7 research outputs found

    РЕЗУЛЬВАВЫ Π”ΠžΠ‘ΠΠ’Π›Π•ΠΠ˜Π― ΠŸΠΠΠ˜Π’Π£ΠœΠ£ΠœΠΠ‘Π К ΠšΠžΠΠ’Π•Π Π‘Π˜ΠžΠΠΠžΠ™ Π’Π•Π ΠΠŸΠ˜Π˜ ΠšΠžΠ›ΠžΠ Π•ΠšΠ’ΠΠ›Π¬ΠΠžΠ“Πž РАКА Π‘ ΠœΠ•Π’ΠΠ‘Π’ΠΠ—ΠΠœΠ˜ Π’ ΠŸΠ•Π§Π•ΠΠ¬

    Get PDF
    Panitumumab has been shown to increase progression free and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Our purpose was to evaluate whether panitumumab is effective and safe in patients with potentially resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).Methods. Consecutive analysis of data from 11 patients (KRAS wild) receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and panitumumab as converse preoperative treatment for potentially resectable CRLM. At the moment of presentation R0-liver resection was not possible due to technical reasons (small remnant volume, large liver vessels involvement etc.). We studied objective response rate, surgical characteristics, skin toxicity profile, and perioperative course. Also expression of EGFR-ligands (transforming growth factor-Ξ± and amphiregulin) and Β Β expression of E-cadherin were studied.Results. After median 6 courses of treatment, metastatic liver tumors were reduced considerably (PR) in 8 pts (73 %). Radical liver resection (R0) with 3 median number of removed segments was done in 6 (55 %) patients. Two pts underwent successfully the two-stage surgery (1 – portal vein embolization and 1 – portal vein ligation with partial left resection). Two patients progressed on chemotherapy (18 %). There was no correlation between skin toxicity and response. Mean blood loss was 250 ml. Preoperative administration of panitumumab was associated with higher risk of postoperative infection complication (57.1 %).Conclusions. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report about using panitumumab as conversion therapy before liver resection. The panitumumab and oxaliplatine-based regimen may increase the resection rate of liver metastases and influence on adhesive and proliferative activity of cancer cells. It is necessary to focus on postoperative infection complications.Π”ΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Π½ΠΎ, Ρ‡Ρ‚ΠΎ ΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΡƒΠΌΡƒΠΌΠ°Π± ΡƒΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅Ρ‚ Π²Ρ‹ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π±Π΅Π· прогрСссирования ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±Ρ‰ΡƒΡŽ Π²Ρ‹ΠΆΠΈΠ²Π°Π΅ΠΌΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ Ρƒ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с мСтастазами ΠΊΠΎΠ»ΠΎΡ€Π΅ΠΊΡ‚Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ€Π°ΠΊΠ° (КРР) Π² ΠΏΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΡŒ.ЦСлью нашСго исслСдования стала ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° бСзопасности ΠΈ эффСктивности добавлСния ΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΡƒΠΌΡƒΠΌΠ°Π±Π° ΠΊ Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΡŽ ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² с ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅Π·Π΅ΠΊΡ‚Π°Π±Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹ΠΌΠΈ мСтастазами.ΠœΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. Π’ ΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎΡ€Ρ‚Π½ΠΎΠ΅ проспСктивноС исслСдованиС Π±Ρ‹Π»ΠΈ Π²ΠΊΠ»ΡŽΡ‡Π΅Π½Ρ‹ 11 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² (Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠΈΠΉ Ρ‚ΠΈΠΏ KRAS) с мСтастазами КРР Π² ΠΏΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΡŒ, расцСнСнныС исходно ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ Β«ΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Π½Ρ†ΠΈΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅Π·Π΅ΠΊΡ‚Π°Π±Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½Ρ‹Π΅Β» ΠΈ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡ΠΈΠ²ΡˆΠΈΠ΅ Π² качСствС конвСрсионной ΠΏΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΡƒΠΌΡƒΠΌΠ°Π± Π² сочСтании с Ρ…ΠΈΠΌΠΈΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ Π½Π° основС оксалиплатина Π² ΠΎΡ‚Π΄Π΅Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠΈ Ρ…ΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡ€Π³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈ, ΠΏΠΎΠ΄ΠΆΠ΅Π»ΡƒΠ΄ΠΎΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Π΅Π·Ρ‹ ΠΈ ΠΆΠ΅Π»Ρ‡Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΏΡƒΡ‚Π΅ΠΉ Π€Π“Π‘Π£ «РНЦΠ₯ ΠΈΠΌ. Π°ΠΊΠ°Π΄. Π‘.Π’. ΠŸΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠ²ΡΠΊΠΎΠ³ΠΎΒ» РАМН. К исслСдуСмым ΠΏΠ°Ρ€Π°ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΌ ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΡΠΈΠ»ΠΈΡΡŒ частота ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½Ρ‚ ΠΎΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ ΠΎΡ‚Π²Π΅Ρ‚Π° ΠΏΠΎ критСриям RECIST 1.1, ΠΎΡ†Π΅Π½ΠΊΠ° частоты выполнСния Ρ€Π΅Π·Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ Π² объСмС R0, ΠΈΠ½Ρ‚Ρ€Π°ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΈ послСопСрационныС ΠΏΠΎΠΊΠ°Π·Π°Ρ‚Π΅Π»ΠΈ, Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΈΠ΅ ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ кровопотСря Π²ΠΎ врСмя ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ»ΠΆΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ, Π΄Π»ΠΈΡ‚Π΅Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ прСбывания Π² стационарС, ослоТнСния, 30-днСвная ΠΈ 90-днСвная Π»Π΅Ρ‚Π°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΡΡ‚ΡŒ. Π’Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ‡Π°Π»Π°ΡΡŒ экспрСссия Π»ΠΈΠ³Π°Π½Π΄ΠΎΠ² Ρ€Π΅Ρ†Π΅ΠΏΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π° ΡΠΏΠΈΠ΄Π΅Ρ€ΠΌΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΠΎΠ³ΠΎ Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π° роста (EGFR) – Ρ‚Ρ€Π°Π½ΡΡ„ΠΎΡ€ΠΌΠΈΡ€ΡƒΡŽΡ‰Π΅Π³ΠΎ Ρ„Π°ΠΊΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Π° роста ΠΈ Π°ΠΌΡ„ΠΈΡ€Π΅Π³ΡƒΠ»ΠΈΠ½Π°, Π° Ρ‚Π°ΠΊΠΆΠ΅ E-ΠΊΠ°Π΄Π³Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ½Π°.