Particle Swarm Optimization Artificial Intelligence technique for gene signature discovery in transcriptomic cohorts

The development of gene signatures is key for delivering personalized medicine, despite only a few signatures being available for use in the clinic for cancer patients. Gene signature discovery tends to revolve around identifying a single signature. However, it has been shown that various highly predictive signatures can be produced from the same dataset. This study assumes that the presentation of top ranked signatures will allow greater efforts in the selection of gene signatures for validation on external datasets and for their clinical translation. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) is an evolutionary algorithm often used as a search strategy and largely represented as binary PSO (BPSO) in this domain. BPSO, however, fails to produce succinct feature sets for complex optimization problems, thus affecting its overall runtime and optimization performance. Enhanced BPSO (EBPSO) was developed to overcome these shortcomings. Thus, this study will validate unique candidate gene signatures for different underlying biology from EBPSO on transcriptomics cohorts. EBPSO was consistently seen to be as accurate as BPSO with substantially smaller feature signatures and significantly faster runtimes. 100% accuracy was achieved in all but two of the selected data sets. Using clinical transcriptomics cohorts, EBPSO has demonstrated the ability to identify accurate, succinct, and significantly prognostic signatures that are unique from one another. This has been proposed as a promising alternative to overcome the issues regarding traditional single gene signature generation. Interpretation of key genes within the signatures provided biological insights into the associated functions that were well correlated to their cancer type

IHC-based subcellular quantification provides new insights into prognostic relevance of FLIP and procaspase-8 in non-small-cell lung cancer

AbstractIn this study, we developed an image analysis algorithm for quantification of two potential apoptotic biomarkers in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): FLIP and procaspase-8. Immunohistochemical expression of FLIP and procaspase-8 in 184 NSCLC tumors were assessed. Individual patient cores were segmented and classified as tumor and stroma using the Definiens Tissue Studio. Subsequently, chromogenic expression of each biomarker was measured separately in the nucleus and cytoplasm and reported as a quantitative histological score. The software package pROC was applied to define biomarker thresholds. Cox proportional hazards analysis was applied to generate hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% CI for survival. High cytoplasmic expression of tumoral (but not stromal) FLIP was associated with a 2.5-fold increased risk of death in lung adenocarcinoma patients, even when adjusted for known confounders (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.14–5.35). Neither nuclear nor cytoplasmic tumoral procaspase-8 expression was associated with overall survival in lung adenocarcinoma patients; however, there was a significant trend (P for trend=0.03) for patients with adenocarcinomas with both high cytoplasmic FLIP and high cytoplasmic procaspase-8 to have a multiplicative increased risk of death. Notably, high stromal nuclear procaspase-8 expression was associated with a reduced risk of death in lung adenocarcinoma patients (adjusted HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15–0.66). On further examination, the cells with high nuclear procaspase-8 were found to be of lymphoid origin, suggesting that the better prognosis of patients with tumors with high stromal nuclear procaspase-8 is related to immune infiltration, a known favorable prognostic factor. No significant associations were detected in analysis of lung squamous cell carcinoma patients. Our results suggest that cytoplasmic expression of FLIP in the tumor and nuclear expression of procaspase-8 in the stroma are prognostically relevant in non-small-cell adenocarcinomas but not in squamous cell carcinomas of the lung.</jats:p

A robust multiplex immunofluorescence and digital pathology workflow for the characterisation of the tumour immune microenvironment

Multiplex immunofluorescence is a powerful tool for the simultaneous detection of tissue‐based biomarkers, revolutionising traditional immunohistochemistry. The Opal methodology allows up to eight biomarkers to be measured concomitantly without cross‐reactivity, permitting identification of different cell populations within the tumour microenvironment. In this study, we aimed to validate a multiplex immunofluorescence workflow in two complementary multiplex panels and evaluate the tumour immune microenvironment in colorectal cancer formalin‐fixed paraffin‐embedded tissue. We stained colorectal cancer and tonsil samples using Opal multiplex immunofluorescence on a Leica BOND RX immunostainer. We then acquired images on an Akoya Vectra Polaris and performed multispectral unmixing using inForm. Antibody panels were validated on tissue microarray sections containing cores from six normal tissue types, using QuPath for image analysis. Comparisons between chromogenic immunohistochemistry and multiplex immunofluorescence on consecutive sections from the same tissue microarray showed significant correlation (rs > 0.9, p‐value < 0.0001), validating both panels. We identified many factors that influenced the quality of the acquired fluorescent images, including biomarker co‐expression, staining order, Opal‐antibody pairing, sample thickness, multispectral unmixing, and biomarker detection order during image analysis. Overall, we report the optimisation and validation of a multiplex immunofluorescence process, from staining to image analysis, ensuring assay robustness. Our multiplex immunofluorescence protocols permit the accurate detection of multiple immune markers in various tissue types, using a workflow that enables rapid processing of samples, above and beyond previous workflows