34 research outputs found
Technology dictates algorithms: Recent developments in read alignment
Massively parallel sequencing techniques have revolutionized biological and
medical sciences by providing unprecedented insight into the genomes of humans,
animals, and microbes. Modern sequencing platforms generate enormous amounts of
genomic data in the form of nucleotide sequences or reads. Aligning reads onto
reference genomes enables the identification of individual-specific genetic
variants and is an essential step of the majority of genomic analysis
pipelines. Aligned reads are essential for answering important biological
questions, such as detecting mutations driving various human diseases and
complex traits as well as identifying species present in metagenomic samples.
The read alignment problem is extremely challenging due to the large size of
analyzed datasets and numerous technological limitations of sequencing
platforms, and researchers have developed novel bioinformatics algorithms to
tackle these difficulties. Importantly, computational algorithms have evolved
and diversified in accordance with technological advances, leading to todays
diverse array of bioinformatics tools. Our review provides a survey of
algorithmic foundations and methodologies across 107 alignment methods
published between 1988 and 2020, for both short and long reads. We provide
rigorous experimental evaluation of 11 read aligners to demonstrate the effect
of these underlying algorithms on speed and efficiency of read aligners. We
separately discuss how longer read lengths produce unique advantages and
limitations to read alignment techniques. We also discuss how general alignment
algorithms have been tailored to the specific needs of various domains in
biology, including whole transcriptome, adaptive immune repertoire, and human
microbiome studies
Atlas of prostate cancer heritability in European and African-American men pinpoints tissue-specific regulation.
Although genome-wide association studies have identified over 100 risk loci that explain ∼33% of familial risk for prostate cancer (PrCa), their functional effects on risk remain largely unknown. Here we use genotype data from 59,089 men of European and African American ancestries combined with cell-type-specific epigenetic data to build a genomic atlas of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) heritability in PrCa. We find significant differences in heritability between variants in prostate-relevant epigenetic marks defined in normal versus tumour tissue as well as between tissue and cell lines. The majority of SNP heritability lies in regions marked by H3k27 acetylation in prostate adenoc7arcinoma cell line (LNCaP) or by DNaseI hypersensitive sites in cancer cell lines. We find a high degree of similarity between European and African American ancestries suggesting a similar genetic architecture from common variation underlying PrCa risk. Our findings showcase the power of integrating functional annotation with genetic data to understand the genetic basis of PrCa.This work was supported by NIH fellowship F32 GM106584 (AG), NIH grants R01 MH101244(A.G.), R01 CA188392 (B.P.), U01 CA194393(B.P.), R01 GM107427 (M.L.F.), R01 CA193910 (M.L.F./M.P.) and Prostate Cancer Foundation Challenge Award (M.L.F./M.P.). This study makes use of data generated by the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium and the Wellcome Trust Sanger Institute. A full list of the investigators who contributed to the generation of the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium data is available on www.wtccc.org.uk. Funding for the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium project was provided by the Wellcome Trust under award 076113. This study makes use of data generated by the UK10K Consortium. A full list of the investigators who contributed to the generation of the data is available online (http://www.UK10K.org). The PRACTICAL consortium was supported by the following grants: European Commission's Seventh Framework Programme grant agreement n° 223175 (HEALTH-F2-2009-223175), Cancer Research UK Grants C5047/A7357, C1287/A10118, C5047/A3354, C5047/A10692, C16913/A6135 and The National Institute of Health (NIH) Cancer Post-Cancer GWAS initiative Grant: no. 1 U19 CA 148537-01 (the GAME-ON initiative); Cancer Research UK (C1287/A10118, C1287/A 10710, C12292/A11174, C1281/A12014, C5047/A8384, C5047/A15007 and C5047/A10692), the National Institutes of Health (CA128978) and Post-Cancer GWAS initiative (1U19 CA148537, 1U19 CA148065 and 1U19 CA148112—the GAME-ON initiative), the Department of Defense (W81XWH-10-1-0341), A Linneus Centre (Contract ID 70867902), Swedish Research Council (grant no K2010-70X-20430-04-3), the Swedish Cancer Foundation (grant no 09-0677), grants RO1CA056678, RO1CA082664 and RO1CA092579 from the US National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health; US National Cancer Institute (R01CA72818); support from The National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia (126402, 209057, 251533, 396414, 450104, 504700, 504702, 504715, 623204, 940394 and 614296); NIH grants CA63464, CA54281 and CA098758; US National Cancer Institute (R01CA128813, PI: J.Y. Park); Bulgarian National Science Fund, Ministry of Education and Science (contract