Global overview of the management of acute cholecystitis during the COVID-19 pandemic (CHOLECOVID study)

Background: This study provides a global overview of the management of patients with acute cholecystitis during the initial phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: CHOLECOVID is an international, multicentre, observational comparative study of patients admitted to hospital with acute cholecystitis during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data on management were collected for a 2-month study interval coincident with the WHO declaration of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and compared with an equivalent pre-pandemic time interval. Mediation analysis examined the influence of SARS-COV-2 infection on 30-day mortality. Results: This study collected data on 9783 patients with acute cholecystitis admitted to 247 hospitals across the world. The pandemic was associated with reduced availability of surgical workforce and operating facilities globally, a significant shift to worse severity of disease, and increased use of conservative management. There was a reduction (both absolute and proportionate) in the number of patients undergoing cholecystectomy from 3095 patients (56.2 per cent) pre-pandemic to 1998 patients (46.2 per cent) during the pandemic but there was no difference in 30-day all-cause mortality after cholecystectomy comparing the pre-pandemic interval with the pandemic (13 patients (0.4 per cent) pre-pandemic to 13 patients (0.6 per cent) pandemic; P = 0.355). In mediation analysis, an admission with acute cholecystitis during the pandemic was associated with a non-significant increased risk of death (OR 1.29, 95 per cent c.i. 0.93 to 1.79, P = 0.121). Conclusion: CHOLECOVID provides a unique overview of the treatment of patients with cholecystitis across the globe during the first months of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. The study highlights the need for system resilience in retention of elective surgical activity. Cholecystectomy was associated with a low risk of mortality and deferral of treatment results in an increase in avoidable morbidity that represents the non-COVID cost of this pandemic

eHealth cognitieve gedragstherapie voor patiënten met chronische somatische aandoeningen

-based cognitive behavioral therapy for patients with chronic somatic conditions Many patients with chronic somatic conditions regularly experience impairments in physical and psychological functioning in their daily life. A way to support these patients is to offer online programs based on cognitive behavioral therapy (Internet-based cognitive behavioral therapy; ICBT). Although a substantial evidence base already exists regarding the effectiveness of ICBT in treating, for example, depressive symptoms, research on ICBT for chronic somatic conditions is still upcoming. In recent years, a growing number of randomized controlled trials were published that examined the effectiveness of ICBT in various chronic somatic conditions. To systematically and quantitatively evaluate the results of these studies, a metaanalysis was conducted, the results of which are discussed in this article. Results indicated that ICBT is also overall effective for chronic somatic conditions, with small to moderate effect sizes. Larger effects were occasionally found for disease-specific outcomes such as disease symptoms and disease-specific quality of life. A longer treatment duration was found to be marginally related to a larger decrease in depressive symptoms. In addition to the results of the meta-analysis, this article provides an overview of the recent literature regarding several clinically relevant ICBT topics: cost-effectiveness, guided ICBT interventions versus self-help, the role of treatment duration, and optimal design and implementation of eHealth interventions.FSW - Self-regulation models for health behavior and psychopathology - ou

Reexamining personal, social, and cultural influences on compliance behavior in the United States, Poland, and Hong Kong

Researchers have extended the literature on strategies of gaining compliance with a request to incorporate cultural variations into the analytic framework. In the present investigation, the authors sought to go beyond previous studies of the factors increasing compliance rates by reexamining how researchers conceptualize and measure personal, social, and cultural influences on compliance behavior in the United States, Poland, and Hong Kong. The authors found that different levels of compliance were affected by culture, principles of influence, and the individual\u27s personal orientation of idiocentrism/allo-centrism (I/A). In the present study, the authors extended previous cross-cultural work by decomposing the I/A into 2 separate individual difference variables: normative perceptions and evaluative perceptions. The interaction of person and situation on compliance showed the power of situational demands and the strength of different aspects of personal collectivism. Different patterns of compliance at the culture level revealed the importance of culture in shaping this behavioral tendency. Thus, the authors\u27 integration of personal, social, and cultural influences provided an interactive model to help researchers explain compliance more comprehensively