Variability in Uremic Control during Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration in Trauma Patients

Introduction. Acute kidney injury (AKI) necessitating continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a severe complication in trauma patients (TP). We wanted to assess daily duration of CRRT and its impact on uremic control in TP. Material and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed adult TP, with or without rhabdomyolysis, with AKI undergoing CRRT. Data on daily CRRT duration and causes for temporary stops were collected from the first five CRRT days. Uremic control was assessed by daily changes in serum urea (Δurea) and creatinine (Δcreatinine) concentrations. Results. Thirty-six TP were included with a total of 150 CRRT days, 17 (43%) with rhabdomyolysis. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) time per day with CRRT was 19 (15–21) hours. There was a significant correlation between daily CRRT duration and Δurea (r = 0.60, P≤0.001) and Δcreatinine (r = 0.43; P = 0.012). CRRT pauses were caused by filter clotting (54%), therapeutic interventions (25%), catheter related problems (10%), filter timeout (6%), and diagnostic procedures (6%). Rhabdomyolysis did not affect the CRRT data. Conclusions. TP undergoing CRRT had short daily CRRT duration causing reduced uremic control. Clinicians should modify their daily clinical practice to improve technical skills and achieve sufficient dialysis dose

Vasoactive and/or inotropic drugs in initial resuscitation of burn injuries: A systematic review

Background According to current guidelines, initial burn resuscitation should be performed with fluids alone. The aims of the study were to review the frequency of use of vasoactive and/or inotropic drugs in initial burn resuscitation, and assess the benefits and harms of adding such drugs to fluids. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, UpToDate, and SveMed+ through 3 December 2021. The search included studies on critically ill burn patients receiving vasoactive and/or inotropic drugs in addition to fluids within 48 h after burn injury. Results The literature search identified 1058 unique publications that were screened for inclusion. After assessing 115 publications in full text, only two retrospective cohort studies were included. One study found that 16 out of 52 (31%) patients received vasopressor(s). Factors associated with vasopressor use were increasing age, burn depth, and % total body surface area (TBSA) burnt. Another study observed that 20 out of 111 (18%) patients received vasopressor(s). Vasopressor use was associated with increasing age, Baux score, and %TBSA burnt in addition to more frequent dialysis treatment and increased mortality. Study quality assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale was considered good in one study, but uncertain due to limited description of methods in the other. Conclusion This systematic review revealed that there is a lack of evidence regarding the benefits and harms of using vasoactive and/or inotropic drugs in addition to fluids during early resuscitation of patients with major burns.publishedVersio

Primary Injuries and Secondary Organ Failures in Trauma Patients with Acute Kidney Injury Treated with Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

Background. Acute kidney injury (AKI) treated with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a severe complication in trauma patients. The aim of the study was to assess primary traumatic injuries and secondary organ failures in severe posttraumatic AKI. Methods. Retrospective review of adult trauma patients admitted to the trauma centre at Oslo University Hospital Ullevål. Injury severity score (ISS) was used to assess the severity of primary injuries, and sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score was utilized to measure secondary organ failures. Results. Forty-two (8%) of 506 trauma patients admitted to intensive care unit developed AKI treated with CRRT, whereof 40 (95%) suffered blunt trauma mechanisms. Patients had extensive primary organ injuries with median (interquartile range) ISS 36 (27–49). The majority of the patients had respiratory (93% intubated) and cardiovascular (67% with inotropic and/or vasoactive medication) failure within 24 hours after admission. AKI was often part of multiple organ failure, most frequently respiratory and cardiovascular failure, affecting 33 (75%) and 30 (71%) of the patients, respectively. Conclusion. Trauma patients with AKI undergoing CRRT often had severe primary injuries due to blunt trauma. Most of them suffered from secondary multiple organ failure concomitant to AKI

Barriers and challenges in the process of including critically ill patients in clinical studies

Background Clinical research in severely ill or injured patients is required to improve healthcare but may be challenging to perform in practice. The aim of this study was to analyse barriers and challenges in the process of including critically ill patients in clinical studies. Methods Data from critically ill patients considered for inclusion in an observational study of venous thromboembolism in Norway were analysed. This included quantitative and qualitative information from the screening log, consent forms and research notes. Results Among 279 eligible critically ill patients, 204 (73%) were omitted from the study due to challenges and barriers in the inclusion process. Reasons for omission were categorised as practical in 133 (65%), medical in 31 (15%), and legal or ethical in 40 (20%) of the patients. Among 70 included patients, 29 (41%) consents were from patients and 41 (59%) from their next of kin. Several challenges were described herein; these included whether patients were competent to give consent, and which next of kin that should represent the patient. Furthermore, some included patients were unable to recall what they have consented, and some appeared unable to separate research from treatment. Conclusions Barriers and challenges in the inclusion process led to the omission of near three out of four eligible patients. This analysis provided information about where the problem resides and may be solved. The majority of challenges among included patients were related to issues of autonomy and validity of consent. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03405766)

Clinical Study Variability in Uremic Control during Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration in Trauma Patients

Introduction. Acute kidney injury (AKI) necessitating continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is a severe complication in trauma patients (TP). We wanted to assess daily duration of CRRT and its impact on uremic control in TP. Material and Methods. We retrospectively reviewed adult TP, with or without rhabdomyolysis, with AKI undergoing CRRT. Data on daily CRRT duration and causes for temporary stops were collected from the first five CRRT days. Uremic control was assessed by daily changes in serum urea (Δurea) and creatinine (Δcreatinine) concentrations. Results. Thirty-six TP were included with a total of 150 CRRT days, 17 (43%) with rhabdomyolysis. The median (interquartile range (IQR)) time per day with CRRT was 19 (15-21) hours. There was a significant correlation between daily CRRT duration and Δurea (r = 0.60, P ≤ 0.001) and Δcreatinine (r = 0.43; P = 0.012). CRRT pauses were caused by filter clotting (54%), therapeutic interventions (25%), catheter related problems (10%), filter timeout (6%), and diagnostic procedures (6%). Rhabdomyolysis did not affect the CRRT data. Conclusions. TP undergoing CRRT had short daily CRRT duration causing reduced uremic control. Clinicians should modify their daily clinical practice to improve technical skills and achieve sufficient dialysis dose

Utility of coagulation analyses to assess thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin in intensive care unit patients

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of coagulation analyses to assess thromboprophylaxis with dalteparin in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Methods Prospective observational study of ICU patients receiving dalteparin prophylaxis at Oslo University Hospital in Norway. Trough and peak antithrombin, protein C, anti‐factor Xa activity (aFXa), d‐dimer, thromboelastography, calibrated automated thrombogram and microparticles were analysed. Levels were compared in patients with and without venous thromboembolism (VTE), major bleeding, acute kidney injury (AKI) with use of renal replacement therapy (RRT) and variable dalteparin dose. Results Among 50 included patients (76% male, mean age 62 years) five (10%) developed VTE and eight (16%) major bleeding. Median through aFXa level was 0.03 (0.02‐0.05) IU/mL, and 48 (96%) of patients were within and two (4%) above target range. Peak aFXa level was 0.21 (0.13‐0.29) IU/mL, the number of patients below, within and above prophylactic range were 21 (42%), 25 (50%) and four (8%). Peak aFXa levels were similar in patients with and without VTE (0.18 vs 0.21 IU/L, P = .72), major bleeding (0.22 vs 0.21 IU/mL, P = .38) and AKI with RRT (0.18 vs 0.24, P = .13), but lower in patients receiving dalteparin 5000 IU od compared to 7500 IU od (0.19 vs 0.30 IU/mL, P < .01). Conclusions Intensive care unit patients receiving dalteparin prophylaxis had half of patients within prophylactic peak aFXa target range. Peak aFXa levels was affected by administered dalteparin dose, but not presence of VTE, major bleeding or AKI with RRT

Vasoactive and/or inotropic drugs in initial resuscitation of burn injuries: A systematic review

Background According to current guidelines, initial burn resuscitation should be performed with fluids alone. The aims of the study were to review the frequency of use of vasoactive and/or inotropic drugs in initial burn resuscitation, and assess the benefits and harms of adding such drugs to fluids. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, UpToDate, and SveMed+ through 3 December 2021. The search included studies on critically ill burn patients receiving vasoactive and/or inotropic drugs in addition to fluids within 48 h after burn injury. Results The literature search identified 1058 unique publications that were screened for inclusion. After assessing 115 publications in full text, only two retrospective cohort studies were included. One study found that 16 out of 52 (31%) patients received vasopressor(s). Factors associated with vasopressor use were increasing age, burn depth, and % total body surface area (TBSA) burnt. Another study observed that 20 out of 111 (18%) patients received vasopressor(s). Vasopressor use was associated with increasing age, Baux score, and %TBSA burnt in addition to more frequent dialysis treatment and increased mortality. Study quality assessed by the Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale was considered good in one study, but uncertain due to limited description of methods in the other. Conclusion This systematic review revealed that there is a lack of evidence regarding the benefits and harms of using vasoactive and/or inotropic drugs in addition to fluids during early resuscitation of patients with major burns

Acute kidney injury in burn patients admitted to the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common complication in burn patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) associated with increased morbidity and mortality. Our primary aim was to review incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of AKI in burn patients admitted to the ICU. Secondary aims were to review the use of renal replacement therapy (RRT) and impact on health care costs. Methods We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, UpToDate, and NICE through 3 December 2018. All reviews in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews except protocols were added to the PubMed search. We searched for studies on AKI according to Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of kidney function, and End-stage kidney disease (RIFLE); Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN); and/or Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria in burn patients admitted to the ICU. We collected data on AKI incidence, risk factors, use of RRT, renal recovery, length of stay (LOS), mortality, and health care costs. Results We included 33 observational studies comprising 8200 patients. Overall study quality, scored according to the Newcastle-Ottawa scale, was moderate. Random effect model meta-analysis revealed that the incidence of AKI among burn patients in the ICU was 38 (30–46) %. Patients with AKI were almost evenly distributed in the mild, moderate, and severe AKI subgroups. RRT was used in 12 (8–16) % of all patients. Risk factors for AKI were high age, chronic hypertension, diabetes mellitus, high Total Body Surface Area percent burnt, high Abbreviated Burn Severity Index score, inhalation injury, rhabdomyolysis, surgery, high Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score, high Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score, sepsis, and mechanical ventilation. AKI patients had 8.6 (4.0–13.2) days longer ICU LOS and higher mortality than non-AKI patients, OR 11.3 (7.3–17.4). Few studies reported renal recovery, and no study reported health care costs. Conclusions AKI occurred in 38% of burn patients admitted to the ICU, and 12% of all patients received RRT. Presence of AKI was associated with increased LOS and mortality. Trial registration PROSPERO (CRD42017060420

Tidlig aktivitet hos respiratorpasienter – en metaanalyse

BAKGRUNN I Norge ble nesten 8 500 pasienter behandlet med respirator i 2019. Vi har undersøkt hvilken effekt tidlig aktivitet hos voksne respiratorbehandlede intensivpasienter har på varighet av respiratorbehandling, avvenningstid fra respirator, dødelighet, liggetid og uheldige hendelser. KUNNSKAPSGRUNNLAG Vi gjennomførte et systematisk litteratursøk etter randomiserte, kontrollerte studier i ni databaser. To forfattere selekterte studier, ekstraherte data og vurderte tilliten til dokumentasjonen med GRADE-metoden. RESULTATER 3 270 sammendrag og titler ble lest. Vi inkluderte 17 studier med 1 805 pasienter og middels til lav risiko for systematisk skjevhet. Analysene viste effekt av tidlig mobilisering med gjennomsnittlig kortere respiratorbehandling (−1,43 døgn; 95 % KI −2,68 til −0,18, p = 0,02) og kortere liggetid i intensivavdeling (−1,08 døgn; 95 % KI −1,95 til −0,21, p = 0,02), med middels tillit til dokumentasjonen. Inspirasjonsmuskeltrening viste ingen effekt på varighet av respiratorbehandling (−0,11; 95 % KI −1,76 til 1,53, p = 0,89) eller avvenningstid fra respirator (−0,33; 95 % KI −1,31 til 0,65, p = 0,51), med liten tillit til dokumentasjonen. Verken tidlig mobilisering eller inspirasjonsmuskeltrening påvirket dødelighet. Det ble rapportert få uheldige hendelser. FORTOLKNING Analysene viser at tidlig mobilisering er trygt og kan gi kortere respiratorbehandlingstid og kortere liggetid i intensivavdeling, men tiltakene har ikke effekt på dødelighet. Inspirasjonsmuskeltrening viste ingen effekt på utfallsmålene