Incidental metastatic endocrine tumor diagnosed at laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and bilateral lymph node dissection

The introduction and expansion of laparoscopic and robotic radical retropubic prostatectomy (LRRP and RRRP) for organ-confined prostate cancer have led to an increase in pelvic lymphadenectomy specimens. Extended lymph node dissection (eLND) involves removing nodes over the obturator fossa, external ileac vessels as well as the internal iliac and increases the number of nodes examined. This has the potential to increase incidental nonprostatic nodal pathology identified in prostatectomy specimens. For the first time in the current literature we report the incidental diagnosis of a metastatic small bowel endocrine tumor in a 69-year-old gentleman, made at the time of LRRP and bilateral lymph node dissection. This report suggests that the benefit of an extended lymph node dissection is not only to prostate cancer control and staging, but also to the possibility of diagnosing potentially treatable incidental disease. It is a possibility that both pathologists and urologists alike should be aware of

Feasibility study of a randomized controlled trial comparing docetaxel chemotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy with sequential prostatic biopsies from patients with advanced non–castration-resistant prostate cancer

Background and objective: Sequential tissue biopsies taken during clinical trials of novel systemic anticancer therapies for advanced prostate cancer (PCa) may aid pharmacodynamic evaluation and biomarker discovery. We conducted a single institution phase-II open-labeled randomized study to assess the safety, tolerability, and early efficacy of docetaxel chemotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) vs. ADT alone for patients with advanced non–castration-resistant PCa with sequential prostatic biopsies. Patients and methods: We randomized 30 patients with newly diagnosed high-grade locally advanced or metastatic (cT3–4/N0–1/M0–1) PCa to receive ADT with (n = 15) or without (n = 15) docetaxel. Transrectal ultrasound–guided prostatic biopsies were taken at randomization and ~22 weeks after treatment initiation. Primary end point: biochemical response rate. Secondary end points: time to progression and tumor profiling. Results: Both treatments appear to be well tolerated, and there was no difference in mean nadir prostate-specific antigen and time to prostate-specific antigen relapse between treatment arms (P>0.05). No adverse effects of pre- and post-treatment prostatic biopsies were observed. The study was neither designed nor sufficiently powered to demonstrate statistically significant differences in oncological outcomes or safety profiles between the 2 treatment arms. Conclusions: Despite the lack of statistical power, our study suggests that docetaxel and ADT in combination may be well tolerated with apparently similar short-term efficacy compared with ADT alone for high-grade locally advanced or metastatic non–castration-resistant PCa, Sequential prostatic biopsies may provide tissue for tumor profiling to yield mechanistic or prognostic insights relating to novel systemic anticancer therapies

Use of haemostatic agents and glues during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional survey from the United States and Europe of 1347 cases

OBJECTIVES: Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) is a technically challenging procedure for the management of renal tumours. Major complications of LPN include bleeding and urine leakage. Haemostatic agents (HAs) and/or glues may reduce haemorrhage and urine leakage. We sought to examine the current practice patterns for urologists performing LPN with regard to HA use and its relationship with bleeding and urine leakage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was sent via e-mail to urologists currently performing LPN in centres in the United States and Europe. We queried the indications for HA/glue usage, type of HAs/glues used, and whether concomitant suturing/bolstering was performed. In addition, the total number of LPNs performed, laparoscopic tools used to resect the tumour, tumour size, and tumour position were queried. RESULTS: Surveys suitable for analysis were received from 18 centres (n=1347 cases). HAs and/or glues were used in 1042 (77.4%) cases. Mean tumour size was 2.8cm, with 79% of the tumours being defined as exophytic and 21% deep. The HAs and glues used included gelatin matrix thrombin (FloSeal), fibrin gel (Tisseel), bovine serum albumin (BioGlue), cyanoacrylate glue (Glubran), oxidized regenerated cellulose (Surgicel), or combinations of these. Sixteen centres performed concomitant suturing/bolstering. The overall postoperative bleeding requiring transfusion and urine leakage rates were 2.7% and 1.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The use of HAs and/or glues is routine in most centres performing LPN. The overall haemorrhage and urine leakage rates are low following LPN. More studies are needed to assess the potential role of HAs and/or glues in LP

A Delphi consensus statement for digital surgery.

