12 research outputs found

    The Role of Para-Aortic Lymphadenectomy in the Surgical Staging of Women with Intermediate and High-Risk Endometrial Adenocarcinomas

    No full text
    Objectives. To characterize clinical outcomes in patients with intermediate or high-risk endometrial carcinoma who underwent surgical staging with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Methods. This is a retrospective cohort study of patients with intermediate or high-risk endometrial adenocarcinoma who underwent surgical staging with (PPALN group) or without (PLN) para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Data were collected, Kaplan-Meier curves were generated, and univariate and multivariate analyses performed to compare differences in adjuvant therapy, disease recurrence, disease-free survival (DFS), and overall survival (OS). Results. 118 patients were included in the PPALN group and 139 in the PLN group. Patients in the PPALN group were more likely to receive adjuvant vaginal brachytherapy (25.4% versus 11.5%, OR = 2.5, = 0.03) and less likely to receive adjuvant multimodal combination therapy (17.81% versus 28.8%, OR = 0.28, = 0.002). DFS was improved in the PLN group as compared to PPALN (80% versus 62%, = 0.02). OS was equivalent ( = 0.93). Patients in the PPALN group who had less than 10 para-aortic nodes removed were twice as likely to recur than patients who had 10 or more para-aortic nodes or patients in the PLN group (HR 2.08, CI 1.20-3.60, = 0.009). Conclusions. Patients in the PLN group were more likely to receive multimodal adjuvant therapy and had better DFS than the PPALN group. Pelvic lymphadenectomy followed by adjuvant radiation and chemotherapy may represent an effective treatment option for patients with intermediate or high-risk disease. If systematic para-aortic lymphadenectomy is performed and less than 10 para-aortic lymph nodes are obtained, multimodality adjuvant therapy should be considered to improve DFS

    Protein Kinases and Associated Pathways in Pluripotent State and Lineage Differentiation

    No full text
    Protein kinases (PKs) mediate the reversible conversion of substrate proteins to phosphorylated forms, a key process in controlling intracellular signaling transduction cascades. Pluripotency is, among others, characterized by specifically expressed PKs forming a highly interconnected regulatory network that culminates in a finely-balanced molecular switch. Current high-throughput phosphoproteomic approaches have shed light on the specific regulatory PKs and their function in controlling pluripotent states. Pluripotent cell-derived endothelial and hematopoietic developments represent an example of the importance of pluripotency in cancer therapeutics and organ regeneration. This review attempts to provide the hitherto known kinome profile and the individual characterization of PK-related pathways that regulate pluripotency. Elucidating the underlying intrinsic and extrinsic signals may improve our understanding of the different pluripotent states, the maintenance or induction of pluripotency, and the ability to tailor lineage differentiation, with a particular focus on endothelial cell differentiation for anti-cancer treatment, cell-based tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine strategies

    Low-grade and high-grade serous Mullerian carcinoma: Review and analysis of publicly available gene expression profiles.

    No full text
    OBJECTIVE: Mullerian low grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) and high grade serous carcinoma (HGSC) have distinct molecular profiles, clinical behavior and treatment response. Our objective was to study the biological profiles of these carcinomas. METHODS: This study examines publicly available gene expression profiles of LGSC and HGSC to identify differentially expressed genes and key pathways involved in carcinogenesis and chemotherapy response. RESULTS: Our analysis supports the hypothesis that serous mullerian carcinoma develop through two different pathways yielding two distinct malignancies, namely LGSC and HGSC. Furthermore, genes potentially involved in chemotherapeutic resistance of LGSC were identified. Suppressing the levels of these genes/proteins may increase clinical response to standard chemotherapy in patients with LGSC. CONCLUSION: In summary, this review shows the molecular profile of LGSC and HGSC through multi-center analysis of gene expression profiles of these tumors. The gene signatures of these neoplasms may potentially be used to develop disease-specific, targeted therapy for LGSC and HGSC. Gynecol Oncol 2013 Mar; 128(3):488-92

