Muc2-dependent microbial colonization of the jejunal mucus layer is diet sensitive and confers local resistance to enteric pathogen infection.

Intestinal mucus barriers normally prevent microbial infections but are sensitive to diet-dependent changes in the luminal environment. Here we demonstrate that mice fed a Western-style diet (WSD) suffer regiospecific failure of the mucus barrier in the small intestinal jejunum caused by diet-induced mucus aggregation. Mucus barrier disruption due to either WSD exposure or chromosomal Muc2 deletion results in collapse of the commensal jejunal microbiota, which in turn sensitizes mice to atypical jejunal colonization by the enteric pathogen Citrobacter rodentium. We illustrate the jejunal mucus layer as a microbial habitat, and link the regiospecific mucus dependency of the microbiota to distinctive properties of the jejunal niche. Together, our data demonstrate a symbiotic mucus-microbiota relationship that normally prevents jejunal pathogen colonization, but is highly sensitive to disruption by exposure to a WSD

Citrobacter rodentium and Escherichia coli interactions with mucus producing colonic epithelical cells

The epithelial cells together with the mucus layer protect the host from noxious luminal substances and pathogenic invasion. Pathogens have evolved numerous strategies to circumvent these barriers and mount infection. C. rodentium is a murine model for the attaching and effacing intestinal E. coli (EPEC, EHEC) and share similar virulence strategies to infect their host. We found that the colonic mucus layer is dynamically regulated by C. rodentium and the ensuing cytokine response. The cytokine profile investigated during the course of infection indicated a shift from pro- to an anti-inflammatory type of response at times of increased mucus layer thickness. The in vitro effect of signature cytokines of pro- and anti-inflammatory responses and the pathogens (EPEC, ETEC and C. rodentium) indicated that changes in mucin production and secretion are affected by the combined impact of these factors. The anti-inflammatory cytokine IL-4 alleviated mitochondrial dysfunction in vitro and accelerated mucin production and secretion, especially in the presence of EPEC, ETEC and C. rodentium. In vivo IL-4 treatment improved mitochondria and barrier functions and colitis symptoms. Similarly, VIP alleviated mitochondrial dysfunction during infection. The lack of Fpr2 lead to decreased barrier function and increased susceptibility to C. rodentium and EPEC infection. Harnessing the host’s response to pathogens could improve the intestinal mucus barrier function by enhancing mucosal healing and shortening the duration of infection

Colonic levels of vasoactive intestinal peptide decrease during infection and exogenous VIP protects epithelial mitochondria against the negative effects of IFNγ and TNFα induced during Citrobacter rodentium infection.

Citrobacter rodentium infection is a model for infection with attaching and effacing pathogens, such as enteropathogenic Escherichia coli. The vasoactive intestinal peptide (VIP) has emerged as an anti-inflammatory agent, documented to inhibit Th1 immune responses and successfully treat animal models of inflammation. VIP is also a mucus secretagogue. Here, we found that colonic levels of VIP decrease during murine C. rodentium infection with a similar time dependency as measurements reflecting mitochondrial function and epithelial integrity. The decrease in VIP appears mainly driven by changes in the cytokine environment, as no changes in VIP levels were detected in infected mice lacking interferon gamma (IFNγ). VIP supplementation alleviated the reduction of activity and levels of mitochondrial respiratory complexes I and IV, mitochondrial phosphorylation capacity, transmembrane potential and ATP generation caused by IFNγ, TNFα and C. rodentium infection, in an in vitro mucosal surface. Similarly, VIP treatment regimens that included the day 5-10 post infection period alleviated decreases in enzyme complexes I and IV, phosphorylation capacity, mitochondrial transmembrane potential and ATP generation as well as increased apoptosis levels during murine infection with C. rodentium. However, VIP treatment failed to alleviate colitis, although there was a tendency to decreased pathogen density in contact with the epithelium and in the spleen. Both in vivo and in vitro, NO generation increased during C. rodentium infection, which was alleviated by VIP. Thus, therapeutic VIP administration to restore the decreased levels during infection had beneficial effects on epithelial cells and their mitochondria, but not on the overall infection outcome

<i>Aeromonas salmonicida</i> binds α2-6 linked sialic acid, which is absent among the glycosphingolipid repertoires from skin, gill, stomach, pyloric caecum, and intestine

Carbohydrates can both protect against infection and act as targets promoting infection. Mucins are major components of the slimy mucus layer covering the fish epithelia. Mucins can act as decoys for intimate pathogen interaction with the host afforded by binding to glycosphingolipids in the host cell membrane. We isolated and characterized glycosphingolipids from Atlantic salmon skin, gill, stomach, pyloric caeca, and intestine. We characterized the glycosphingolipids using liquid chromatography – mass spectrometry and tandem mass spectrometry and the glycan repertoire was compared with the glycan repertoire of mucins from the same epithelia. We also investigated Aeromonas salmonicida binding using chromatogram and microtiter well based binding assays. We identified 29 glycosphingolipids. All detected acid glycans were of the ganglio-series (unless shorter) and showed a high degree of polysialylation. The non-acid glycans were mostly composed of the neolacto, globo, and ganglio core structures. The glycosphingolipid repertoire differed between epithelia and the proportion of the terminal moieties of the glycosphingolipids did not reflect the terminal moieties on the mucins from the same epithelia. A. salmonicida did not bind the Atlantic salmon glycosphingolipids. Instead, we identified that A. salmonicida binding to sialic acid occurred to α2–6 Neu5Ac but not to α2–3 Neu5Ac. α2–6 Neu5Ac was present on mucins whereas mainly α2–3 Neu5Ac was found on the glycosphingolipids, explaining the difference in A. salmonicida binding ability between these host glycoconjugates. A. salmonicida´s ability to bind to Atlantic salmon mucins, but not the glycosphingolipids, is likely part of the host defence against this pathogen.</p