Π Π΅Π·ΡƒΠ»ΡŒΡ‚Π°Ρ‚Ρ‹. ПослС Π² срСднСм 6 курсов лСчСния частичный ΠΎΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹ΠΉ ΠΎΡ‚Π²Π΅Ρ‚ Π±Ρ‹Π» зарСгистрирован Π² 73 % случаСв. Π Π°Π΄ΠΈΠΊΠ°Π»ΡŒΠ½ΡƒΡŽ Ρ€Π΅Π·Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΡŽ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈ с ΡƒΠ΄Π°Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ΠΌ Π² срСднСм 3 сСгмСнтов ΡƒΠ΄Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡŒ Π²Ρ‹ΠΏΠΎΠ»Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ Π² ΠΎΠ΄ΠΈΠ½ этап Ρƒ 6 (55 %) ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ². Π”Π²Π° ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚Π° ΡƒΡΠΏΠ΅ΡˆΠ½ΠΎ Π·Π°Π²Π΅Ρ€ΡˆΠΈΠ»ΠΈ двухэтапноС Π»Π΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ (1 – эмболизация Π²ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π΅Π½Ρ‹ ΠΈ 1 – пСрСвязка ΠΏΡ€Π°Π²ΠΎΠΉ Π²ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΡ‚Π½ΠΎΠΉ Π²Π΅Π½Ρ‹ с сСгмСнтарной лСвостороннСй Ρ€Π΅Π·Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠ΅ΠΉ). Π£ 2 ΠΏΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠ΅Π½Ρ‚ΠΎΠ² Π±Ρ‹Π»Π° зафиксирована прогрСссия Π½Π° Ρ„ΠΎΠ½Π΅ лСчСния. ΠšΠΎΡ€Ρ€Π΅Π»ΡΡ†ΠΈΡ ΠΌΠ΅ΠΆΠ΄Ρƒ ΡΡ‚Π΅ΠΏΠ΅Π½ΡŒΡŽ выраТСнности ΠΊΠΎΠΆΠ½ΠΎΠΉ токсичности ΠΈ ΠΎΠ±ΡŠΠ΅ΠΊΡ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ ΠΎΡ‚Π²Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΌ отсутствовала. МСдиана ΠΊΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΏΠΎΡ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈ составила 250 ΠΌΠ». ΠŸΡ€Π΅Π΄ΠΎΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Π°Ρ тСрапия ΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΡƒΠΌΡƒΠΌΠ°Π±ΠΎΠΌ ΡΠΎΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΆΠ΄Π°Π»Π°ΡΡŒ ΠΏΠΎΠ²Ρ‹ΡˆΠ΅Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ риском послСопСрационных ΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ослоТнСний (57,1 %).Π’Ρ‹Π²ΠΎΠ΄Ρ‹. По нашим Π΄Π°Π½Π½Ρ‹ΠΌ, это ΠΏΠ΅Ρ€Π²ΠΎΠ΅ исслСдованиС, Π² ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€ΠΎΠΌ ΠΈΠ·ΡƒΡ‡Π°Π»ΠΎΡΡŒ Π΄ΠΎΠ±Π°Π²Π»Π΅Π½ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΡƒΠΌΡƒΠΌΠ°Π±Π° ΠΊ конвСрсионной Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€Π°ΠΏΠΈΠΈ мСтастатичСского КРР Π΄ΠΎ Ρ€Π΅Π·Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈ. Π Π΅ΠΆΠΈΠΌ лСчСния с использованиСм ΠΏΠ°Π½ΠΈΡ‚ΡƒΠΌΡƒΠΌΠ°Π±Π° ΠΈ оксалиплатина ΠΌΠΎΠΆΠ΅Ρ‚ ΡƒΠ²Π΅Π»ΠΈΡ‡ΠΈΡ‚ΡŒ частоту ΡƒΡΠΏΠ΅ΡˆΠ½Ρ‹Ρ… Ρ€Π΅Π·Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΉ ΠΏΠ΅Ρ‡Π΅Π½ΠΈ ΠΈ Π²Π»ΠΈΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π½Π° Π°Π΄Π³Π΅Π·ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΎΠ»ΠΈΡ„Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ‚ΠΈΠ²Π½Ρ‹Π΅ свойства ΠΎΠΏΡƒΡ…ΠΎΠ»Π΅Π²Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΊΠ»Π΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠΊ. НСобходимо ΡƒΠ΄Π΅Π»ΡΡ‚ΡŒ Π²Π½ΠΈΠΌΠ°Π½ΠΈΠ΅ возмоТности развития послСопСрационных ΠΈΠ½Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ†ΠΈΠΎΠ½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ослоТнСний.

