Epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA expression: A potential molecular escape mechanism from regorafenib.

Regorafenib has improved the survival of patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), yet the mechanisms of inherited or acquired resistance are not well understood. A total of 50 patients with refractory mCRC were enrolled. Circulating tumor cell (CTC) enumeration was carried out at baseline, day 21 after initiation of regorafenib, and at the time of progression of disease (PD) using the CellSearch System (Veridex LLC, NJ, USA). Poly(A) mRNA was extracted from CTCs, and gene expression of epithelial and epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers was analyzed by a multiplex-PCR based DNA Chip. Patients with fewer than 3 CTCs at baseline and day 21 had a longer progression-free survival than those with 3 or more CTCs (3.3 vs 2.0 months, P = .008 and 3.3 vs 2.0 months, P = .004, respectively). Patients with fewer than 3 CTCs at baseline and day 21 had a longer overall survival (OS) than those with 3 or more CTCs (10.0 vs 4.6 months, P < .001 and 8.7 vs 3.8 months, P = .003, respectively). In multivariable analysis, CTC counts remained significantly associated with OS at baseline and day 21 (P = .019 and P = .028). Circulating tumor cell EGFR gene expression was upregulated at day 21 and/or PD in 64% of patients. Patients had significantly increased EGFR expression at PD compared to baseline (P = .041) and at day 21 and/or PD compared to baseline (P = .004). Our findings suggest that CTC count and EGFR expression could be useful markers of regorafenib efficacy and outcomes. Upregulation of CTC EGFR expression might be a molecular escape mechanism under regorafenib therapy

Non-clinical studies for oncology drug development

Non-clinical studies are necessary at each stage of the development of oncology drugs. Many experimental cancer models have been developed to investigate carcinogenesis, cancer progression, metastasis, and other aspects in cancer biology and these models turned out to be useful in the efficacy evaluation and the safety prediction of oncology drugs. While the diversity and the degree of engagement in genetic changes in the initiation of cancer cell growth and progression are widely accepted, it has become increasingly clear that the roles of host cells, tissue microenvironment, and the immune system also play important roles in cancer. Therefore, the methods used to develop oncology drugs should continuously be revised based on the advances in our understanding of cancer. In this review, we extensively summarize the effective use of those models, their advantages and disadvantages, ranges to be evaluated and limitations of the models currently used for the development and for the evaluation of oncology drugs

Revisiting Telomere Shortening in Cancer

Telomeres, the protective structures of chromosome ends are gradually shortened by each cell division, eventually leading to senescence or apoptosis. Cancer cells maintain the telomere length for unlimited growth by telomerase reactivation or a recombination-based mechanism. Recent genome-wide analyses have unveiled genetic and epigenetic alterations of the telomere maintenance machinery in cancer. While telomerase inhibition reveals that longer telomeres are more advantageous for cell survival, cancer cells often have paradoxically shorter telomeres compared with those found in the normal tissues. In this review, we summarize the latest knowledge about telomere length alterations in cancer and revisit its rationality. Finally, we discuss the potential utility of telomere length as a prognostic biomarker

Functional Subdomain in the Ankyrin Domain of Tankyrase 1 Required for Poly(ADP-Ribosyl)ation of TRF1 and Telomere Elongation

In human cells, telomere elongation by telomerase is repressed in cis by the telomeric protein TRF1. Tankyrase 1 binds TRF1 via its ankyrin domain and poly(ADP-ribosyl)ates it. Overexpression of tankyrase 1 in telomerase-positive cells releases TRF1 from telomeres, resulting in telomere elongation. The tankyrase 1 ankyrin domain is classified into five conserved subdomains, ARCs (ankyrin repeat clusters) I to V. Here, we investigated the biological significance of the ARCs. First, each ARC worked as an independent binding site for TRF1. Second, ARCs II to V recognized the N-terminal acidic domain of TRF1 whereas ARC I bound a discrete site between the homodimerization and the Myb-like domains of TRF1. Inactivation of TRF1 binding in the C-terminal ARC, ARC V, either by deletion or point mutation, significantly reduced the ability of tankyrase 1 to poly(ADP-ribosyl)ate TRF1, release TRF1 from telomeres, and elongate telomeres. In contrast, other ARCs, ARC II and/or IV, inactivated by point mutations still retained the biological function of tankyrase 1. On the other hand, ARC V per se was not sufficient for telomere elongation, suggesting a structural role for multiple ARCs. This work provides evidence that specific ARC-TRF1 interactions play roles in the essential catalytic function of tankyrase 1

Evaluation of the Interaction between Long Telomeric DNA and Macrocyclic Hexaoxazole (6OTD) Dimer of a

molecule

Involvement of 14-3-3 proteins in nuclear localization of telomerase

Maintenance of telomeres is implicated in chromosome stabilization and cell immortalization. Telomerase, which catalyzes de novo synthesis of telomeres, is activated in germ cells and most cancers. Telomerase activity is regulated by gene expression for its catalytic subunit, TERT, whereas several lines of evidence have suggested a post-translational regulation of telomerase activity. Here we identify the 14-3-3 signaling proteins as human TERT (hTERT)-binding partners. A dominant-negative 14-3-3 redistributed hTERT, which was normally predominant in the nucleus, into the cytoplasm. Consistent with this observation, hTERT-3A, a mutant that could not bind 14-3-3, was localized into the cytoplasm. Leptomycin B, an inhibitor of CRM1/exportin 1-mediated nuclear export, or disruption of a nuclear export signal (NES)-like motif located just upstream of the 14-3-3 binding site in hTERT impaired the cytoplasmic localization of hTERT. Compared with wild-type hTERT, hTERT-3A increased its association with CRM1. 14-3-3 binding was not required for telomerase activity either in vitro or in cell extracts. These observations suggest that 14-3-3 enhances nuclear localization of TERT by inhibiting the CRM1 binding to the TERT NES-like motif

Role of EMT in the DNA damage response, double-strand break repair pathway choice and its implications in cancer treatment

International audienceNumerous epithelial–mesenchymal transition (EMT) characteristics have now been demonstrated to participate in tumor development. Indeed, EMT is involved in invasion, acquisition of stem cell properties, and therapy-associated resistance of cancer cells. Together, these mechanisms offer advantages in adapting to changes in the tumor microenvironment. However, recent findings have shown that EMT-associated transcription factors (EMT-TFs) may also be involved in DNA repair. A better understanding of the coordination between the DNA repair pathways and the role played by some EMT-TFs in the DNA damage response (DDR) should pave the way for new treatments targeting tumor-specific molecular vulnerabilities, which result in selective destruction of cancer cells. Here we review recent advances, providing novel insights into the role of EMT in the DDR and repair pathways, with a particular focus on the influence of EMT on cellular sensitivity to damage, as well as the implications of these relationships for improving the efficacy of cancer treatments