Wave-Breaking Turbulence in the Ocean Surface Layer

AbstractObservations of winds, waves, and turbulence at the ocean surface are compared with several analytic formulations and a numerical model for the input of turbulent kinetic energy by wave breaking and the subsequent dissipation. The observations are generally consistent with all of the formulations, although some differences are notable at winds greater than 15 m s−1. The depth dependence of the turbulent dissipation rate beneath the waves is fit to a decay scale, which is sensitive to the choice of vertical reference frame. In the surface-following reference frame, the strongest turbulence is isolated within a shallow region of depths much less than one significant wave height. In a fixed reference frame, the strong turbulence penetrates to depths that are at least half of the significant wave height. This occurs because the turbulence of individual breakers persists longer than the dominant period of the waves and thus the strong surface turbulence is carried from crest to trough with the wave orbital motion.</jats:p

Wave-Breaking Turbulence in the Ocean Surface Layer

Observations of winds, waves, and turbulence at the ocean surface are compared with several analytic formulations and a numerical model for the input of turbulent kinetic energy by wave breaking and the subsequent dissipation. The observations are generally consistent with all of the formulations, although some differences are notable at winds greater than 15 m s⁻¹. The depth dependence of the turbulent dissipation rate beneath the waves is fit to a decay scale, which is sensitive to the choice of vertical reference frame. In the surface-following reference frame, the strongest turbulence is isolated within a shallow region of depths much less than one significant wave height. In a fixed reference frame, the strong turbulence penetrates to depths that are at least half of the significant wave height. This occurs because the turbulence of individual breakers persists longer than the dominant period of the waves and thus the strong surface turbulence is carried from crest to trough with the wave orbital motion.This is the publisher’s final pdf. The published article is copyrighted by the American Meteorological Society and can be found at: https://www.ametsoc.org/ams/index.cfm/publications/journals/journal-of-physical-oceanography/The SWIFT wave, wind, and turbulence data are available online (at www.apl.uw.edu/swift) by serial number. The waverider spectra are available as station 166 from the Coastal Data Information Program (CDIP) at the Scripps Institution of Oceanography or the National Data Buoy Center (NDBC) as station 46246.KEYWORDS: Wave breaking, Waves, oceanic, Atmosphere-ocean interaction, Turbulence, Wind waves, Circulation/ Dynamics, Atm/Ocean Structure/ Phenomena, Sea stat

Systemic Delivery of an Adjuvant CXCR4-CXCL12 Signaling Inhibitor Encapsulated in Synthetic Protein Nanoparticles for Glioma Immunotherapy

