Activation of RegB endoribonuclease by S1 ribosomal protein requires an 11 nt conserved sequence

The T4 RegB endoribonuclease cleaves specifically in the middle of the -GGAG- sequence, leading to inactivation and degradation of early phage mRNAs. In vitro, RegB activity is very weak but can be enhanced 10- to 100-fold by the Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S1. Not all RNAs carrying the GGAG motif are cleaved by RegB, suggesting that additional information is required to obtain a complete RegB target site. In this work, we find that in the presence of S1, the RegB target site is an 11 nt long single-stranded RNA carrying the 100% conserved GGA triplet at the 5′ end and a degenerate, A-rich, consensus sequence immediately downstream. Our data support the notion that RegB alone recognizes only the trinucleotide GGA, which it cleaves very inefficiently, and that stimulation of RegB activity by S1 depends on the nucleotide immediately 3′ to -GGA-

mRNA degradation and maturation in prokaryotes: the global players

Edited by J. F. Schreiber Esslingen. Part of Dodel-Port Atlas.Erythrotis Beddomei, Hooker f

The balance between protein synthesis and degradation in chloroplasts determines leaf variegation in Arabidopsis yellow variegated mutants

An Arabidopsis thaliana leaf-variegated mutant yellow variegated2 (var2) results from loss of FtsH2, a major component of the chloroplast FtsH complex. FtsH is an ATP-dependent metalloprotease in thylakoid membranes and degrades several chloroplastic proteins. To understand the role of proteolysis by FtsH and mechanisms leading to leaf variegation, we characterized the second-site recessive mutation fu-gaeri1 (fug1) that suppressed leaf variegation of var2. Map-based cloning and subsequent characterization of the FUG1 locus demonstrated that it encodes a protein homologous to prokaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (cpIF2) located in chloroplasts. We show evidence that cpIF2 indeed functions in chloroplast protein synthesis in vivo. Suppression of leaf variegation by fug1 is observed not only in var2 but also in var1 (lacking FtsH5) and var1 var2. Thus, suppression of leaf variegation caused by loss of FtsHs is most likely attributed to reduced protein synthesis in chloroplasts. This hypothesis was further supported by the observation that another viable mutation in chloroplast translation elongation factor G also suppresses leaf variegation in var2. We propose that the balance between protein synthesis and degradation is one of the determining factors leading to the variegated phenotype in Arabidopsis leaves

The Balance between Protein Synthesis and Degradation in Chloroplasts Determines Leaf Variegation in Arabidopsis yellow variegated Mutants.

International audienceAn Arabidopsis thaliana leaf-variegated mutant yellow variegated2 (var2) results from loss of FtsH2, a major component of the chloroplast FtsH complex. FtsH is an ATP-dependent metalloprotease in thylakoid membranes and degrades several chloroplastic proteins. To understand the role of proteolysis by FtsH and mechanisms leading to leaf variegation, we characterized the second-site recessive mutation fu-gaeri1 (fug1) that suppressed leaf variegation of var2. Map-based cloning and subsequent characterization of the FUG1 locus demonstrated that it encodes a protein homologous to prokaryotic translation initiation factor 2 (cpIF2) located in chloroplasts. We show evidence that cpIF2 indeed functions in chloroplast protein synthesis in vivo. Suppression of leaf variegation by fug1 is observed not only in var2 but also in var1 (lacking FtsH5) and var1 var2. Thus, suppression of leaf variegation caused by loss of FtsHs is most likely attributed to reduced protein synthesis in chloroplasts. This hypothesis was further supported by the observation that another viable mutation in chloroplast translation elongation factor G also suppresses leaf variegation in var2. We propose that the balance between protein synthesis and degradation is one of the determining factors leading to the variegated phenotype in Arabidopsis leaves

Dynamic Membrane Localization of RNase Y in Bacillus subtilis

All living organisms must degrade mRNA to adapt gene expression to changing environments. In bacteria, initiation of mRNA decay generally occurs through an endonucleolytic cleavage. In the Gram-positive model organism Bacillus subtilis and probably many other bacteria, the key enzyme for this task is RNase Y, which is anchored at the inner cell membrane. While this pseudocompartmentalization appears coherent with translation occurring primarily at the cell periphery, our knowledge on the distribution and dynamics of RNase Y in living cells is very scarce. Here, we show that RNase Y moves rapidly along the membrane in the form of dynamic short-lived foci. These foci become more abundant and increase in size following transcription arrest, suggesting that they do not constitute the most active form of the nuclease. This contrasts with RNase E, the major decay-initiating RNase in E. coli, where it was shown that formation of foci is dependent on the presence of RNA substrates. We also show that a protein complex (Y-complex) known to influence the specificity of RNase Y activity in vivo is capable of shifting the assembly status of RNase Y toward fewer and smaller complexes. This highlights fundamental differences between RNase E- and RNase Y-based degradation machineries.Metabolic turnover of mRNA is fundamental to the control of gene expression in all organisms, notably in fast-adapting prokaryotes. In many bacteria, RNase Y initiates global mRNA decay via an endonucleolytic cleavage, as shown in the Gram-positive model organism Bacillus subtilis. This enzyme is tethered to the inner cell membrane, a pseudocompartmentalization coherent with its task of initiating mRNA cleavage/maturation of mRNAs that are translated at the cell periphery. Here, we used total internal reflection fluorescence microscopy (TIRFm) and single-particle tracking (SPT) to visualize RNase Y and analyze its distribution and dynamics in living cells. We find that RNase Y diffuses rapidly at the membrane in the form of dynamic short-lived foci. Unlike RNase E, the major decay-initiating RNase in Escherichia coli, the formation of foci is not dependent on the presence of RNA substrates. On the contrary, RNase Y foci become more abundant and increase in size following transcription arrest, suggesting that they do not constitute the most active form of the nuclease. The Y-complex of three proteins (YaaT, YlbF, and YmcA) has previously been shown to play an important role for RNase Y activity in vivo. We demonstrate that Y-complex mutations have an effect similar to but much stronger than that of depletion of RNA in increasing the number and size of RNase Y foci at the membrane. Our data suggest that the Y-complex shifts the assembly status of RNase Y toward fewer and smaller complexes, thereby increasing cleavage efficiency of complex substrates like polycistronic mRNAs

Natural antisense transcription of presenilin in sea urchin reveals a possible role for natural antisense transcription in the general control of gene expression during development

International audienceOne presenilin gene (PSEN) is expressed in the sea urchin embryo, in the vegetal pole of the gastrula and then mainly in cilia cells located around the digestive system of the pluteus, as we recently have reported. PSEN expression must be accurately regulated for correct execution of these two steps of development. While investigating PSEN expression changes in embryos after expansion of endoderm with LiCl or of ectoderm with Zn 2+ by whole-mount in situ hybridization (WISH) and quantitative PCR (qPCR), we detected natural antisense transcription of PSEN. We then found that Endo16 and Wnt5, markers of endo-mesoderm, and of Hnf6 and Gsc, markers of ectoderm, are also sense and antisense transcribed. We discuss that general gene expression could depend on both sense and antisense transcription. This mechanism, together with the PSEN gene, should be included in gene regulatory networks (GRNs) that theorize diverse processes in this species. We suggest that it would also be relevant to investigate natural antisense transcription of PSEN in the field of Alzheimer's disease (AD) where the role of human PSEN1 and PSEN2 is well known