18 research outputs found

    Single-crystal to cingle-crystal addition of H2to [Ir(iPr-PONOP)(propene)][BArF4] and comparison between solid-state and solution reactivity

    Get PDF
    The EPSRC (EP/M024210/2, EP/T019867/1), SCG Chemicals, The Clarendon Trust, The Leverhulme Trust (RPG-2020-184), Diamond Light Source for funding (PhD studentship to AM).The reactivity of the Ir(I) PONOP pincer complex [Ir(iPr-PONOP)(η2-propene)][BArF4], 6, [iPr-PONOP = 2,6-(iPr2PO)2C6H3N, ArF= 3,5-(CF3)2C6H3] was studied in solution and the solid state, both experimentally, using molecular density functional theory (DFT) and periodic-DFT computational methods, as well as in situ single-crystal to single-crystal (SC-SC) techniques. Complex 6 is synthesized in solution from sequential addition of H2and propene, and then the application of vacuum, to [Ir(iPr-PONOP)(η2-COD)][BArF4], 1, a reaction manifold that proceeds via the Ir(III) dihydrogen/dihydride complex [Ir(iPr-PONOP)(H2)H2][BArF4], 2, and the Ir(III) dihydride propene complex [Ir(iPr-PONOP)(η2-propene)H2][BArF4], 7, respectively. In solution (CD2Cl2) 6 undergoes rapid reaction with H2to form dihydride 7 and then a slow (3 d) onward reaction to give dihydrogen/dihydride 2 and propane. DFT calculations on the molecular cation in solution support this slow, but productive, reaction, with a calculated barrier to rate-limiting propene migratory insertion of 24.8 kcal/mol. In the solid state single-crystals of 6 also form complex 7 on addition of H2in an SC-SC reaction, but unlike in solution the onward reaction (i.e., insertion) does not occur, as confirmed by labeling studies using D2. The solid-state structure of 7 reveals that, on addition of H2to 6, the PONOP ligand moves by 90° within a cavity of [BArF4]-anions rather than the alkene moving. Periodic DFT calculations support the higher barrier to insertion in the solid state (ΔG‡= 26.0 kcal/mol), demonstrating that the single-crystal environment gates onward reactivity compared to solution. H2addition to 6 to form 7 is reversible in both solution and the solid state, but in the latter crystallinity is lost. A rare example of a sigma amine-borane pincer complex, [Ir(iPr-PONOP)H2(η1-H3B·NMe3)][BArF4], 5, is also reported as part of these studies.Peer reviewe

    Transition Metal-Free Catalytic C−H Zincation and C−H Alumination

    No full text
    C−H metalation is the most efficient method to prepare aryl–zinc and –aluminum complexes that are highly useful nucleophiles. Virtually all C–H metalation routes to form Al or Zn organometallic reagents require stoichiometric, strong Brønsted bases with no base-catalyzed reactions reported, to our knowledge. Herein we present a catalytic C–H metalation process to form aryl-zinc and aryl-aluminum complexes that uses only simple amine bases (e.g., Et3N) in sub-stoichiometric quantity (10 mol%). Key to this approach is coupling an endergonic C–H metalation step using a [(-diketiminate)MNR3]+ (M = Zn or Al–Me) electrophile with a sufficiently exergonic dehydrocoupling step between the acidic ammonium salt by-product of C–H metalation ([(R3N)H]+) and a Zn–H or Al–Me containing complex. This step, forming H2/MeH, makes the overall cycle exergonic while also generating more of the key cationic metal electrophile. Mechanistic studies supported by DFT calculations revealed metal-specific dehydrocoupling pathways, with the divergent reactivity shown to be due to the different metal valency (which impacts the accessibility of amine-free cationic complexes) and steric environment. Notably, dehydrocoupling in the zinc system proceeds through a ligand-mediated pathway involving protonation of the -diketiminate C position. In this step the magnitude of the key barrier is dependent on the steric bulk of the spectator ligand, with bulkier ligands actually affording lower barriers. This catalytic approach to arene C−H metalation has the potential to be applicable to other main group metals and ligands, thus will facilitate the synthesis of these important organometallic compounds

    CCDC 2083544: Experimental Crystal Structure Determination

    No full text
    RAMBEQ : tris(μ-hydrido)-bis(methyl)-tris(triphenylphosphine)-ruthenium-di-zinc tetrakis[3,5-bis(trifluoromethyl)phenyl]borat

    Understanding and Expanding Zinc Cation/Amine Frustrated Lewis Pair Catalyzed C–H Borylation

    No full text
    [(NacNac)Zn(DMT)][B(C6F5)4], 1, (NacNac = {(2,6-iPr2H3C6)N(CH3)C}2CH), DMT = N,N-dimethyl-4-toluidine), was synthesized via two routes starting from either (NacNac)ZnEt or (NacNac)ZnH. Complex 1 is an effective (pre)catalyst for the C–H borylation of (hetero)arenes using catecholborane (CatBH) with H2 the only byproduct. The scope included weakly activated substrates such as 2-bromothiophene and benzothiophene. Computational studies elucidated a plausible reaction mechanism that has an overall free energy span of 22.4 kcal/mol (for N-methylindole borylation), consistent with experimental observations. The calculated mechanism starting from 1 proceeds via the displacement of DMT by CatBH to form [(NacNac)Zn(CatBH)]+, D, in which CatBH binds via an oxygen to zinc which makes the boron center much more electrophilic based on the energy of the CatB-based LUMO. Combinations of D and DMT act as a frustrated Lewis pair (FLP) to effect C–H borylation in a stepwise process via an arenium cation that is deprotonated by DMT. Subsequent B–H/[H-DMT]+ dehydrocoupling and displacement from the coordination sphere of zinc of CatBAr by CatBH closes the cycle. The calculations also revealed a possible catalyst decomposition pathway involving hydride transfer from boron to zinc to form (NacNac)ZnH which reacts with CatBH to ultimately form Zn(0). In addition, the key rate-limiting transition states all involve the base, thus fine-tuning of the steric and electronic parameters of the base enabled a further minor enhancement in the C–H borylation activity of the system. Outlining the mechanism for all steps of this FLP-mediated process will facilitate the development of other main group FLP catalysts for C–H borylation and other transformations
    corecore