Clinical response correlates with 4-week postinjection ustekinumab concentrations in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis

Background: Cost‐effective use of biologicals is important. As drug concentrations have been linked to clinical outcomes, monitoring drug concentrations is a valuable tool to guide clinical decision‐making. A concentration–response relationship for ustekinumab at trough is uncertain owing to the contradictory results reported. Objectives: To investigate the relationship between 4‐week postinjection ustekinumab concentrations and clinical response in patients with psoriasis. Methods: Forty‐nine patients with moderate‐to‐severe psoriasis treated with 45 mg or 90 mg ustekinumab every 12 weeks for ≥ 16 weeks were included. Ustekinumab serum concentrations and anti‐ustekinumab antibodies were measured at week 4 after injection and disease severity was assessed by Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Results: At week 4 after injection, a significantly negative correlation was observed between ustekinumab concentrations and absolute PASI score up to 5·9 μg mL−1 (ρ = –0·357, P = 0·032). Ustekinumab concentrations were higher in optimal responders (PASI ≤ 2) than in suboptimal responders (PASI > 2) (4·0 vs 2·8 μg mL−1, P = 0·036). The ustekinumab concentration threshold associated with optimal response was determined to be 3·6 μg mL−1 (area under the curve 0·71, sensitivity 86%, specificity 63%). Only one patient (2%) had anti‐ustekinumab antibodies. Psoriatic arthritis was identified as an independent predictor of higher PASI scores and higher ustekinumab concentrations (P = 0·003 and P = 0·048, respectively). Conclusions: A concentration–response relationship at week 4 after injection was observed for patients with psoriasis treated with ustekinumab. Monitoring 4‐week postinjection ustekinumab concentrations could timely identify underexposed patients who might benefit from treatment optimization

Dermatologists on the medical need for therapeutic drug monitoring of biologics in psoriasis : results of a structured survey

Background Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) may lead to more rational use of biologics. Still, TDM is largely underexplored in psoriasis. Little is known about the dosing behavior of biologics by dermatologists, and their attitude toward TDM. Objective Exploration of the awareness and need for the concept of TDM in psoriasis amongst (inter)national dermatologists. Method A survey was distributed at the Belgian Dermatology Days 2019 and Skin Inflammation & Psoriasis International Network (SPIN) Congress 2019. Next, an online survey version was launched amongst the SPIN Scientific Committee members. We collected physician's characteristics, prescription behavior of biologics, data regarding clinical response to biologics and attitude toward TDM. Results A total of 107 surveys were included for analysis. Most dermatologists were Belgium-based (54.2%), others from European (23.4%) or non-European countries (19.6%). Seventy percent performed either dose increase (64.8%), time interval shortening (74.6%), dose lowering (16.9%) or time interval extension (33.8%). The majority who performed dose adaptations acknowledged the need for TDM. Conclusion This study showed most dermatologists perform dose adaptations empirically. The need for TDM was indicated by the majority, implying the need for effective communication regarding availability, utility and implementation of TDM assays in daily dermatology practice

Real-life effectiveness and short-term (16-week) tolerance of guselkumab for psoriasis: A Belgian retrospective multicentre study

Dear Editor, We read with great interest the multicenter and retrospective study of Fougerosse et al1 that investigated real-life effectiveness and tolerance of guselkumab at week 16 in the treatment of cutaneous psoriasis. In the same manner, we conducted the first multicenter study in Belgium aiming to investigate real-life effectiveness and tolerance of guselkumab at week 16 in the treatment of cutaneous psoriasis. [...

