18 research outputs found

    Perception of Fourier and non- Fourier motion by larval zebrafish

    Get PDF
    articles Zebrafish larvae innately begin responding to moving stimuli shortly after hatching. In their optomotor response, which is elicited by large moving stimuli presented from below or the side 1,2 , larvae swim in the direction of perceived motion. The distance they travel in a given time indicates the effectiveness of the stimulus. By observing the response of many larvae to computer-animated displays, we could determine which attributes of a moving stimulus the zebrafish visual system detects. If luminance-defined features drift smoothly or jump in space, they can produce strong sensations of motion. A number of proposed models explain how motion information can be extracted. In a simple model, a point-to-point comparison is made between the luminance pattern and a spatially displaced copy of the pattern that was seen a short time before 3 . The displacement that gives the best fit tells the brain the direction and speed of movement. A more complex strategy is to look at the Fourier motion energy in the visual scene Although there is evidence that humans can use both feature matching and motion energy to detect movement 7 , they may also sense motion when presented with stimuli in which only secondorder features such as contrast, texture or flicker are moving Here we find that the fish larvae detect moving features of visu- A moving grating elicits innate optomotor behavior in zebrafish larvae; they swim in the direction of perceived motion. We took advantage of this behavior, using computer-animated displays, to determine what attributes of motion are extracted by the fish visual system. As in humans, first-order (luminance-defined or Fourier) signals dominated motion perception in fish; edges or other features had little or no effect when presented with these signals. Humans can see complex movements that lack first-order cues, an ability that is usually ascribed to higher-level processing in the visual cortex. Here we show that second-order (non-Fourier) motion displays induced optomotor behavior in zebrafish larvae, which do not have a cortex. We suggest that second-order motion is extracted early in the lower vertebrate visual pathway. al stimuli in a way that is qualitatively similar to humans: both firstorder and second-order cues drive their behavioral response. Our demonstration of second-order motion detection in fish challenges the idea that higher-level, cortical mechanisms are necessary to explain this capacity of the visual system. RESULTS Optomotor responses to Fourier motion The assay used to measure optomotor responses is similar to the one described previously 2 (Methods). Movies showing drifting gratings evoke strong optomotor responses in almost all fish in a clutch. Fish do not respond to a moving grating with a stripe width narrower than approximately 9°, which is slightly less than the predicted resolution limit of the larval cone mosaic, 6°at this age In the following experiments, responses were normalized to the effect of a designated strong stimulus, a 100% contrast square wave subtending 100°of visual angle per cycle and moving at 1 Hz for 30 seconds Although the fish seemed to follow a motion signal in the movies, it was possible that they were tracking features such as light or dark regions or edges that were being displaced. We did an experiment to show that the optomotor response is truly a response to motion. A motion display was shown of a sine wave grating tha

    Forward Genetic Analysis of Visual Behavior in Zebrafish

    Get PDF
    The visual system converts the distribution and wavelengths of photons entering the eye into patterns of neuronal activity, which then drive motor and endocrine behavioral responses. The gene products important for visual processing by a living and behaving vertebrate animal have not been identified in an unbiased fashion. Likewise, the genes that affect development of the nervous system to shape visual function later in life are largely unknown. Here we have set out to close this gap in our understanding by using a forward genetic approach in zebrafish. Moving stimuli evoke two innate reflexes in zebrafish larvae, the optomotor and the optokinetic response, providing two rapid and quantitative tests to assess visual function in wild-type (WT) and mutant animals. These behavioral assays were used in a high-throughput screen, encompassing over half a million fish. In almost 2,000 F2 families mutagenized with ethylnitrosourea, we discovered 53 recessive mutations in 41 genes. These new mutations have generated a broad spectrum of phenotypes, which vary in specificity and severity, but can be placed into only a handful of classes. Developmental phenotypes include complete absence or abnormal morphogenesis of photoreceptors, and deficits in ganglion cell differentiation or axon targeting. Other mutations evidently leave neuronal circuits intact, but disrupt phototransduction, light adaptation, or behavior-specific responses. Almost all of the mutants are morphologically indistinguishable from WT, and many survive to adulthood. Genetic linkage mapping and initial molecular analyses show that our approach was effective in identifying genes with functions specific to the visual system. This collection of zebrafish behavioral mutants provides a novel resource for the study of normal vision and its genetic disorders

    The <i>darl</i> Mutant Shows Retinotectal Mapping Deficits

    No full text
    <p>(A and B) The nasal-dorsal quadrant of the retina was labeled with DiO (green), and the temporal-ventral quadrant was labeled with DiD (magenta). In <i>darl<sup>s327</sup>,</i> the ventral branch of the optic tract is missing (arrow). Scale bar is 100 μm.</p> <p>(C and D) Dorsal view of the tectum in the same larvae as in A and B. The ventral half of the <i>darl<sup>s327</sup></i> tectum is not innervated by the dorsal-nasal RGC axons. Anterior is to the left and ventral is to the bottom. Tectal neuropil is demarcated by the dotted line, based on DAPI counterstaining (blue). Scale bar is 50 μm.</p

    Example of an OKR Mutant with Normal Morphology

    No full text
    <p>(A) WT sibling and <i>zat<sup>s125</sup></i> mutants are indistinguishable in their appearance (shown here at 6 dpf).</p> <p>(B) The mutant showed no OKR, but saccadic eye movements, which were not correlated to the motion stimulus. The <i>zat</i> gene encodes cone-specific Gc3.</p

    Example of a Mutant with Abnormal Morphology of Cone Photoreceptors

    No full text
    <p>Photoreceptors in a retinal section stained with DAPI (A and B) and a marker for double cones, zpr1 (C and D) at 7 dpf in WT larva (A, C, and E) and <i>yoi<sup>s121</sup></i> mutant retina (B, D, and F). Merged images of DAPI (in green) and zpr1 (in magenta) are also shown (E and F). Both zpr1-positive and zpr1-negative cone photoreceptors in the mutant are “stumpy” when compared to those in the control retina (arrows). B, bipolar cells; C, cone photoreceptor cells; H, horizontal cells; ONL, outer nuclear layer; OPL, outer plexiform layer. Scale bar is 10 μm.</p
    corecore