Mortality associated with the use of inappropiate drugs according Beers Criteria: a systematic review

The aims of this systematic review are to identify and analyse the scientist literature available evidence about the use of potentially inappropriate medications, according to the Beers Criteria, that is associated with mortality in the elderly people.It have been made a search of publications in most traditional electronic databases among the scientific community (Pubmed / Medline, EMBASE and Web of Science) and it have been selected publications that obey the criteria of 'observational study', 'elderly' and 'Beers Criteria' and that they had as a result the mortality of the study population .After publications selection it proceeded to dump data by two researchers independently to avoid selection bias. The methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed by the checklist Newcastle-Ottawa. The final sample of this systematic review has been made up of 17 studies published in Pubmed and Embase databases majority, 8 of which make up the meta-analysis. In descriptive synthesis has been observed that most of the studies have a level of evidence IV (94'1%) with cohortdelineation (94'1%) and non-probability sampling technique (70'6%).Data collection was prospective in 58'8% of cases, with a sample (n) greater than 1000 elderly (64'7%) and followed up for 6 to 12 months (52'9%).The meta-analysis involving 90.611 elders informed that users who take inappropriate drug according to the Beers Criteria had a higher relative risk for mortality outcome (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 1'01-1'22 P = 0'023), regardless of study stage, comorbidity presence, polypharmacy or type of inappropriate medication used

Potentially inappropriate medications with older people in intensive care and associated factors: a historic cohort study

ABSTRACT BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in critical care units remains limited, especially in terms of the factors associated with their use. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence and factors associated with PIMs use in intensive care units. DESIGN AND SETTING: Historical cohort study was conducted in a high-complexity hospital in Brazil. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted on 314 patients aged ≥ 60 years who were admitted to intensive care units (ICUs) at a high-complexity hospital in Brazil. The dates were extracted from a “Patient Safety Project” database. A Chi-square test, Student’s t-test, and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to assess which factors were associated with PIMs. The statistical significance was set at 5%. RESULTS: According to Beers’ criteria, 12.8% of the identified drugs were considered inappropriate for the elderly population. The incidence rate of PIMs use was 45.8%. The most frequently used PIMs were metoclopramide, insulin, antipsychotics, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and benzodiazepines. Factors associated with PIMs use were the number of medications (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17), length of hospital stay (OR = 1.07), and excessive potential drug interactions (OR = 2.43). CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the older adults in ICUs received PIM. Patients taking PIMs had a longer length of stay in the ICU, higher numbers of medications, and higher numbers of potential drug interactions. In ICUs, the use of explicit methods combined with clinical judgment can contribute to the safety and quality of medication prescriptions

Mortality associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications, according to the Beers criteria: systematic review and metaanalysis.