    BRCA1 Expression Is Epigenetically Repressed in Sporadic Ovarian Cancer Cells by Overexpression of C-Terminal Binding Protein 2

    Get PDF
    INTRODUCTION: Ovarian cancer is the leading cause of mortality from gynecological malignancy despite advancements in novel therapeutics. We have recently demonstrated that the transcriptional co-repressor C-terminal binding protein 2 (CtBP2) is overexpressed in epithelial ovarian carcinoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reverse-transcribed cDNA from CtBP2 wild-type and knockdown ovarian cancer cell lines was hybridized to Affymetrix Gene 1.0 ST microarrays, and differentially expressed genes were studied. Immunohistochemical analysis of CtBP2 and BRCA1 staining of ovarian tissues was performed. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) and luciferase assays were carried out. The effect of the drugs 4-methylthio-2-oxobutyric acid (MTOB) and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor Olaparib on CtBP2 wild-type and knockdown cell lines was examined using methylthiazol tetrazolium assays and an xCELLigence System. RESULTS: Eighty-five genes involved in DNA repair, mitotic checkpoint, nucleosome assembly, and the BRCA1 network were differentially regulated by CtBP2 expression. ChIP and luciferase reporter assays using a BRCA1 promoter-regulated luciferase construct indicated that the CtBP2 complex binds the BRCA1 promoter and represses BRCA1 transcription. Immunohistochemistry illustrated a significant inverse CtBP2 and BRCA1 expression in a panel of malignant ovarian tumor tissues. The CtBP2 inhibitor MTOB suppressed ovarian cancer cell survival in a CtBP2-dependent manner. Ovarian cancer cells with CtBP2 knockdown did not display increased sensitivity to the PARP inhibitor Olaparib. CONCLUSION: CtBP2 is an ovarian cancer oncogene that may play a significant role in epigenetically silencing BRCA1 function in sporadic epithelial ovarian cancer. CtBP2-specific inhibitors, such as MTOB, may be effective adjunct therapies in the management of patients with CtBP2-positive ovarian carcinoma

    Combined Single-Shot Infiltration Between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee and Adductor Canal Block With Bupivacaine, Dexmedetomidine, and Dexamethasone for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity-Matched Analysis

    No full text
    Background: To investigate if combined single-shot adductor canal blockade (ACB) and inļ¬ltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) provide better postoperative pain management compared to ACB alone for patients undergoing unilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients who underwent primary, unilateral TKA. Patients were separated into 2 cohorts: single-shot ACB alone (performed with bupivacaine 0.25%) and combined single-shot ACBĀ + IPACK (performed with bupivacaine 0.25%, dexmedetomidine 1 mg/kg, and dexamethasone 4 mg). Patients were propensity-matched 1:1. The primary study outcome was total opioid consumption converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME) per eight-hour interval and postoperative day. Secondary outcomes included pain scores, length of stay, ambulation distance, return to emergency department, hospital readmission, and 30-day adverse events. Results: One hundred eighty patients were identified, of which propensity matching used 71% to yield 64 patients receiving ACB alone and 64 receiving combined ACBĀ + IPACK. Combined ACBĀ + IPACK had significantly lower total summative MME throughout the entire postoperative stay (PĀ = .002) and cumulatively after the first 24 hours (P < .001). Combined ACBĀ + IPACK also had lower mean pain scores for 0-8 hours (PĀ = .005) and 8-16 hours (PĀ = .009) postoperatively. There were no significant differences in secondary outcomes. Conclusions: Combined single-shot ACBĀ + IPACK block was associated with lower total narcotic intake and mean pain scores during most of the immediate postoperative period following primary, unilateral TKA compared to ACB alone. Implementing longer-acting, single-shot ACBĀ + IPACK for TKA can balance effective and more selective pain management with early rehabilitation
    corecore