A Randomized, Double-Blind Noninferiority Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Cabozantinib Tablet at 60 mg Per Day Compared with the Cabozantinib Capsule at 140 mg Per Day in Patients with Progressive, Metastatic Medullary Thyroid Cancer

Cabozantinib; Medullary thyroid cancer; Tyrosine kinase inhibitorCabozantinib; Càncer medul·lar de tiroides; Inhibidor de la tirosina cinasaCabozantinib; Cáncer medular de tiroides; Inhibidor de la tirosina cinasaBackground: Cabozantinib inhibits pathways involved in medullary thyroid cancer (MTC). Cabozantinib is approved as 140 mg/day in capsules for MTC and 60 mg/day in tablets for other solid tumors. This study compared the two doses in progressive metastatic MTC. Methods: In this Phase 4, randomized, double-blind noninferiority (NI) trial (NCT01896479), patients with progressive metastatic MTC were randomized 1:1 to cabozantinib 60 mg/day tablet or 140 mg/day capsules. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent radiology committee (BIRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v1.1. NI would be concluded if the upper 95% confidence interval [CI] for the PFS hazard ratio (HR) was less than the NI margin, 1.58. The secondary end point was objective response rate (ORR) by BIRC per RECIST v1.1; additional end points included safety and pharmacokinetics. Results: At data cutoff (July 15, 2020), 247 patients were randomized to the 60 mg/day tablet arm (n = 123) and the 140 mg/day capsules arm (n = 124). NI was not met (median PFS 11.0 months vs. 13.9 months in the 60 and 140 mg/day arms [HR 1.24; CI 0.90–1.70; p = 0.19]). The ORR was 33% in both arms. Generally, adverse event (AE) incidence was lower in the 60 mg/day arm (Grade 3/4, 63% vs. 72%), as were dose reductions (69% vs. 81%) and treatment discontinuations due to AEs (23% vs. 36%). Initially, cabozantinib plasma concentrations were higher in the 140 mg/day arm but became similar between arms at later time points. Conclusions: PFS NI of the cabozantinib 60 mg/day tablet vs. 140 mg/day capsules was not met. The 60 mg/day tablet had the same ORR and lower rates of AEs.This work was supported by Exelixis, Inc., Alameda, CA, USA (no grant number). Exelixis was involved in the study design, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, the writing of the report, and the decision to submit for publication

Use of lenvatinib in the treatment of radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective for daily practice

Differentiated thyroid cancer; Lenvatinib; ToxicityCáncer diferenciado de tiroides; Lenvatinib; ToxicidadCàncer diferenciat de tiroide; Lenvatinib; ToxicitatBackground Most thyroid cancers of follicular origin have a favorable outcome. Only a small percentage of patients will develop metastatic disease, some of which will become radioiodine refractory (RAI-R). Important challenges to ensure the best therapeutic outcomes include proper, timely, and appropriate diagnosis; decisions on local, systemic treatments; management of side effects of therapies; and a good relationship between the specialist, patients, and caregivers. Methods With the aim of providing suggestions that can be useful in everyday practice, a multidisciplinary group of experts organized the following document, based on their shared clinical experience with patients with RAI-R differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) undergoing treatment with lenvatinib. The main areas covered are patient selection, initiation of therapy, follow-up, and management of adverse events. Conclusions It is essential to provide guidance for the management of RAI-R DTC patients with systemic therapies, and especially lenvatinib, since compliance and adherence to treatment are fundamental to achieve the best outcomes. While the therapeutic landscape in RAI-R DTC is evolving, with new targeted therapies, immunotherapy, etc., lenvatinib is expected to remain a first-line treatment and mainstay of therapy for several years in the vast majority of patients and settings. The guidance herein covers baseline work-up and initiation of systemic therapy, relevance of symptoms, multidisciplinary assessment, and patient education. Practical information based on expert experience is also given for the starting dose of lenvatinib, follow-up and monitoring, as well as the management of adverse events and discontinuation and reinitiating of therapy. The importance of patient engagement is also stressed.Eisai Europe sponsored the expert panel and editorial assistance providing medical writing support. Eisai Europe had no editorial control over this manuscript and the views expressed are those of the authors. JC, DD, CD, SL, ML, RNM, KN, SS,GS, and LDL received an honorarium from Eisai Europe for time attending the panel and for editorial contribution to the present manuscript. Beate Bartès, as president of Association Vivre sans Thyroïde, received a donation from Eisai Europe. Kate Farnell received, on behalf of Butterfly Thyroid Cancer Trust, a donation from Eisai Europe

Kinase inhibitors for advanced medullary thyroid carcinoma

The recent availability of molecular targeted therapies leads to a reconsideration of the treatment strategy for patients with distant metastases from medullary thyroid carcinoma. In patients with progressive disease, treatment with kinase inhibitors should be offered

Papillary thyroid microcarcinoma: time to shift from surgery to active surveillance?

