26 research outputs found
Ankle/brachial index to everyone.
In the last years significant attention has been paid in identifying markers of subclinical atherosclerosis or of increased cardiovascular risk.
Method
An abnormal ankle/brachial index (ABI) identifies patients affected by lower extremity peripheral arterial disease, and even more important, represents a powerful predictor of the development of future ischemic cardiovascular events.
Conclusions
In our opinion, ABI is a cardiovascular risk prediction tool with very desirable properties that might become a routine measurement in clinical practice
Abdominal aortic aneurysm in patients affected by intermittent claudication: prevalence and clinical predictors
BACKGROUND: Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a frequent cause of death among elderly. Patients affected by lower extremity peripheral arterial disease (LE-PAD) seem to be particularly at high risk for AAA. We aimed this study at assessing the prevalence and the clinical predictors of the presence of AAA in a homogeneous cohort of LE-PAD patients affected by intermittent claudication. METHODS: We performed an abdominal ultrasound in 213 consecutive patients with documented LE-PAD (ankle/brachial index ≤ 0.90) attending our outpatient clinic for intermittent claudication. For each patient we registered cardiovascular risk factors and comorbidities, and measured neutrophil count. RESULTS: The ultrasound was inconclusive in 3 patients (1.4%), thus 210 patients (169 males, 41 females, mean age 65.9 ± 9.8 yr) entered the study. Overall, AAA was present in 19 patients (9.0%), with a not significant higher prevalence in men than in women (10.1% vs 4.9%, p = 0.300). Patients with AAA were older (71.2 ± 7.0 vs 65.4 ± 9.9 years, p = 0.015), were more likely to have hypertension (94.7% vs 71.2%, p = 0.027), and greater neutrophil count (5.5 [4.5 - 6.2] vs 4.1 [3.2 - 5.5] x 10(3)/μL, p = 0.010). Importantly, the c-statistic for neutrophil count (0.73, 95% CI 0.60 - 0.86, p = 0.010) was higher than that for age (0.67, CI 0.56-0.78, p = 0.017). The prevalence of AAA in claudicant patients with a neutrophil count ≥ 5.1 x 10(3)/μL (cut-off identified at ROC analysis) was as high as 29.0%. CONCLUSIONS: Prevalence of AAA in claudicant patients is much higher than that reported in the general population. Ultrasound screening should be considered in these patients, especially in those with an elevated neutrophil count
Endovascular treatment of carotid artery stenosis: evidences from randomized controlled trials and actual indications
Atherosclerotic stenosis of common and internal carotid arteries is a well-recognized risk factor for ischemic stroke, and revascularization has been proven to be the main tool of prevention, particularly for patients with stenosis- related symptoms. While for many years surgical carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been considered the gold-standard strategy to restore vascular patency, recently the endovascular treatment through percutaneous angioplasty and stent implantation (CAS) has become a valid alternative. In the last years, interesting data about the comparison of these strategies have emerged. CAS seems to cause more peri-procedural strokes, but may also avoid many adverse events related to surgery and general anaesthesia, including peri-procedural myocardial infarction. For these reasons, it was initially considered a second-choice strategy to be adopted in patients for whom surgery was contraindicated. However, more recent trials have shown that CAS might be considered an effective alternative to CEA. Moreover, the rapid evolution of CAS technique and materials suggests its potential to improve outcome and possible superiority compared to CEA in the next future. Purpose of this review is to discuss the most recent clinical evidences concerning the treatment of carotid artery stenosis, with a special focus on the endovascular treatment
Hydroxytyrosol Protects against Oxidative DNA Damage in Human Breast Cells
