8 research outputs found
Chronic Diseases in North-West Tanzania and Southern Uganda. Public Perceptions of Terminologies, Aetiologies, Symptoms and Preferred Management
Research outputs produced to support a quantitative population survey, quantitative health facility survey, focus groups and in-depth interviews performed by the projec
Scepticism towards insecticide treated mosquito nets for malaria control in rural community in north-western Tanzania
Despite existence of effective tools for malaria control, malaria
continues to be one of the leading killer diseases especially among
under-five year children and pregnant women in poor rural populations
of Sub Saharan Africa. In Tanzania Mainland the disease contributes to
39.4% of the total OPD attendances. In terms of mortality, malaria is
known to be responsible for more than one third of deaths among
children of age below 5 years and also contributes for up to one fifth
of deaths among pregnant women. This paper is based on a study
conducted in a rural community along the shores of Lake Victoria in
Mwanza region, North-Western Tanzania. The study explores reasons for
scepticism and low uptake of insecticide treated mosquito nets (ITNs)
that were promoted through social marketing strategy for malaria
control prior to the introduction of long lasting nets (LLN). The paper
breaks from traditional approach that tend to study low uptake of
health interventions in terms of structural practical constraints
– cost, accessibility, everyday priorities – or in terms of
cognition – insufficient knowledge of benefits e.g. ignorance of
public health messages. This paper has shown that, the majority of
people who could afford the prices of ITNs and who knew where to obtain
the insecticides did not necessarily buy them. This suggests that,
although people tend to report costrelated factors as a barrier against
the use of ITNs, there are other critical concerns at work. Without
underestimating the practical factors, our study have recommended to
consider critical examinations of those other concerns that hinder
optimal utilization of ITN for malaria control, and the basis for those
concerns
Comparison of closed-ended, open-ended, and perceived informed consent comprehension measures for a mock HIV prevention trial among women in Tanzania.
Verifying participant comprehension continues to be a difficult ethical and regulatory challenge for clinical research. An increasing number of articles assessing methods to improve comprehension have been published, but they use a wide range of outcome measures including open-ended, closed-ended, and self-perceived measures of comprehension. Systematic comparisons of different measures have rarely been reported. This study evaluated the likely direction of bias observed when using open-ended, closed-ended, and perceived ease of comprehension measures among women administered a mock informed consent process in Mwanza, Tanzania. Participants were randomized to either a closed-ended or an open-ended assessment of comprehension, administered the consent process for a hypothetical HIV prevention trial in Kiswahili, and then administered a comprehension assessment, per their randomization. They were then asked how easy or hard it was to understand each of the informed consent components measured in the comprehension assessment. Women in the closed-ended arm had significantly higher overall comprehension scores than in the open-ended arm. Perceived scores were significantly higher when compared to both open-ended and close-ended scores within arms but were similar between arms. Findings highlight the importance of comprehension assessments in complex clinical trials that go beyond asking participants if they understand or have any questions. They also indicate the need for continued exploration of objective measures of comprehension in international clinical research settings, so that points in need of clarification can be efficiently and effectively identified and addressed. Such measures would reduce burdens on both staff and participants that result from well-intentioned but potentially unnecessary time spent explaining in unwarranted detail things already understood
Sociodemographic characteristics by randomization arm.
<p>Sociodemographic characteristics by randomization arm.</p