Global Sentiments Surrounding the COVID-19 Pandemic on Twitter: Analysis of Twitter Trends.

BACKGROUND: With the World Health Organization's pandemic declaration and government-initiated actions against coronavirus disease (COVID-19), sentiments surrounding COVID-19 have evolved rapidly. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine worldwide trends of four emotions-fear, anger, sadness, and joy-and the narratives underlying those emotions during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Over 20 million social media twitter posts made during the early phases of the COVID-19 outbreak from January 28 to April 9, 2020, were collected using "wuhan," "corona," "nCov," and "covid" as search keywords. RESULTS: Public emotions shifted strongly from fear to anger over the course of the pandemic, while sadness and joy also surfaced. Findings from word clouds suggest that fears around shortages of COVID-19 tests and medical supplies became increasingly widespread discussion points. Anger shifted from xenophobia at the beginning of the pandemic to discourse around the stay-at-home notices. Sadness was highlighted by the topics of losing friends and family members, while topics related to joy included words of gratitude and good health. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, global COVID-19 sentiments have shown rapid evolutions within just the span of a few weeks. Findings suggest that emotion-driven collective issues around shared public distress experiences of the COVID-19 pandemic are developing and include large-scale social isolation and the loss of human lives. The steady rise of societal concerns indicated by negative emotions needs to be monitored and controlled by complementing regular crisis communication with strategic public health communication that aims to balance public psychological wellbeing

Temporal trends in health-related quality of life after stroke: analysis from the South London Stroke Register 1995-2011

National Institute for Health Research Programme Grant (RP-PG-0407-10184

Self-reported long-term needs after stroke.

Development of interventions to manage patients with stroke after discharge from the hospital requires estimates of need. This study estimates the prevalence of self-reported need in community-dwelling stroke survivors across the United Kingdom

Self-reported long-term needs after stroke.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Development of interventions to manage patients with stroke after discharge from the hospital requires estimates of need. This study estimates the prevalence of self-reported need in community-dwelling stroke survivors across the United Kingdom. METHODS: We conducted a survey of stroke survivors 1 to 5 years poststroke recruited through Medical Research Council General Practice Research Framework general practices and 2 population-based stroke registers. Levels and type of need were calculated with comparisons among sociodemographic groups, disability level, and cognitive status using the χ2 test or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. RESULTS: From 1251 participants, response rates were 60% (national sample) and 78% (population registers sample) with few differences in levels of reported need between the 2 samples. Over half (51%) reported no unmet needs; among the remainder, the median number of unmet needs was 3 (range, 1 to 13). Proportions reporting unmet clinical needs ranged from 15% to 59%; 54% reported an unmet need for stroke information; 52% reported reduction in or loss of work activities, significantly more from black ethnic groups (P=0.006); 18% reported a loss in income and 31% an increase in expenses with differences by age, ethnic group, and deprivation score. In multivariable analysis, ethnicity (P=0.032) and disability (P=0.014) were associated with total number of unmet needs. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple long-term clinical and social needs remain unmet long after incident stroke. Higher levels of unmet need were reported by people with disabilities, from ethnic minority groups, and from those living in the most deprived areas. Development and testing of novel methods to meet unmet needs are required.The Stroke Survivor Needs Survey is funded by The Stroke Association; C.D.A.W. acknowledges financial support from the Department of Health through the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre award to Guy's & St Thomas' National Health Services (NHS) Foundation Trust in partnership with King's College London. C.D.A.W. is an NIHR Senior Investigator. A.R.R. is funded by the Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Trust Academic Health Sciences Centre Planned Activities (AHSC PA) Scheme. The South London Stroke Register is funded by the Northern & Yorkshire NHS R&D Programme in Cardiovascular Disease and Stroke, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital Charity, Stanley Thomas Johnson Foundation, The Stroke Association, Department of Health Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership grant, and a National Institute for Health Research Programme Grant (RP-PG-0407-10184). The Oxford Vascular Study is funded by the UK Medical Research Council, the Dunhill Medical Trust, the Stroke Association, the Bupa Foundation, the NIHR, the Thames Valley Primary Care Research Partnership, and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, Oxford

Effectiveness of a mobile-based influenza-like illness surveillance system (FluMob) among health care workers: Longitudinal study

10.2196/19712JMIR mHealth and uHealth812e19712

Patient engagement with research: European population register study.

BACKGROUND: Lay involvement in implementation of research evidence into practice may include using research findings to guide individual care, as well as involvement in research processes and policy development. Little is known about the conditions required for such involvement. AIM: To assess stroke survivors' research awareness, use of research evidence in their own care and readiness to be involved in research processes. METHODS: Cross sectional survey of stroke survivors participating in population-based stroke registers in six European centres. RESULTS: The response rate was 74% (481/647). Reasons for participation in register research included responding to clinician request (56%) and to 'give something back' (19%); however, 20% were unaware that they were participating in a stroke register. Research awareness was generally low: 57% did not know the purpose of the register they had been recruited to; 73% reported not having received results from the register they took part in; 60% did not know about any research on stroke care. Few participants (7.6%) used research evidence during their consultations with a doctor. The 34% of participants who were interested in being involved in research were younger, more highly educated and already research aware. CONCLUSIONS: Across Europe, stroke survivors already participating in research appear ill informed about stroke research. Researchers, healthcare professionals and patient associations need to improve how research results are communicated to patient populations and research participants, and to raise awareness of the relationship between research evidence and increased quality of care.This paper was written on behalf of the European Implementation Score (EIS) project, funded by the EU 7th Framework Programme