Glioblastoma (GBM) is an aggressive primary brain cancer, with a 5 year survival of ∼5%. Challenges that hamper GBM therapeutic efficacy include (i) tumor heterogeneity, (ii) treatment resistance, (iii) immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), and (iv) the blood-brain barrier (BBB). The C-X-C motif chemokine ligand-12/C-X-C motif chemokine receptor-4 (CXCL12/CXCR4) signaling pathway is activated in GBM and is associated with tumor progression. Although the CXCR4 antagonist (AMD3100) has been proposed as an attractive anti-GBM therapeutic target, it has poor pharmacokinetic properties, and unfavorable bioavailability has hampered its clinical implementation. Thus, we developed synthetic protein nanoparticles (SPNPs) coated with the transcytotic peptide iRGD (AMD3100-SPNPs) to target the CXCL2/CXCR4 pathway in GBM via systemic delivery. We showed that AMD3100-SPNPs block CXCL12/CXCR4 signaling in three mouse and human GBM cell cultures in vitro and in a GBM mouse model in vivo. This results in (i) inhibition of GBM proliferation, (ii) reduced infiltration of CXCR4+ monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells (M-MDSCs) into the TME, (iii) restoration of BBB integrity, and (iv) induction of immunogenic cell death (ICD), sensitizing the tumor to radiotherapy and leading to anti-GBM immunity. Additionally, we showed that combining AMD3100-SPNPs with radiation led to long-term survival, with ∼60% of GBM tumor-bearing mice remaining tumor free after rechallenging with a second GBM in the contralateral hemisphere. This was due to a sustained anti-GBM immunological memory response that prevented tumor recurrence without additional treatment. In view of the potent ICD induction and reprogrammed tumor microenvironment, this SPNP-mediated strategy has a significant clinical translation applicability.Fil: Alghamri, Mahmoud S.. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Banerjee, Kaushik. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Mujeeb, Anzar A.. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Mauser, Ava. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Taher, Ayman. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Thalla, Rohit. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: McClellan, Brandon L.. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Varela, Maria L.. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Stamatovic, Svetlana M.. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Martinez Revollar, Gabriela. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Andjelkovic, Anuska V.. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Gregory, Jason V.. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Kadiyala, Padma. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Calinescu, Alexandra. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Jiménez, Jennifer A.. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Apfelbaum, April A.. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Lawlor, Elizabeth R.. University of Washington; Estados UnidosFil: Carney, Stephen. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Comba, Andrea. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados Unidos. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas; ArgentinaFil: Faisal, Syed Mohd. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Barissi, Marcus. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Edwards, Marta B.. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Appelman, Henry. University Of Michigan Medical School; Estados UnidosFil: Sun, Yilun. Case Western Reserve University; Estados UnidosFil: Gan, Jingyao. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Ackermann, Rose. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Schwendeman, Anna. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Candolfi, Marianela. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Oficina de Coordinación Administrativa Houssay. Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas. Universidad de Buenos Aires. Facultad de Medicina. Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas; ArgentinaFil: Olin, Michael R.. University of Minnesota; Estados UnidosFil: Lahann, Joerg. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Lowenstein, Pedro R.. University of Michigan; Estados UnidosFil: Castro, Maria G.. University of Michigan; Estados Unido

31st Annual Meeting and Associated Programs of the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC 2016) : part two

Background The immunological escape of tumors represents one of the main ob- stacles to the treatment of malignancies. The blockade of PD-1 or CTLA-4 receptors represented a milestone in the history of immunotherapy. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors seem to be effective in specific cohorts of patients. It has been proposed that their efficacy relies on the presence of an immunological response. Thus, we hypothesized that disruption of the PD-L1/PD-1 axis would synergize with our oncolytic vaccine platform PeptiCRAd. Methods We used murine B16OVA in vivo tumor models and flow cytometry analysis to investigate the immunological background. Results First, we found that high-burden B16OVA tumors were refractory to combination immunotherapy. However, with a more aggressive schedule, tumors with a lower burden were more susceptible to the combination of PeptiCRAd and PD-L1 blockade. The therapy signifi- cantly increased the median survival of mice (Fig. 7). Interestingly, the reduced growth of contralaterally injected B16F10 cells sug- gested the presence of a long lasting immunological memory also against non-targeted antigens. Concerning the functional state of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), we found that all the immune therapies would enhance the percentage of activated (PD-1pos TIM- 3neg) T lymphocytes and reduce the amount of exhausted (PD-1pos TIM-3pos) cells compared to placebo. As expected, we found that PeptiCRAd monotherapy could increase the number of antigen spe- cific CD8+ T cells compared to other treatments. However, only the combination with PD-L1 blockade could significantly increase the ra- tio between activated and exhausted pentamer positive cells (p= 0.0058), suggesting that by disrupting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis we could decrease the amount of dysfunctional antigen specific T cells. We ob- served that the anatomical location deeply influenced the state of CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes. In fact, TIM-3 expression was in- creased by 2 fold on TILs compared to splenic and lymphoid T cells. In the CD8+ compartment, the expression of PD-1 on the surface seemed to be restricted to the tumor micro-environment, while CD4 + T cells had a high expression of PD-1 also in lymphoid organs. Interestingly, we found that the levels of PD-1 were significantly higher on CD8+ T cells than on CD4+ T cells into the tumor micro- environment (p < 0.0001). Conclusions In conclusion, we demonstrated that the efficacy of immune check- point inhibitors might be strongly enhanced by their combination with cancer vaccines. PeptiCRAd was able to increase the number of antigen-specific T cells and PD-L1 blockade prevented their exhaus- tion, resulting in long-lasting immunological memory and increased median survival