Na atualidade, a questão dos eventos adversos a medicamentos nos idosos apresenta grande importância, dada a expansão populacional deste grupo e o impacto negativo destes eventos, que muitas vezes apresenta associação com o uso de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados (MPI). Tendo em vista que os resultados dos estudos sobre o impacto do uso de MPI na mortalidade de idosos, ainda são inconclusivos, o objetivo foi identificar e analisar na literatura científica as evidências de que o uso de MPI em idosos, segundo critério de Beers, encontra-se associado a mortalidade. Trata-se de uma revisão sistemática finalizada em 20 de Julho de 2012, cujos procedimentos metodológicos seguiram as recomendações do Joanna Briggs Institutte e Systematic Reviews Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Na busca das publicações foram utilizadas as bases de dados Pubmed/Medline, Lilacs, Scopus, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of science, Sciencedirect; CINAHL, Current contents connect, Proquest Dissertation and Theses, Banco de teses-CAPES. A seleção das publicações e extração das informações dos estudos foi realizada por dois investigadores de forma independente. A qualidade metodológica dos estudos foi avaliada pela lista de verificação Newcastle-Ottawa. A amostra da RS foi constituída por 17 estudos, sendo que destes, oito publicações compuseram a metanálise. Na síntese descritiva observou-se que a maioria dos estudos apresentou nível de evidência IV (94,1%), cujo delineamento foi coorte (94,1%), usou técnica de amostragem não probabilística (64,7%), coletou dados de modo prospectivo (64,7%), utilizou amostra superior a 1.000 idosos (64,7%), realizou seguimento de 12 a 24 meses (52,9%) e a obtenção do desfecho mortalidade ocorreu em bases de dados (64,7%). A metanálise que totalizou a participação de 90.611 participantes apontou que idosos que utilizaram MPI apresentaram maior risco relativo para o desfecho de mortalidade (RR=1,11; IC 95% 1,01 1,22; p = 0,023), de acordo com os critérios de Beers, independente do cenário do estudo, da existência de comorbidades, de polifarmácia ou do tipo de MPI usado.Currently, the issue of adverse drug events in the elderly presents great importance, given the expansion of this population group and the negative impact of these events, which often presents association with the use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIM). Having in mind that the results of studies on the impact of using MPI elderly mortality are still inconclusive, the aim was to identify and analyze the evidences in the scientific literature that the use of PIM in the elderly, according to the Beers criteria, is associated with mortality. This is a Systematic Review finalized in July 20, 2012, whose methodological procedures followed the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institutte and Systematic Reviews - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. In the search of the publications were used databases Pubmed / Medline, Lilacs, Scopus, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of science, Sciencedirect, CINAHL, Current Contents Connect, Proquest Dissertation and Theses database-CAPES. The selection of publications and extraction of the information of the studies was conducted by two researchers independently. The methodological quality of studies was assessed by checklist Newcastle-Ottawa. The sample was composed of RS 17 studies, of which eight publications were included in the meta-analysis. In the synthesis descriptive observed that most studies showed level of evidence IV (94.1%), whose design was cohort (94.1%) used non-probability sampling technique (64.7%), collected data from prospectively (64.7%) used sample of more than 1,000 elderly (64.7%), realized during 12 to 24 months (52.9%) and obtaining of outcome mortality occurred in databases (64.7% ). The meta-analysis which totaled the participation of 90,611 participants pointed out that the elderly who have used PIM had higher relative risk for the outcome of mortality (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.22, p = 0.023), according to Beers criteria, regardless of the setting of the study, the existence of co-morbidities, polypharmacy, or the type of PIM used

Mortality associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medications, according to the Beers criteria: systematic review and metaanalysis.

Na atualidade, a questão dos eventos adversos a medicamentos nos idosos apresenta grande importância, dada a expansão populacional deste grupo e o impacto negativo destes eventos, que muitas vezes apresenta associação com o uso de medicamentos potencialmente inapropriados (MPI). Tendo em vista que os resultados dos estudos sobre o impacto do uso de MPI na mortalidade de idosos, ainda são inconclusivos, o objetivo foi identificar e analisar na literatura científica as evidências de que o uso de MPI em idosos, segundo critério de Beers, encontra-se associado a mortalidade. Trata-se de uma revisão sistemática finalizada em 20 de Julho de 2012, cujos procedimentos metodológicos seguiram as recomendações do Joanna Briggs Institutte e Systematic Reviews Centre for Reviews and Dissemination guidance for undertaking reviews in health care. Na busca das publicações foram utilizadas as bases de dados Pubmed/Medline, Lilacs, Scopus, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of science, Sciencedirect; CINAHL, Current contents connect, Proquest Dissertation and Theses, Banco de teses-CAPES. A seleção das publicações e extração das informações dos estudos foi realizada por dois investigadores de forma independente. A qualidade metodológica dos estudos foi avaliada pela lista de verificação Newcastle-Ottawa. A amostra da RS foi constituída por 17 estudos, sendo que destes, oito publicações compuseram a metanálise. Na síntese descritiva observou-se que a maioria dos estudos apresentou nível de evidência IV (94,1%), cujo delineamento foi coorte (94,1%), usou técnica de amostragem não probabilística (64,7%), coletou dados de modo prospectivo (64,7%), utilizou amostra superior a 1.000 idosos (64,7%), realizou seguimento de 12 a 24 meses (52,9%) e a obtenção do desfecho mortalidade ocorreu em bases de dados (64,7%). A metanálise que totalizou a participação de 90.611 participantes apontou que idosos que utilizaram MPI apresentaram maior risco relativo para o desfecho de mortalidade (RR=1,11; IC 95% 1,01 1,22; p = 0,023), de acordo com os critérios de Beers, independente do cenário do estudo, da existência de comorbidades, de polifarmácia ou do tipo de MPI usado.Currently, the issue of adverse drug events in the elderly presents great importance, given the expansion of this population group and the negative impact of these events, which often presents association with the use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications (PIM). Having in mind that the results of studies on the impact of using MPI elderly mortality are still inconclusive, the aim was to identify and analyze the evidences in the scientific literature that the use of PIM in the elderly, according to the Beers criteria, is associated with mortality. This is a Systematic Review finalized in July 20, 2012, whose methodological procedures followed the recommendations of the Joanna Briggs Institutte and Systematic Reviews - Centre for Reviews and Dissemination Guidance for Undertaking Reviews in Health Care. In the search of the publications were used databases Pubmed / Medline, Lilacs, Scopus, Embase, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, Web of science, Sciencedirect, CINAHL, Current Contents Connect, Proquest Dissertation and Theses database-CAPES. The selection of publications and extraction of the information of the studies was conducted by two researchers independently. The methodological quality of studies was assessed by checklist Newcastle-Ottawa. The sample was composed of RS 17 studies, of which eight publications were included in the meta-analysis. In the synthesis descriptive observed that most studies showed level of evidence IV (94.1%), whose design was cohort (94.1%) used non-probability sampling technique (64.7%), collected data from prospectively (64.7%) used sample of more than 1,000 elderly (64.7%), realized during 12 to 24 months (52.9%) and obtaining of outcome mortality occurred in databases (64.7% ). The meta-analysis which totaled the participation of 90,611 participants pointed out that the elderly who have used PIM had higher relative risk for the outcome of mortality (RR = 1.11, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.22, p = 0.023), according to Beers criteria, regardless of the setting of the study, the existence of co-morbidities, polypharmacy, or the type of PIM used

Análise custo-efetividade da implementação da enfermagem de práticas avançadas: como avançar?

O presente ensaio explora possibilidades de avanços na avaliação custo-efetividade (ACE) da enfermagem de práticas avançadas (EPA). Os argumentos foram estruturados segundo o panorama de saúde atual, necessidade de avaliação das práticas da EPA, como tecnologia em saúde, evidências e recomendações para condução de análise custo-efetividade. Benefícios da enfermagem de práticas avançadas foram evidenciados na melhora de indicadores como mortalidade, readmissão hospitalar, entre outros. Todavia, a ausência de um padrão de cuidados, combinada com a existência de modelos distintos e curto horizonte temporal, interferiram na estimativa de custos diretos. Os estudos foram inconclusivos acerca da análise custo-efetividade, sobretudo pela ausência de custo por unidade de sucesso e cálculo da razão ACE. No contexto da enfermagem de práticas avançadas, a condução de análise custo-efetividade que contribua com resultados robustos, subsidiando na tomada de decisões, requer esforço conjunto de instituições formadoras, delimitação e normatização da prática por órgãos reguladores da profissão e, de serviços de saúde, alicerçados, especialmente em políticas de acreditação.Este ensayo explora las posibilidades de avances en la evaluación de costo-efectividad (ECA) de la enfermería de práctica avanzada (EPA). Los argumentos se estructuraron según el escenario de salud actual, la necesidad de evaluar las prácticas de la EPA, como tecnología sanitaria, evidencia y recomendaciones para realizar análisis de costo-efectividad. Los beneficios de la enfermería de práctica avanzada se evidenciaron en la mejora de los indicadores como mortalidad, reingreso hospitalario, entre otros. Sin embargo, la falta de un estándar de cuidados, combinado con la existencia de diferentes modelos y el corto plazo, interfirió en la estimación de los costos directos. Los estudios no fueron concluyentes sobre el análisis de costo-efectividad, principalmente debido a la falta de costo por unidad de éxito y cálculo de la relación ACE. En el contexto de la enfermería de práctica avanzada, la realización de análisis de costo-efectividad que contribuya a resultados robustos apoyando la toma de decisiones requiere un esfuerzo conjunto de las instituciones de formación, delimitación y estandarización de la práctica por parte de los organismos reguladores de la profesión y los servicios de salud fundamentados, especialmente, en las políticas de acreditación.This essay explores possibilities of advances in cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) in advanced practice nursing (APN). The arguments were structured according to the current health landscape, the need to evaluate APN practices as health technology and evidence and recommendations for conducting CEA. Benefits of APN were evidenced in the improvement of indicators such as mortality, hospital readmission, among others. However, the absence of a standard of care, combined with the existence of different models and short time horizon interfered with the estimation of direct costs. The studies on CEA were inconclusive, mainly due to the lack of cost per unit of success and calculation of the CEA ratio. In the context of the APN, to conduct CEA that really contributes to robust results, thus subsidizing decision-making requires a joint effort of training institutions, delimitation and standardization of practice by regulatory agencies of the profession and health services, based especially on accreditation policies