    Impact of Preoperative Chemotherapy Features on Patient Outcomes after Hepatectomy for Initially Unresectable Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: A LiverMetSurvey Analysis

    Get PDF
    Background: Prognostic factors have been extensively reported after resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM); however, specific analyses of the impact of preoperative systemic anticancer therapy (PO-SACT) features on outcomes is lacking. Methods: For this real-world evidence study, we used prospectively collected data within the international surgical LiverMetSurvey database from all patients with initially-irresectable CLM. The main outcome was Overall Survival (OS) after surgery. Disease-free (DFS) and hepatic-specific relapse-free survival (HS-RFS) were secondary outcomes. PO-SACT features included duration (cumulative number of cycles), choice of the cytotoxic backbone (oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based), fluoropyrimidine (infusional or oral) and addition or not of targeted monoclonal antibodies (anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF). Results: A total of 2793 patients in the database had received PO-SACT for initially irresectable diseases. Short (<7 or <13 cycles in 1st or 2nd line) PO-SACT duration was independently associated with longer OS (HR: 0.85 p = 0.046), DFS (HR: 0.81; p = 0.016) and HS-RFS (HR: 0.80; p = 0.05). All other PO-SACT features yielded basically comparable results. Conclusions: In this international cohort, provided that PO-SACT allowed conversion to resectability in initially irresectable CLM, surgery performed as soon as technically feasible resulted in the best outcomes. When resection was achieved, our findings indicate that the choice of PO-SACT regimen had a marginal if any, impact on outcomes.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersio

    АутологичныС стимуляторы Ρ€Π΅Π³Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈ ΠΈΠΌΠΏΠ»Π°Π½Ρ‚Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π°Π»Π»ΠΎΠ³Π΅Π½Π½Ρ‹Ρ… костнопластичСских ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ²

    Get PDF
    There are many different surgical techniques for bone reconstruction. However, biological reconstruction methodsΒ are being increasingly developed. The main purpose is not only to fill up defects, but to stimulate the processesΒ of reconstruction and regeneration of bone as a complete organ. In this report, we describe the basic principles ofΒ orthobiology and the essential orthobiological materials. A clinical case is presented where a combination of allogeneic osteoplastic materials with autologous platelet-rich plasma is used to reconstruct aΒ  cavity defect in the tibia.Π’ настоящСС врСмя сущСствуСт мноТСство Ρ€Π°Π·Π½Ρ‹Ρ… ΠΌΠ΅Ρ‚ΠΎΠ΄ΠΎΠ² хирургичСского восстановлСния костной ткани, Π½ΠΎ всС большСС Ρ€Π°Π·Π²ΠΈΡ‚ΠΈΠ΅ ΠΏΠΎΠ»ΡƒΡ‡Π°ΡŽΡ‚ способы биологичСской рСконструкции, основной Ρ†Π΅Π»ΡŒΡŽ ΠΊΠΎΡ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹Ρ… являСтся Π½Π΅ Ρ‚ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΠΊΠΎ восполнСниС Π΄Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚Π°, Π½ΠΎ стимуляция  процСссов Ρ€Π΅Π³Π΅Π½Π΅Ρ€Π°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ восстановлСния кости ΠΊΠ°ΠΊ ΠΎΡ€Π³Π°Π½Π°. Π’ Π΄Π°Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΏΡƒΠ±Π»ΠΈΠΊΠ°Ρ†ΠΈΠΈ Π°Π²Ρ‚ΠΎΡ€Ρ‹ ΠΎΠΏΠΈΡΡ‹Π²Π°ΡŽΡ‚ Π±Π°Π·ΠΎΠ²Ρ‹Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠ½Ρ†ΠΈΠΏΡ‹ ΠΎΡ€Ρ‚ΠΎΠ±ΠΈΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΠΈ ΠΈ основныС ортобиологичСскиС ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»Ρ‹. ΠŸΡ€ΠΈΠ²Π΅Π΄Π΅Π½ клиничСский случай, Π³Π΄Π΅ ΠΏΡ€ΠΈΠΌΠ΅Π½Π΅Π½Π° комбинация аллогСнных костнопластичСских ΠΌΠ°Ρ‚Π΅Ρ€ΠΈΠ°Π»ΠΎΠ² с Π°ΡƒΡ‚ΠΎΠ»ΠΎΠ³ΠΈΡ‡Π½ΠΎΠΉ ΠΎΠ±ΠΎΠ³Π°Ρ‰Π΅Π½Π½ΠΎΠΉ Ρ‚Ρ€ΠΎΠΌΠ±ΠΎΡ†ΠΈΡ‚Π°ΠΌΠΈ ΠΏΠ»Π°Π·ΠΌΠΎΠΉ для рСконструкции полостного Π΄Π΅Ρ„Π΅ΠΊΡ‚Π° Π±ΠΎΠ»ΡŒΡˆΠ΅Π±Π΅Ρ€Ρ†ΠΎΠ²ΠΎΠΉ кости

