Unilateral Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Prostate Cancer Patients Diagnosed in the Era of Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy: A Study That Challenges the Dogma

PURPOSE: Bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection at the time of radical prostatectomy is the current standard of care if pelvic lymph node dissection is indicated; often, however, pelvic lymph node dissection is performed in pN0 disease. With the more accurate staging achieved with magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsies for prostate cancer diagnosis, the indication for bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection may be revised. We aimed to assess the feasibility of unilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection in the era of modern prostate cancer imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed a multi-institutional data set of men with cN0 disease diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy who underwent prostatectomy and bilateral extended pelvic lymph node dissection. The outcome of the study was lymph node invasion contralateral to the prostatic lobe with worse disease features, ie, dominant lobe. Logistic regression to predict lymph node invasion contralateral to the dominant lobe was generated and internally validated. RESULTS: Overall, data from 2,253 patients were considered. Lymph node invasion was documented in 302 (13%) patients; 83 (4%) patients had lymph node invasion contralateral to the dominant prostatic lobe. A model including prostate-specific antigen, maximum diameter of the index lesion, seminal vesicle invasion on magnetic resonance imaging, International Society of Urological Pathology grade in the nondominant side, and percentage of positive cores in the nondominant side achieved an area under the curve of 84% after internal validation. With a cutoff of contralateral lymph node invasion of 1%, 602 (27%) contralateral pelvic lymph node dissections would be omitted with only 1 (1.2%) lymph node invasion missed. CONCLUSIONS: Pelvic lymph node dissection could be omitted contralateral to the prostate lobe with worse disease features in selected patients. We propose a model that can help avoid contralateral pelvic lymph node dissection in almost one-third of cases

Association between age and efficacy of combination systemic therapies in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Combination systemic therapies have become the standard for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the effect of age on oncologic outcomes remains unknown. Our aim was to perform a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis (NMA) on the effect of chronological age on overall survival (OS) in patients treated with combination therapies for mHSPC. METHODS: We searched the PubMed®, Web of ScienceTM, and Scopus® databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that analyzed the efficacy of combination systemic therapies using ADT plus docetaxel and/or androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) in patients with mHSPC. We included studies, which provided separate hazard ratios (HRs) for younger vs. older patients. The selected age cut-off was 70 years (±5 years). Our outcome of interest was OS. RESULTS: We included nine RCTs with a total of 9183 patients. Younger and older men constituted 51% and 49% of included patients, respectively. Docetaxel plus ADT significantly improved OS among both older (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99, p = 0.04) and younger patients (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90, p < 0.001) with no differences according to age. ARSI plus ADT improved OS in older (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.80, p < 0.001) and younger (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.51-0.66, p < 0.001) patients; younger patients did benefit more (p = 0.02). On NMA treatment ranking, triplet therapy showed the highest probability of OS benefit irrespective of age group; in older patients, the benefit of triplet therapy compared to doublet was less expressed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mHSPC benefit from combination systemic therapies irrespective of age; the effect is, however, more evident in younger patients. Chronological age alone seems not to be a selection criteria for the administration of combination systemic therapies

Association between age and efficacy of combination systemic therapies in patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer : a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Combination systemic therapies have become the standard for metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). However, the effect of age on oncologic outcomes remains unknown. Our aim was to perform a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis (NMA) on the effect of chronological age on overall survival (OS) in patients treated with combination therapies for mHSPC. METHODS: We searched the PubMed®, Web of ScienceTM, and Scopus® databases to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that analyzed the efficacy of combination systemic therapies using ADT plus docetaxel and/or androgen receptor signaling inhibitor (ARSI) in patients with mHSPC. We included studies, which provided separate hazard ratios (HRs) for younger vs. older patients. The selected age cut-off was 70 years (±5 years). Our outcome of interest was OS. RESULTS: We included nine RCTs with a total of 9183 patients. Younger and older men constituted 51% and 49% of included patients, respectively. Docetaxel plus ADT significantly improved OS among both older (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.63-0.99, p = 0.04) and younger patients (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90, p < 0.001) with no differences according to age. ARSI plus ADT improved OS in older (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.64-0.80, p < 0.001) and younger (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.51-0.66, p < 0.001) patients; younger patients did benefit more (p = 0.02). On NMA treatment ranking, triplet therapy showed the highest probability of OS benefit irrespective of age group; in older patients, the benefit of triplet therapy compared to doublet was less expressed. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with mHSPC benefit from combination systemic therapies irrespective of age; the effect is, however, more evident in younger patients. Chronological age alone seems not to be a selection criteria for the administration of combination systemic therapies

Establishing a global quality of care benchmark report

Background: the Movember funded TrueNTH Global Registry (TNGR) aims to improve care by collecting and analysing a consistent dataset to identify variation in disease management, benchmark care delivery in accordance with best practice guidelines and provide this information to those in a position to enact change. We discuss considerations of designing and implementing a quality of care report for TNGR. Methods: eleven working group sessions were held prior to and as reports were being built with representation from clinicians, data managers and investigators contributing to TNGR. The aim of the meetings was to understand current data display approaches, share literature review findings and ideas for innovative approaches. Preferred displays were evaluated with two surveys (survey 1: 5 clinicians and 5 non-clinicians, 83% response rate; survey 2: 17 clinicians and 18 non-clinicians, 93% response rate). Results: consensus on dashboard design and three data-display preferences were achieved. The dashboard comprised two performance summary charts; one summarising site’s relative quality indicator (QI) performance and another to summarise data quality. Binary outcome QIs were presented as funnel plots. Patient-reported outcome measures of function score and the extent to which men were bothered by their symptoms were presented in bubble plots. Time series graphs were seen as providing important information to supplement funnel and bubble plots. R Markdown was selected as the software program principally because of its excellent analytic and graph display capacity, open source licensing model and the large global community sharing program code enhancements. Conclusions: international collaboration in creating and maintaining clinical quality registries has allowed benchmarking of process and outcome measures on a large scale. A registry report system was developed with stakeholder engagement to produce dynamic reports that provide user-specific feedback to 132 participating sites across 13 countries.</p