DOO-119/2009; DUNK01/2–2009; DFNI-B01/28/2012); Cancer Research UK grants [C8197/A10123] and [C8197/A10865]; grant code G0500966/75466; NIHR Health Technology Assessment Programme (projects 96/20/06 and 96/20/99); Cancer Research UK grant number C522/A8649, Medical Research Council of England grant number G0500966, ID 75466 and The NCRI, UK; The US Dept of Defense award W81XWH-04-1-0280; Australia Project Grant [390130, 1009458] and Enabling Grant [614296 to APCB]; the Prostate Cancer Foundation of Australia (Project Grant [PG7] and Research infrastructure grant [to APCB]); NIH grant R01 CA092447; Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center (P30 CA68485); Cancer Research UK [C490/A10124] and supported by the UK National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre at the University of Cambridge; Competitive Research Funding of the Tampere University Hospital (9N069 and X51003); Award Number P30CA042014 from the National Cancer Institute.This is the final version of the article. It first appeared from Nature Publishing Group via http://dx.doi.org/0.1038/ncomms1097
Atlas of prostate cancer heritability in European and African-American men pinpoints tissue-specific regulation
Although genome-wide association studies have identified over 100 risk loci that explain similar to 33% of familial risk for prostate cancer (PrCa), their functional effects on risk remain largely unknown. Here we use genotype data from 59,089 men of European and African American ancestries combined with cell-type-specific epigenetic data to build a genomic atlas of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) heritability in PrCa. We find significant differences in heritability between variants in prostate-relevant epigenetic marks defined in normal versus tumour tissue as well as between tissue and cell lines. The majority of SNP heritability lies in regions marked by H3k27 acetylation in prostate adenoc7arcinoma cell line (LNCaP) or by DNaseI hypersensitive sites in cancer cell lines. We find a high degree of similarity between European and African American ancestries suggesting a similar genetic architecture from common variation underlying PrCa risk. Our findings showcase the power of integrating functional annotation with genetic data to understand the genetic basis of PrCa.Peer reviewe
Recommended from our members
Atlas of prostate cancer heritability in European and African-American men pinpoints tissue-specific regulation
Although genome-wide association studies have identified over 100 risk loci that explain ∼33% of familial risk for prostate cancer (PrCa), their functional effects on risk remain largely unknown. Here we use genotype data from 59,089 men of European and African American ancestries combined with cell-type-specific epigenetic data to build a genomic atlas of single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) heritability in PrCa. We find significant differences in heritability between variants in prostate-relevant epigenetic marks defined in normal versus tumour tissue as well as between tissue and cell lines. The majority of SNP heritability lies in regions marked by H3k27 acetylation in prostate adenoc7arcinoma cell line (LNCaP) or by DNaseI hypersensitive sites in cancer cell lines. We find a high degree of similarity between European and African American ancestries suggesting a similar genetic architecture from common variation underlying PrCa risk. Our findings showcase the power of integrating functional annotation with genetic data to understand the genetic basis of PrCa
Local Genetic Correlation Gives Insights into the Shared Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits.
A multivariate Bernoulli model to predict DNaseI hypersensitivity status from haplotype data
Computational methods to analyze large-scale genetic studies of complex human traits
Large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have produced a rich resource of genetic data over the past decade, urging the need to develop computational and statistical methods that analyze these data. This dissertation presents four statistical methods that model the correlation structure between genetic variants and its effect on GWAS summary association statistics to help understand the genetic basis of complex human traits and diseases.The first method employs the multivariate Bernoulli distribution to model haplotype data, allowing for higher-order interactions among genetic variants, and shows better accuracy in predicting DNase I hypersensitivity status.The second method partitions heritability into small regions on the genome using GWAS summary statistics data, while accounting for complex correlation structures among genetic variants, and uncovers the genetic architectures of complex human traits and diseases.Extending the second method into pairs of traits, the third method partitions genetic correlation into small genomic regions using GWAS summary statistics data, and provides insights into the shared genetic basis between pairs of traits.Finally, the fourth method dissects population-specific and shared causal genetic variants of complex traits in two continental populations, using GWAS summary statistics data obtained from samples of different ethnicities, and reveals differences in genetic architectures of two continental populations