    RESULTS OF PANITUMUMAB ADDITION TO CONVERSION THERAPY FOR COLORECTAL CANCER LIVER METASTASES

    No full text
    Panitumumab has been shown to increase progression free and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Our purpose was to evaluate whether panitumumab is effective and safe in patients with potentially resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM).Methods. Consecutive analysis of data from 11 patients (KRAS wild) receiving oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy and panitumumab as converse preoperative treatment for potentially resectable CRLM. At the moment of presentation R0-liver resection was not possible due to technical reasons (small remnant volume, large liver vessels involvement etc.). We studied objective response rate, surgical characteristics, skin toxicity profile, and perioperative course. Also expression of EGFR-ligands (transforming growth factor-Ξ± and amphiregulin) and Β Β expression of E-cadherin were studied.Results. After median 6 courses of treatment, metastatic liver tumors were reduced considerably (PR) in 8 pts (73 %). Radical liver resection (R0) with 3 median number of removed segments was done in 6 (55 %) patients. Two pts underwent successfully the two-stage surgery (1 – portal vein embolization and 1 – portal vein ligation with partial left resection). Two patients progressed on chemotherapy (18 %). There was no correlation between skin toxicity and response. Mean blood loss was 250 ml. Preoperative administration of panitumumab was associated with higher risk of postoperative infection complication (57.1 %).Conclusions. To the best of our knowledge this is the first report about using panitumumab as conversion therapy before liver resection. The panitumumab and oxaliplatine-based regimen may increase the resection rate of liver metastases and influence on adhesive and proliferative activity of cancer cells. It is necessary to focus on postoperative infection complications

    Surgical management of patients with colorectal cancer and simultaneous liver and lung metastases

    No full text
    The management of patients with colorectal cancer and simultaneously diagnosed liver and lung metastases (SLLM) remains controversial

    Liver-First Approach for Synchronous Colorectal Metastases: Analysis of 7360 Patients from the LiverMetSurvey Registry

    No full text
    Background: The liver-first approach in patients with synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has gained wide consensus but its role is still to be clarified. We aimed to elucidate the outcome of the liver-first approach and to identify patients who benefit at most from this approach. Methods: Patients with synchronous CRLM included in the LiverMetSurvey registry between 2000 and 2017 were considered. Three strategies were analyzed, i.e. liver-first approach, colorectal resection followed by liver resection (primary-first), and simultaneous resection, and three groups of patients were analyzed, i.e. solitary metastasis, multiple unilobar CRLM, and multiple bilobar CRLM. In each group, patients from the three strategy groups were matched by propensity score analysis. Results: Overall, 7360 patients were analyzed: 4415 primary-first, 552 liver-first, and 2393 simultaneous resections. Compared with the other groups, the liver-first group had more rectal tumors (58.0% vs. 31.2%) and higher hepatic tumor burden (more than three CRLMs: 34.8% vs. 24.0%; size &gt; 50&nbsp;mm: 35.6% vs. 22.8%; p&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;0.001). In patients with solitary and multiple unilobar CRLM, survival was similar regardless of treatment strategy, whereas in patients with multiple bilobar metastases, the liver-first approach was an independent positive prognostic factor, both in unmatched patients (3-year survival 65.9% vs. primary-first 60.4%: hazard ratio [HR] 1.321, p&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.031; vs. simultaneous resections 54.4%: HR 1.624, p&nbsp;&lt;&nbsp;0.001) and after propensity score matching (vs. primary-first: HR 1.667, p&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.017; vs. simultaneous resections: HR 2.278, p&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.003). Conclusion: In patients with synchronous CRLM, the surgical strategy should be decided according to the hepatic tumor burden. In the presence of multiple bilobar CRLM, the liver-first approach is associated with longer survival than the alternative approaches and should be evaluated as standard
    corecore