The incidence of differentiated thyroid cancer is increasing greatly in high-income countries. Roughly 50% of this increase is attributable to the identification of intrathyroidal papillary thyroid microcarcinomas. Since mortality associated with these tumours remains low and stable, the increasing diagnosis has led to concerns about overdiagnosis and overtreatment. Management of papillary thyroid microcarcinomas should take into account the reported absence of mortality when diagnosed in the absence of lymph node metastases and distant metastases, as shown even in recent studies promoting active surveillance; a low recurrence rate of 1-5%; and the risk of permanent complications from surgery that cannot be decreased to less than 1-3%, even in high-volume tertiary care centres with experienced surgeons. On the basis of these data, active surveillance with curative intent, in which active treatment is delayed until the cancer shows signs of significant progression to avoid side-effects of treatment, should be considered in properly selected patients

Current perspectives on the management of patients with advanced RET-driven thyroid cancer in Europe

The incidence of thyroid cancer is increasing worldwide with the disease burden in Europe second only to that in Asia. In the last several decades, molecular pathways central to the pathogenesis of thyroid cancer have revealed a spectrum of targetable kinases/kinase receptors and oncogenic drivers characteristic of each histologic subtype, such as differentiated thyroid cancer, including papillary, follicular, and medullary thyroid cancer. Oncogenic alterations identified include B-Raf proto-oncogene (BRAF) fusions and mutations, neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions, and rearranged during transfection (RET) receptor tyrosine kinase fusion and mutations. Multikinase inhibitors (MKIs) targeting RET in addition to multiple other kinases, such as sorafenib, lenvatinib and cabozantinib, have shown favourable activity in advanced radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer or RET-altered medullary thyroid cancer; however, the clinical utility of MKI RET inhibition is limited by off-target toxicity resulting in high rates of dose reduction and drug discontinuation. Newer and selective RET inhibitors, selpercatinib and pralsetinib, have demonstrated potent efficacy and favourable toxicity profiles in clinical trials in the treatment of RET-driven advanced thyroid cancer and are now a therapeutic option in some clinical settings. Importantly, the optimal benefits of available specific targeted treatments for advanced RET-driven thyroid cancer require genetic testing. Prior to the initiation of systemic therapy, and in treatment-naïve patients, RET inhibitors may be offered as first-line therapy if a RET alteration is found, supported by a multidisciplinary team approach

Use of lenvatinib in the treatment of radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer: a multidisciplinary perspective for daily practice

Background: Most thyroid cancers of follicular origin have a favorable outcome. Only a small percentage of patients will develop metastatic disease, some of which will become radioiodine refractory (RAI-R). Important challenges to ensure the best therapeutic outcomes include proper, timely, and appropriate diagnosis; decisions on local, systemic treatments; management of side effects of therapies; and a good relationship between the specialist, patients, and caregivers. Methods: With the aim of providing suggestions that can be useful in ev eryday practice, a multidisciplinary group of experts organized the following document, based on their shared clinical experience with patients with RAI-R differentiat ed thyroid cancer (DTC) undergoing treatment with lenvatinib. The main areas covered are patient selection, initiation of therapy, follow-up, and management of adverse events. Conclusions: It is essential to provide guidance for the management of RAI-R DTC patients with systemic therapies, and especially lenvatinib, since compliance and adherence to treatment are fundamental to achieve the best outcomes. Whil e the therapeutic landscape in RAI-R DTC is evolving, with new targeted therapies, immunotherapy, etc., lenvatinib is expected to remain a first-line treatment and mainstay of therapy for several years in the vast majority of patients and settings. The guidance herein covers baseline work-up and initiation of systemic therapy, relevance of symptoms, multidisciplinary assessment, and patient education. Practical information based on expert experience is also given for the starting dose of lenvatinib, follow-up and monitoring, as well as the management of adverse events and discontinuation and reinitiating of therapy. The importance of patient engagement is also stressed

