing their own CATs. It is split into four main sections reflecting the four main steps involved in performing a CAT: formulation of a focused question, a search for the most relevant and highest-quality evidence, critical appraisal of the evidence and application of the results back to the patient scenario. As well as helping to improve patient care on an individual basis by answering specific clinical questions that arise, CATs can help spread and share knowledge with colleagues on an international level through publication in the evidence-based dermatology section of the British Journal of Dermatolog

TREatment of ATopic eczema (TREAT) Registry Taskforce: consensus on how and when to measure the core dataset for atopic eczema treatment research registries.

BackgroundComparative, real-life and long-term evidence on the effectiveness and safety of phototherapy and systemic therapy in moderate-to-severe atopic eczema (AE) is limited. Such data must come from well-designed prospective patient registries. Standardization of data collection is needed for direct comparisons and data pooling.ObjectivesTo reach a consensus on how and when to measure the previously defined domain items of the TREatment of ATopic eczema (TREAT) Registry Taskforce core dataset for research registries for paediatric and adult patients with AE.MethodsProposals for the measurement instruments were based on recommendations of the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative, the existing AE database of TREATgermany, systematic reviews of the literature and expert opinions. The proposals were discussed at three face-to-face consensus meetings, one teleconference and via e-mail. The frequency of follow-up visits was determined by an expert survey.ResultsA total of 16 experts from seven countries participated in the 'how to measure' consensus process and 12 external experts were consulted. A consensus was reached for all domain items on how they should be measured by assigning measurement instruments. A minimum follow-up frequency of initially 4 weeks after commencing treatment, then every 3 months while on treatment and every 6 months while off treatment was defined.ConclusionsThis core dataset for national AE research registries will aid in the comparability and pooling of data across centres and country borders, and enables international collaboration to assess the long-term effectiveness and safety of phototherapy and systemic therapy used in patients with AE. What's already known about this topic? Comparable, real-life and long-term data on the effectiveness and safety of phototherapy and systemic therapy in patients with atopic eczema (AE) are needed. There is a high diversity of outcomes and instruments used in AE research, which require harmonization to enhance comparability and allow data pooling. What does this study add? Our taskforce has reached international consensus on how and when to measure core domain items for national AE research registries. This core dataset is now available for use by researchers worldwide and will aid in the collection of unified data. What are the clinical implications of this work? The data collected through this core dataset will help to gain better insights into the long-term effectiveness and safety of phototherapy and systemic therapy in AE and will provide important information for clinical practice. Standardization of such data collection at the national level will also allow direct data comparisons and pooling across country borders (e.g. in the analysis of treatment-related adverse events that require large patient numbers)

Comparison of three methods for measuring psoriasis severity in clinical studies (Part 2 of 2): use of quality of life to assess construct validity of the Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and Static Physician's Global Assessment

BackgroundSystems for determining psoriasis severity in clinical trials have not been sufficiently validated against patients’ perceived quality of life.ObjectiveTo validate three systems of physician‐determined psoriasis severity (the Lattice System Physician's Global Assessment [LS‐PGA], Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] and static Physician's Global Assessment [sPGA]).MethodsData were from a 24‐week randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, multicenter trial of therapy with oral calcineurin inhibitors in 445 patients. Construct validity was measured by correlations of the three severity scores with patients’ self‐reported quality of life (QoL) from the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and a DLQI item about psoriasis symptoms.ResultsAll severity systems were moderately and positively correlated with QoL, indicating construct validity. QoL was most consistently related to physicians’ assessments of body surface area involved with psoriasis (iBSA) followed by, in the order of consistency, plaque elevation, erythema and scale.ConclusionsThe LS‐PGA weights iBSA and aspects of plaque morphology in concert with their relative effects on QoL. The LS‐PGA, sPGA and PASI are validated by their relationship to QoL in a clinical trial.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/111946/1/jdv12861.pd

How to use the HOME Core Outcome Set for atopic dermatitis trials - a users' guide

The Harmonizing Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) initiative has agreed upon the core outcome set for use in atopic dermatitis (AD) clinical trials, but additional guidance is needed to maximise uptake of the core set. This article provides answers to some of the commonly asked questions about using the HOME core outcome set. It also provides data to aid interpretation of trial results and to support sample size calculations for future trials. By encouraging adoption of the core outcome set and facilitating consistent reporting of outcome data, we hope that results of eczema trials will be more comprehensive and readily combined in meta-analyses and patient care will be improved

Patients with atopic dermatitis with filaggrin loss-of-function mutations show good but lower responses to immunosuppressive treatment

Filaggrin (FLG) mutations are a strong risk factor to develop atopic dermatitis (AD). However, the relationship between FLG mutations and treatment outcome in AD has not been thoroughly studied. To investigate whether FLG mutations influence immunosuppressive treatment outcome in AD, we studied the effect of FLG mutations in patients with severe AD participating in a single blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT) with methotrexate (MTX) or azathioprine (AZA) during a 24 weeks treatment regimen.((1)) Two years after randomization buccal mucosa swabs were collected from 36 of the 42 RCT patients (86%) to determine the FLG genotype status (R501X, 2282del4, R2447X, S3247X and 3321delA mutations). This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserve