Successful role of adjuvant radiotherapy in a rare case of tracheal inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor: a case report

BACKGROUND:: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumor (IMT) is a rare benign cancer that can express a more aggressive phenotype related to the genetic mutation of the anaplastic lymphoma kinase receptor (ALK). Involvement of trachea is extremely rare and due to the clinical and radiologic nonspecificity, the definitive diagnosis is based on the histologic evaluation of tissue specimens. Total surgical excision is curative and chemotherapy or radiotherapy has been employed in the treatment of unresectable tumors or as adjuvant therapies. CASE PRESENTATION:: The case described here is being reported because of the rare tracheal location and the atypical treatment approach used for an ALK-positive IMT. A 7-week pregnant woman voluntary interrupted pregnancy and underwent total surgical excision that resulted to have close margins. Although ALK-positive expression indicated the use of ALK inhibitors, she refused any type of adjuvant therapy that could affect ovarian function. Thus, 3D conformational external beam radiotherapy was performed with a daily dose of 180 cGy, 5 times per week, up to 45 Gy at the level of trachea. A total of 62 months of follow-up showed and no signs of disease recurrence or late radiation therapy-related toxicity. CONCLUSIONS: This report describes an extremely rare case of a tracheal IMT, underlying the key role of radiotherapy as adjuvant treatment able to definitively cure IMT, limiting systemic chemotherapy-related toxicity

Focused Ultrasound and External Beam Radiation Therapy for Painful Bone Metastases: A Phase II Clinical Trial

Background: Recent consensus statements and clinical trials have assessed the value of MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery for pain palliation of bone metastases; however, a comparison with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) has not been performed.Purpose: To compare safety and effectiveness data of MRI-guided focused ultrasound and EBRT in the treatment of bone metastases.Materials and Methods: Participants with painful bone metastases, excluding skull and vertebral bodies, were enrolled in a prospec-tive open-label nonrandomized phase II study between January 2017 and May 2019 and underwent either MRI-guided focused ultrasound or EBRT. The primary end point was the overall response rate at 1-month following treatment, assessed via the numeric rating scale (NRS) for pain (0-10 scale, with zero meaning "no pain" and 10 meaning "the worst pain imaginable"). Secondary end points were improvements at 12-month follow-up in NRS and quality of life (QoL) measures, including the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI), QoL-Questionnaire Cancer-15 Palliative Care (QLQ-C15-PAL), and QoL-Questionnaire Bone Metastases-22 (QLQ-BM22) and analysis of adverse events. Statistical analyses, including linear regression, chi 2 test, and Student t test followed the per -protocol principle.Results: Among 198 participants, 100 underwent MRI-guided focused ultrasound (mean age, 63 years +/- 13 [SD]; 51 women), and 98 underwent EBRT (mean age, 65 years +/- 14; 52 women). The overall response rates at 1-month follow-up were 91% (91 of 100) and 67% (66 of 98), respectively, in the focused ultrasound and EBRT arms (P < .001), and complete response rates were 43% (43 of 100) and 16% (16 of 98) (P < .001). The mean baseline NRS score was 7.0 +/- 2.1 for focused ultrasound and 6.6 +/- 2.4 for EBRT (P = .16); at 1-month follow-up, they were reduced to 3.2 +/- 0.3 and 5.1 +/- 0.3 (P < .001), respectively. QLQ-C15-PAL for physical function (P = .002), appetite (P < .001), nausea and vomiting (P < .001), dyspnea (P < .001), and QoL (P < .001) scores were lower in the focused ultrasound group. The overall adverse event rates were 15% (15 of 100) after focused ultrasound and 24% (24 of 98) after EBRT.Conclusion: MRI-guided focused ultrasound surgery and external beam radiation therapy showed similar improvements in pain palliation and quality of life, with low adverse event rates.(c) RSNA, 2023 Supplemental material is available for this article

High Dose Imatinib Is Effective In Children and Adolescents With Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia In Chronic Phase. The Italian Experience

Imatinib (IM) is an established first-line treatment for children with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, the most effective dosage and duration of IM treatment are not well defined. This study was designed to evaluate the response to high-dose IM and long-term outcome in pediatric CML patients, previously untreated or resistant to IFN. Patients aged <18 years with a diagnosis of CML in chronic phase (CP) were treated with IM at a dosage of 340 mg/m2/day. Cytogenetic analysis was performed on bone marrow (BM) cells before and during IM therapy, at planned intervals; quantitative RT-PCR was assessed on peripheral blood (PB) monthly and on BM every 3 months, according to the European LeukemiaNet recommendations for minimal residual disease quantification. Major molecular response (MMR) is defined as <0.1% BCR-ABLIS, while complete MR (CMR) is considered as <0.01% BCR-ABLIS. From March 2001 to February 2013, 45 CML patients in CP (18 females, 27 males; median age: 119/12 years) were recorded from 9 Italian pediatric centers. Eight patients had previously received IFN. IM was started in all patients, including 16 with an HLA-matched sibling. The dosage was modulated according to hematologic toxicity and/or appearance of WHO >2 side- effects, mostly during the first 6 months of treatment (median administered dose: 309 mg/m2/day). Hematologic toxicity (medullary hypoplasia[n=1], neutropenia [n=11] and/or thrombocytopenia [n=6], anemia [n=1]) was observed in14/44 evaluable patients (32%); 13 patients (29.5%) experienced isolated or combined side effects: arthralgia/myalgia (n=10), nausea (n=1), vomiting (n=1), diarrhea (n=1), hepatitis (n=1), edema (n=1). After 3 months of IM treatment, 7/25 of tested patients (28%) obtained complete cytogenetic response (CCyR). Overall, 34/36 evaluable patients (94%) obtained a CCyR at a median time of 6 months. A molecular response (<0.1% BCR-ABLIS) was achieved in 21/26 tested patients (81%) on PB and in 30/33 evaluable patients (91%) on BM. Seventeen of 26 patients (65%), including 2 with a HLA-matched sibling, obtained a CMR on PB cells and 19/33 (55%) on BM cells at a median time of 15 and 19 months, respectively. With the aim of reducing the risk of longitudinal growth impairment or to improve treatment compliance, 9 patients with sustained CMR and 2 adolescents with MMR lasting >12 months received IM at the same daily dosage for 3 weeks a month (intermittent therapy). IM given without interruption was resumed in 3 of these 9 patients because of an increased BCR-ABL transcript. The growth rate showed a delay in height, which recovered over time, in 6 children who received IM prior to puberty. Overall, IM was stopped in 22/44 evaluable patients (50%) because of various reasons: stem cell transplant (SCT) in 8 patients (3 in CP, 1 in CCyR, 3 in MMR, 1 in CMR); hematologic (n=2) or extra-hematologic toxicity (n=2) (WHO grading >3) during the first 6 months in 4; recurrent disease in 6 (3 increased BCR-ABL transcript, 2 cytogenetic relapse,1 blast crisis [BC]); no response in 1; CMR ( <0.0032% BCR-ABL IS) lasting >88 months in 2 and pancreatitis in 1 patient in CMR for 75 months. Twelve patients underwent a SCT after a median time of 8 months: 8 from an identical siblings (5 responders to IM [1 CMR, 3 MMR, 1 CCyR]), 3 MUD (2 in CCyR and 1 in MMR) and 1 cord blood in CCyR after chemotherapy for CB. Three patients, transplanted from an identical sibling, had disease recurrence after 24 (molecular relapse), 36 (cytogenetic relapse) and 83 (BC) months, respectively. At the last follow-up, all patients are alive (CMR= 25; MMR=14; CCyR=3; minor CyR=2; too early=1) at a median of 52 months (range: 3-146). Of 42 patients evaluable for treatment, 23 are receiving IM at a dosage of 340 mg/m2 (4 intermittent IM); 11 are in CMR without any treatment (8 after SCT; 3 at 32, 33 and 50 months after IM discontinuation); 4 are in treatment with dasatinib, 3 with nilotinib and 1 with IFN. In our experience, higher dose IM is an effective treatment for childhood CP CML, associated with sustained responses. Moreover, IM can be safely discontinued in pediatric CML patients with a deep CMR lasting more than 7 years. For patients candidates to a SCT, IM provides a safe bridging option to transplant, at no increased risk. Since patients may lose their response, a close and regular monitoring should be performed, mostly for those who stop IM, as SCT and new TK inhibitors may be successfully employed in patients failing IM

The management of acute venous thromboembolism in clinical practice - study rationale and protocol of the European PREFER in VTE Registry

Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major health problem, with over one million events every year in Europe. However, there is a paucity of data on the current management in real life, including factors influencing treatment pathways, patient satisfaction, quality of life (QoL), and utilization of health care resources and the corresponding costs. The PREFER in VTE registry has been designed to address this and to understand medical care and needs as well as potential gaps for improvement. Methods/design: The PREFER in VTE registry was a prospective, observational, multicenter study conducted in seven European countries including Austria, France Germany, Italy, Spain, Switzerland, and the UK to assess the characteristics and the management of patients with VTE, the use of health care resources, and to provide data to estimate the costs for 12 months treatment following a first-time and/or recurrent VTE diagnosed in hospitals or specialized or primary care centers. In addition, existing anticoagulant treatment patterns, patient pathways, clinical outcomes, treatment satisfaction, and health related QoL were documented. The centers were chosen to reflect the care environment in which patients with VTE are managed in each of the participating countries. Patients were eligible to be enrolled into the registry if they were at least 18 years old, had a symptomatic, objectively confirmed first time or recurrent acute VTE defined as either distal or proximal deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism or both. After the baseline visit at the time of the acute VTE event, further follow-up documentations occurred at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months. Follow-up data was collected by either routinely scheduled visits or by telephone calls. Results: Overall, 381 centers participated, which enrolled 3,545 patients during an observational period of 1 year. Conclusion: The PREFER in VTE registry will provide valuable insights into the characteristics of patients with VTE and their acute and mid-term management, as well as into drug utilization and the use of health care resources in acute first-time and/or recurrent VTE across Europe in clinical practice. Trial registration: Registered in DRKS register, ID number: DRKS0000479