A Randomized Study of Lenvatinib 18 mg vs 24 mg in Patients With Radioiodine-Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Background: Lenvatinib is a multikinase inhibitor approved to treat radioiodine-refractory differentiated thyroid cancer (RR-DTC) at a starting dose of 24 mg/day. This study explored, in a double-blinded fashion, whether a starting dose of 18 mg/day would provide comparable efficacy with reduced toxicity. Methods: Patients with RR-DTC were randomized to lenvatinib 24 mg/day or 18 mg/day. The primary efficacy endpoint was objective response rate as of week 24 (ORRwk24); the odds ratio noninferiority margin was 0.4. The primary safety endpoint was frequency of grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) as of week 24. Tumors were assessed using RECIST v1.1. TEAEs were monitored and recorded. Results: The ORRwk24 was 57.3% (95% CI 46.1, 68.5) in the lenvatinib 24-mg arm and 40.3% (95% CI 29.3, 51.2) in the lenvatinib 18-mg arm, with an odds ratio (18/24 mg) of 0.50 (95% CI 0.26, 0.96). As of week 24, the rates of TEAEs grade ≥3 were 61.3% in the lenvatinib 24-mg arm and 57.1% in the lenvatinib 18-mg arm, a difference of -4.2% (95% CI -19.8, 11.4). Conclusion: A starting dose of lenvatinib 18 mg/day did not demonstrate noninferiority compared to a starting dose of 24 mg/day as assessed by ORRwk24 in patients with RR-DTC. The results represent a clinically meaningful difference in ORRwk24. The safety profile was comparable, with no clinically relevant difference between arms. These results support the continued use of the approved starting dose of lenvatinib 24 mg/day in patients with RR-DTC and adjusting the dose as necessary. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02702388

Role of I131 and Scintigraphic Imaging in the Management of Differentiated Thyroid Cancer

Le traitement initial des cancers différenciés de la thyroïde (CTD) consiste en une thyroïdectomie totale suivie, dans de nombreux cas par l’administration d’iode 131. Après thyroïdectomie totale, un traitement par iode 131 est indiqué en fonction des caractéristiques tumorales initiales. Chez les patients à risque élevé de rechute il est recommandé d’administrer une forte activité d’iode 131. Chez les patients à très faible risque il est recommandé de ne pas administrer d’iode 131. Dans le groupe intermédiaire, il a été montré par deux études prospectives multicentriques randomisées (ESTIMABL et HILO) qu’une activité de 1,1 GBq (30 mCi) administrée après TSHrh (Thyroid Stimulating Hormon recombinante humaine) était adaptée. La désescalade thérapeutique se poursuit dans le cadre d’un autre essai prospectif randomisé (ESTIMABL 2) comparant une activité de 30 mCi après injection de TSHrh à une simple surveillance. Chez les patients avec maladie résiduelle la tomographie par émission de positon couplée à un scanner (TEP/TDM) au fluorodesoxyglucose (FDG) est un examen clé avec une valeur à la fois diagnostique et thérapeutique. Les fixations de FDG permettent de localiser la maladie résiduelle, surtout lorsqu’elle ne capte pas l’iode. Chez les patients dont le site de récidive n’est pas déterminé par l’échographie cervicale, la TEP/TDM au FDG est plus sensible que la scintigraphie post-thérapeutique réalisée après administration d’une forte activité d’iode 131 (dite activité empirique) et est considéré comme l’examen de première intention. La réalisation d’une stimulation par TSHrh avant la TEP au FDG augmente le nombre de lésions détectées et donc sa sensibilité sans que les modifications thérapeutiques qui en découlent soient néanmoins significatives. Le rôle de la TEP FDG dans la sélection des patients nécessitant un traitement par inhibiteur de tyrosine kinase et dans l’évaluation antitumorale des inhibiteurs de tyrosine kinase reste à démontrer. L’utilisation d’ITK pour ré-induire les fixations d’iode 131 sont une voie majeure de développement pour les patients ayant une maladie réfractaire à l’iode 131.Initial treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer is based on a total thyroidectomy and in many cases on the administration of radioactive iodine. Following total thyroidectomy, radioactive iodine is given, based on the primary tumor characteristics. In case of a very low risk of recurrence it is recommended not to give radioactive treatment. In case of high risk patients, a high activity of radioactive iodine is given after TSH stimulation. In case of intermediate risk patients, two randomized prospective studies (ESTIMABL and HILO) have shown that an activity of 1,1 GBq (30 mCi) given after rhTSH (recombinant human Thyroid Stimulating Hormon) was adequate. A further step is taken towards less treatment has now been undertaken with the ESTIMABL2 study, a prospective randomized study comparing a treatment with 1,1 GBq (30 mCi) of radioactive iodine treatment to follow-up without ablation. In patients with persistent disease, positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) is a key examination used for its diagnostic and prognostic value. Foci of FDG uptake can localize residual disease, especially when it does not take up radioactive iodine. In patients in whom the site of recurrence remains unknown after a neck ultrasonography PET/CT with FDG is more sensitive than a post-therapeutic whole body scan performed after the administration of a high activity of radioactive iodine (empiric iodine) and should be considered as the first examination to perform. Injections of rhTSH before doing FDG PET/CT allow to increase the number of lesions detected, however the treatment changes linked to this preparation remains minor. The role of FDG PET/CT in the selection of patients to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and to assess metabolic tumor response remains to be explored. The use of TKI to reinduce radioactive iodine uptake is a major research subject for patients with radioactive iodine refractory disease

