27 research outputs found

    Effects of diffuser airflow minima on occupant comfort, air mixing, and building energy use (RP-1515)

    Get PDF
    There is great energy-saving potential in reducing variable air volume (VAV) box minimum airflow setpoints to about 10% of maximum.  Typical savings are on the order of 10-30% of total HVAC energy, remarkable for an inexpensive controls setpoint change that properly maintains outside air ventilation. However, there has long been concern whether comfort and room air mixing are maintained under low flows through diffusers, and this concern has prompted VAV minima to be typically set at 20-50% of maximum.RP 1515 evaluated occupants’ thermal comfort and air quality satisfaction in operating buildings under both conventional and reduced minimum VAV flow setpoints, and measured the air diffusion performance index and air change effectiveness for typical diffuser types in the laboratory.  The hypotheses were that lowered flow operation would not significantly reduce comfort or air quality, and that HVAC energy savings would be substantial. The hypotheses were almost entirely confirmed for both warm and cool seasons.  But beyond this, the reduction of excess airflow during low-load periods caused occupants’ cold discomfort in the warm season to be halved, a surprising improvement.  It appears that today’s widespread overcooling of buildings can be corrected without risk of discomfort by lowering conventional VAV minimum flow setpoints

    Time-averaged ventilation for optimized control of variable-air-volume systems

    Full text link
    Typical Variable Air Volume (VAV) terminals spend the majority of time at their minimum airflow setpoints. These are often higher than the minimum ventilation requirements defined by code, resulting in excess energy use and a risk of over-cooling the spaces. We developed and tested a Time-Averaged Ventilation (TAV) control strategy in an institutional building on the UC Berkeley campus to address this issue. Whenever a zone does not require cooling, TAV alternates the VAV damper between partially open and fully closed so that the average airflow matches a predefined ventilation setpoint. Compared to the existing, base case scenario using single-max VAV logic, this strategy reduced the mean zone airflow fraction from 0.44 to 0.27 during the intervention period. The corresponding reductions in average heating, cooling, and fan power were 41%, 23%, and 15% respectively. In addition to being programmed directly in a native control system, TAV may be applied via sMAP as a low-cost retrofit strategy in any building that has a BACnet network and direct digital control (DDC) to each VAV terminal

    Effect of a heated and cooled office chair on thermal comfort

    No full text
    A heated/cooled chair was evaluated for its effect on thermal sensation and comfort. Thirty college students participated in 150 1.75-h tests. Two heated/cooled chairs were placed in an environmental chamber resembling an office environment. The chamber temperatures were set at 16°C, 18°C, 25°C, and 29°C (60.8°F, 64.4°F, 77°F, 84.2°F). During the tests, subjects had full control of the chair surface temperature through a knob located on the desk. An additional 64 tests with 16 subjects were conducted at the same 4 temperatures but with regular mesh or cushion chairs in order to provide reference results for comparison. Subjective responses about thermal sensation, comfort, and temperature satisfaction were obtained at 20-min intervals and eight times before, during, and after a break period. The chair's energy consumption was monitored continuously. The results show that the heated/cooled chair strongly influences the subjects thermal sensation and comfort, providing thermal comfort under all tested conditions, both warm and cool. The average power draw is 27 W at 16°C (60.8°F), and 45.5 W at 29°C (84.2°F) ambient conditions. Copyright © 2013 Crown copyright
    corecore