7 research outputs found

    Where Is the Heart after Left-Sided Pneumonectomy?

    Get PDF

    Observer Variation of 2-Deoxy-2-[F-18]fluoro-d-Glucose-Positron Emission Tomography in Mediastinal Staging of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer as a Function of Experience, and its Potential Clinical Impact

    Get PDF
    Purpose: To test the extent of variation among nuclear medicine physicians with respect to staging non-small cell lung cancer with positron emission tomography (PET). Procedures: Two groups of nuclear medicine physicians with different levels of PET experience reviewed 30 PET scans. They were requested to identify and localize suspicious mediastinal lymph nodes (MLN) using standardized algorithms. Results were compared between the two groups, between individuals, and with expert reading. Results: Overall we found good interobserver agreement (kappa 0.65). Experience with PET translated into a better ability to localize MLN stations (68 % vs. 51%, respectively), and experienced readers appeared to be more familiar with translating PET readings into clinically useful statements. Conclusions: Although our results suggest that clinical experience with PET increases observers _ ability to read and interpret results from PET adequately, there is room for improvement. Experience with PET does not necessarily improve the accuracy of image interpretation

    Cardiac function and position more than 5 years after pneumonectomy

    No full text
    BACKGROUND: Pneumonectomy not only reduces the pulmonary vascular bed but also changes the position of the heart and large vessels, which may affect the function of the heart. We investigated long-term effects of pneumonectomy on right ventricular (RV) and left ventricular (LV) function and whether this function is influenced by the side of pneumonectomy or the migration of the heart to its new position. METHODS: In 15 patients who underwent pneumonectomy and survived for more than 5 years, we evaluated by dynamic magnetic resonance imaging the function of the RV and LV and the position of the heart within the thorax. RESULTS: Long-term effect of pneumonectomy on the position of the heart is characterized by a lateral shift after right-sided pneumonectomy and rotation of the heart after left-sided pneumonectomy. Postoperatively, heart rate was high (p = 0.006) and stroke volume was low (p = 0.001), compared with the reference values, indicating impaired cardiac function. Patients after right-sided pneumonectomy had an abnormal low RV end-diastolic volume of 99 +/- 29 mL together with a normal LV function. No signs of RV hypertrophy were found. In left-sided pneumonectomy patients, RV volumes were normal whereas LV ejection fraction was abnormally low. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term effects of pneumonectomy on the position of the heart are characterized by a lateral shift in patients after right-sided pneumonectomy and rotation of the heart in patients after left-sided pneumonectomy. Overall, cardiac function in long-term survivors after pneumonectomy is compromised, and might be explained by the altered position of the heart

    Variation Between Multidisciplinary Tumor Boards in Clinical Staging and Treatment Recommendations for Patients With Locally Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

    Get PDF
    Background: Accurate diagnosis and staging are crucial to ensure uniform allocation to the optimal treatment methods for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, but may differ among multidisciplinary tumor boards (MDTs). Discordance between clinical and pathologic TNM stage is particularly important for patients with locally advanced NSCLC (stage IIIA) because it may influence their chance of allocation to curative-intent treatment. We therefore aimed to study agreement on staging and treatment to gain insight into MDT decision-making. Research Question: What is the level of agreement on clinical staging and treatment recommendations among MDTs in stage IIIA NSCLC patients? Study Design and Methods: Eleven MDTs each evaluated the same 10 pathologic stage IIIA NSCLC patients in their weekly meeting (n = 110). Patients were selected purposively for their challenging nature. All MDTs received exactly the same clinical information and images per patient. We tested agreement in cT stage, cN stage, cM stage (TNM 8th edition), and treatment proposal among MDTs using Randolph's free-marginal multirater kappa. Results: Considerable variation among the MDTs was seen in T staging (κ, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.34-0.75]), N staging (κ, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.35-0.83]), overall TNM staging (κ, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.35-0.72]), and treatment recommendations (κ, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.32-0.56]). Most variation in T stage was seen in patients with suspicion of invasion of surrounding structures, which influenced such treatment recommendations as induction therapy and type. For N stage, distinction between N1 and N2 disease was an important source of discordance among MDTs. Variation occurred between 2 patients even regarding M stage. A wide range of additional diagnostics was proposed by the MDTs. Interpretation: This study demonstrated high variation in staging and treatment of patients with stage IIIA NSCLC among MDTs in different hospitals. Although some variation may be unavoidable in these challenging patients, we should strive for more uniformity
    corecore