ETUDE PRONOSTIQUE DES CANCERS MEDULLAIRES DE LA THYROIDE SURVENANT DANS LE CADRE D'UN SYNDROME DE NEOPLASIE ENDOCRINIENNE MULTIPLE DE TYPE 2B (ANALYSE RETROSPECTIVE DE 18 CAS SUIVIS DANS UN SEUL CENTRE)

PARIS6-Bibl. St Antoine CHU (751122104) / SudocPARIS-BIUM (751062103) / SudocSudocFranceF

Place de l'iode 131 et de l'imagerie scintigraphique dans la prise en charge des cancers différenciés de la thyroïde

Le traitement initial des cancers différenciés de la thyroïde (CTD) consiste en une thyroïdectomie totale suivie, dans de nombreux cas par l administration d iode 131. Après thyroïdectomie totale, un traitement par iode 131 est indiqué en fonction des caractéristiques tumorales initiales. Chez les patients à risque élevé de rechute il est recommandé d administrer une forte activité d iode 131. Chez les patients à très faible risque il est recommandé de ne pas administrer d iode 131. Dans le groupe intermédiaire, il a été montré par deux études prospectives multicentriques randomisées (ESTIMABL et HILO) qu une activité de 1,1 GBq (30 mCi) administrée après TSHrh (Thyroid Stimulating Hormon recombinante humaine) était adaptée. La désescalade thérapeutique se poursuit dans le cadre d un autre essai prospectif randomisé (ESTIMABL 2) comparant une activité de 30 mCi après injection de TSHrh à une simple surveillance. Chez les patients avec maladie résiduelle la tomographie par émission de positon couplée à un scanner (TEP/TDM) au fluorodesoxyglucose (FDG) est un examen clé avec une valeur à la fois diagnostique et thérapeutique. Les fixations de FDG permettent de localiser la maladie résiduelle, surtout lorsqu elle ne capte pas l iode. Chez les patients dont le site de récidive n est pas déterminé par l échographie cervicale, la TEP/TDM au FDG est plus sensible que la scintigraphie post-thérapeutique réalisée après administration d une forte activité d iode 131 (dite activité empirique) et est considéré comme l examen de première intention. La réalisation d une stimulation par TSHrh avant la TEP au FDG augmente le nombre de lésions détectées et donc sa sensibilité sans que les modifications thérapeutiques qui en découlent soient néanmoins significatives. Le rôle de la TEP FDG dans la sélection des patients nécessitant un traitement par inhibiteur de tyrosine kinase et dans l évaluation antitumorale des inhibiteurs de tyrosine kinase reste à démontrer. L utilisation d ITK pour ré-induire les fixations d iode 131 sont une voie majeure de développement pour les patients ayant une maladie réfractaire à l iode 131.Initial treatment of differentiated thyroid cancer is based on a total thyroidectomy and in many cases on the administration of radioactive iodine. Following total thyroidectomy, radioactive iodine is given, based on the primary tumor characteristics. In case of a very low risk of recurrence it is recommended not to give radioactive treatment. In case of high risk patients, a high activity of radioactive iodine is given after TSH stimulation. In case of intermediate risk patients, two randomized prospective studies (ESTIMABL and HILO) have shown that an activity of 1,1 GBq (30 mCi) given after rhTSH (recombinant human Thyroid Stimulating Hormon) was adequate. A further step is taken towards less treatment has now been undertaken with the ESTIMABL2 study, a prospective randomized study comparing a treatment with 1,1 GBq (30 mCi) of radioactive iodine treatment to follow-up without ablation. In patients with persistent disease, positron emission tomography with computed tomography (PET/CT) is a key examination used for its diagnostic and prognostic value. Foci of FDG uptake can localize residual disease, especially when it does not take up radioactive iodine. In patients in whom the site of recurrence remains unknown after a neck ultrasonography PET/CT with FDG is more sensitive than a post-therapeutic whole body scan performed after the administration of a high activity of radioactive iodine (empiric iodine) and should be considered as the first examination to perform. Injections of rhTSH before doing FDG PET/CT allow to increase the number of lesions detected, however the treatment changes linked to this preparation remains minor. The role of FDG PET/CT in the selection of patients to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) and to assess metabolic tumor response remains to be explored. The use of TKI to reinduce radioactive iodine uptake is a major research subject for patients with radioactive iodine refractory disease.PARIS11-SCD-Bib. électronique (914719901) / SudocSudocFranceF