The use of digital technology is increasing rapidly across surgical specialities, yet there is no consensus for the term 'digital surgery'. This is critical as digital health technologies present technical, governance, and legal challenges which are unique to the surgeon and surgical patient. We aim to define the term digital surgery and the ethical issues surrounding its clinical application, and to identify barriers and research goals for future practice. 38 international experts, across the fields of surgery, AI, industry, law, ethics and policy, participated in a four-round Delphi exercise. Issues were generated by an expert panel and public panel through a scoping questionnaire around key themes identified from the literature and voted upon in two subsequent questionnaire rounds. Consensus was defined if >70% of the panel deemed the statement important and <30% unimportant. A final online meeting was held to discuss consensus statements. The definition of digital surgery as the use of technology for the enhancement of preoperative planning, surgical performance, therapeutic support, or training, to improve outcomes and reduce harm achieved 100% consensus agreement. We highlight key ethical issues concerning data, privacy, confidentiality and public trust, consent, law, litigation and liability, and commercial partnerships within digital surgery and identify barriers and research goals for future practice. Developers and users of digital surgery must not only have an awareness of the ethical issues surrounding digital applications in healthcare, but also the ethical considerations unique to digital surgery. Future research into these issues must involve all digital surgery stakeholders including patients

A Delphi consensus statement for digital surgery.

The use of digital technology is increasing rapidly across surgical specialities, yet there is no consensus for the term 'digital surgery'. This is critical as digital health technologies present technical, governance, and legal challenges which are unique to the surgeon and surgical patient. We aim to define the term digital surgery and the ethical issues surrounding its clinical application, and to identify barriers and research goals for future practice. 38 international experts, across the fields of surgery, AI, industry, law, ethics and policy, participated in a four-round Delphi exercise. Issues were generated by an expert panel and public panel through a scoping questionnaire around key themes identified from the literature and voted upon in two subsequent questionnaire rounds. Consensus was defined if &gt;70% of the panel deemed the statement important and &lt;30% unimportant. A final online meeting was held to discuss consensus statements. The definition of digital surgery as the use of technology for the enhancement of preoperative planning, surgical performance, therapeutic support, or training, to improve outcomes and reduce harm achieved 100% consensus agreement. We highlight key ethical issues concerning data, privacy, confidentiality and public trust, consent, law, litigation and liability, and commercial partnerships within digital surgery and identify barriers and research goals for future practice. Developers and users of digital surgery must not only have an awareness of the ethical issues surrounding digital applications in healthcare, but also the ethical considerations unique to digital surgery. Future research into these issues must involve all digital surgery stakeholders including patients

NIHR Liver/Renal Biomarker Programme Final Report: Evaluating the benefits for patients and the NHS of new and existing biological fluid biomarkers in liver and renal disease

Protein biomarkers are naturally occurring substances that can be measured, often in fluids such as blood or urine, and which provide information about a patient and their illness. Different diseases have different biomarkers. When people become ill, changes in biomarker levels may occur before any clinical symptoms or signs become apparent. Measuring biomarkers in blood or urine is simple, safe and may help the doctor diagnose which disease the patient has, determine how severe it is, help choose the best treatment and help detect if the disease is getting worse or better. Unfortunately, for many diseases there are not enough biomarkers that are of proven usefulness in patient care today. New developments in research mean that many more are now being discovered but there is no quick and reliable way to decide which of the markers are good enough to be useful clinically. While our research proposal focusses on diseases of the liver and kidney, in the future it can also serve as the "blueprint" for similar work in other diseases. It is aimed at developing a structure and methods to assess the clinical usefulness of biomarkers as quickly and efficiently as possible. The research is divided into three parallel workstreams : 1. Identification of the best research methods for monitoring disease or treatment with biomarkers - the lack of understanding this has hampered this field so far. 2. The creation of a sample "banking" system for collecting and storing patient samples and relevant clinical data from large numbers of patients. This will allow the immediate testing of potential new biomarkers now and in the future. The best biomarkers would then go on to full trials to see if patients and the NHS would benefit from their use. 3. A clinical trial at multiple hospitals in the UK of three new biomarkers for liver damage (together called the "Enhanced liver fibrosis" or "ELF", test). We will find out if ELF can give early warning of dangerous liver damage (cirrhosis) and therefore reduce the risk of major complications. This trial may radically alter the way in which patients with liver disease can be looked after clinically. This research programme will benefit patients and the NHS by ensuring that biomarkers in the future can be evaluated and introduced more rapidly, improving clinical management for each individual patient and leading to better use of NHS resources