Over recent years, several studies have related olive oil ingestion to a low incidence of several diseases, including breast cancer. Hydroxytyrosol and tyrosol are two of the major phenols present in virgin olive oils. Despite the fact that they have been linked to cancer prevention, there is no evidence that clarifies their effect in human breast tumor and non-tumor cells. In the present work, we present hydroxytyrosol and tyrosol’s effects in human breast cell lines. Our results show that hydroxytyrosol acts as a more efficient free radical scavenger than tyrosol, but both fail to affect cell proliferation rates, cell cycle profile or cell apoptosis in human mammary epithelial cells (MCF10A) or breast cancer cells (MDA-MB-231 and MCF7). We found that hydroxytyrosol decreases the intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) level in MCF10A cells but not in MCF7 or MDA-MB-231 cells while very high amounts of tyrosol is needed to decrease the ROS level in MCF10A cells. Interestingly, hydroxytyrosol prevents oxidative DNA damage in the three breast cell lines. Therefore, our data suggest that simple phenol hydroxytyrosol could contribute to a lower incidence of breast cancer in populations that consume virgin olive oil due to its antioxidant activity and its protection against oxidative DNA damage in mammary cells
Relationship between CHA2DS2-VASc score, coronary artery disease severity, residual platelet reactivity and long-term clinical outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome
BACKGROUND: The CHA2DS2-VASc score predicts stroke risk in patients with atrial fibrillation, but recently has been reported to have a prognostic role even in patients with ACS. We sought to assess the ability of the CHA2DS2-VASc score to predict the severity of coronary artery disease, high residual platelet reactivity and long-term outcomes in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
METHODS: Overall, 1729 consecutive patients with ACS undergoing invasive management were included in this prospective registry. We assessed platelet reactivity via light transmittance aggregometry after clopidogrel loading. Patients were divided according to the CHA2DS2-VASc score: group A\u202f=\u202f0, B\u202f=\u202f1, C\u202f=\u202f2, D\u202f=\u202f3, E\u202f=\u202f4 and F\u202f 65\u202f5.
RESULTS: Patients with higher CHA2DS2-VASc score were more likely to have a higher rate of multivessel CAD (37%, 47%, 55%, 62%, 67 and 75% in Group A, B, C, D, E and F; p\u202f<\u202f0.001); moreover, CHA2DS2-VASc score correlated linearly with residual platelet reactivity (R\u202f=\u202f0.77; p\u202f<\u202f0.001). At long-term follow-up, estimated adverse event rates (MACCE: cardiac death, MI, stroke or any urgent coronary revascularization) were 3%, 8%, 10%, 14%, 19% and 24% in group A, B, C, D, E and F; p\u202f<\u202f0.001. Multivariable analysis demonstrated CHA2DS2-VASc to be an independent predictor of severity of coronary artery disease, of high residual platelet reactivity and of MACCE.
CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with ACS, CHA2DS2-VASc score correlated with coronary disease severity and residual platelet reactivity, and therefore it predicted the risk of long-term adverse events
Not-high before-treatment platelet reactivity in patients with STEMI: prevalence, clinical characteristics, response to therapy and outcomes
Platelet reactivity (PR) has been indicated as a pathophysiological key element for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI) development. Patients with not-high before-treatment platelet reactivity (NHPR) have been poorly studied so far. The aim of this study is to investigate the prevalence, clinical characteristics, response to therapy and outcomes of baseline prior to treatment NHPR among patients with STEMI undergoing primary PCI. We analyzed the data from 358 STEMI patients with assessment of PR by VerifyNow before P2Y12 inhibitor loading dose (LD). Blood samples were obtained at baseline, and after 1 hour, 2 hours, 4–6 hours and 8–12 hours after LD. High platelet reactivity (HPR) was defined as Platelet Reactivity Unit values ≥208, while patients with values <208 at baseline were defined as having NHPR. Overall, 20% patients had NHPR. Age and male gender both resulted independent predictors of NHPR, even after propensity score adjustment. The percentage of inhibition of PR after ticagrelor or prasugrel LD was similar between HPR and NHPR patients at each time point. However, patients with HPR showed worse in-hospital clinical outcomes, and the composite adverse outcome endpoint of death, reinfarction, stroke, acute kidney injury or heart failure was significantly higher (10.0% vs 1.4%; p = .017) as compared with the NHPR group. In conclusion, a significant proportion of patients presenting with STEMI has a baseline NHPR that is associated with better in-hospital outcomes as compared with patients with HPR. Further studies are needed to better elucidate the potential therapeutic implications of NHPR in terms of secondary prevention