Therapeutic drug monitoring in dermatology : the way towards dose optimization of secukinumab in chronic plaque psoriasis

Background Despite the favourable efficacy profile of secukinumab, clinicians encounter varying clinical responses among patients potentially associated with under- and overdosing. As biologics are expensive, their rational use is crucial and evident. Therapeutic drug monitoring could guide clinicians in making decisions about treatment modifications. Aim In this multicentre, prospective study, we aimed to develop and validate a secukinumab immunoassay and searched for the therapeutic window in patients with psoriasis. Methods We determined secukinumab concentrations at trough in sera from 78 patients with psoriasis at multiple timepoints (Weeks 12, 24, 36, 48 and 52; after Week 52, measurements could be taken at an additional three timepoints) during maintenance phase, using an in-house secukinumab immunoassay consisting of a combination of MA-SEC66A2 as capture antibody and MA-SEC67A9, conjugated to horseradish peroxidase, as detecting antibody. At each hospital visit, disease severity was assessed using the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Results After quantification, 121 serum samples were included for dose-response analysis. Based on a linear mixed-effects model, secukinumab trough concentrations were found to decrease with increasing body mass index (BMI). Based on receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, we concluded that the minimal effective secukinumab threshold was 39.1 mg/L in steady state, and that this was associated with a 92.7% probability of having an optimal clinical response (PASI = 90%). Conclusions Monitoring and targeting a secukinumab trough concentration of 39.1 mg/L may be a viable treatment option in suboptimal responders. In patients with higher BMI, weight-based dosing may be needed in order to prevent underdosing

Promising tools to facilitate the implementation of TDM of biologics in clinical practice

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of biologics-encompassing the measurement of (trough) concentrations and anti-drug antibodies-is emerging as a valuable tool for clinical decision making. While this strategy needs further validation, attention on its implementation into the clinic is warranted. Rapid testing and easy sampling are key to its implementation. Here, we aimed to evaluate the feasibility and volunteers' perception of home microsampling for quantification of adalimumab (ADM) concentrations in psoriasis patients. In addition, we compared lateral flow testing (LFT) with enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Patients participating in the SUPRA-A study (clinicaltrials.gov NCT04028713) were asked to participate in a substudy where volumetric absorptive microsampling (VAMS) was performed at home. At three time points, whole blood and corresponding serum samples were collected for ADM measurement using an in-house ELISA. In addition, the patients' perspective on microsampling was evaluated via a questionnaire. LFT-obtained ADM concentrations agreed very well with ELISA results (Pearson's correlation = 0.95 and R-2 = 0.89). ADM concentrations determined in both capillary (via finger prick) and corresponding venous blood VAMS samples correlated strongly with serum concentrations (Pearson's correlation = 0.87). Our preliminary data (n = 7) on rapid testing and home-based microsampling are considered promising with regard to TDM implementation for adalimumab, warranting further research

Development and validation of immunoassays for monitoring of guselkumab and anti-guselkumab antibodies in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis

Therapeutic drug monitoring, which is the measurement of drug concentrations in the blood, is a useful tool to guide clinical decision-making and treatment adjustments, on the condition that drug concentrations are correlated with treatment response. For guselkumab, an anti-IL-23 monoclonal antibody for the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis, such a concentration-response relationship could not yet be determined as no commercial assays for the quantification of this drug or antibodies against this drug are available. Therefore, the aim of this study was to develop and validate immunoassays for the quantification of guselkumab and anti-guselkumab antibodies according to the guidelines of the European Medicines Agency (EMA). A diverse panel of 20 highly specific anti-guselkumab monoclonal antibodies (MA-GUS) was generated of which eight revealed a neutralizing capacity of ≥65 %. At least seven different antibody clusters were identified based on their epitope binning profile. Using MA-GUS9F6 as the capture antibody and MA-GUS12G12 as the detection antibody, an ELISA was developed with a dose-response curve ranging from 0.08 to 5 ng/mL. The assay was specific, selective and could accurately and precisely quantify guselkumab concentrations in spiked healthy control serum and serum from guselkumab-treated psoriasis patients with a cut-off for quantification of 0.014 μg/mL. The presence of IL-23 in physiological concentrations or of non-neutralizing antibodies did not impact the quantification of guselkumab, while the presence of neutralizing antibodies did. Using MA-GUS12A9 as a calibrator, two anti-guselkumab antibody assays were developed to detect anti-guselkumab antibodies, which differ in the threshold for detection and quantification and the tolerance to the presence of guselkumab. Together, these validated immunoassays are essential to establish a concentration-response relationship and will allow the future implementation of therapeutic drug monitoring in moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients receiving guselkumab treatment.status: publishe