Subtype-specific statistical causalities in parkinsonian tremor

Tremor is one of the cardinal symptoms of Parkinson's disease. Up to now, however, its pathophysiology remains poorly understood. Previously, oscillatory coupling at tremor frequency between the subthalamic nucleus und affected muscles was shown. In these studies, however, causality of coupling could not be demonstrated. Thus, we analyzed the statistical causality between intraoperatively recorded local field potentials in the subthalamic area and affected arm muscles during tremor episodes, using squared partial directed coherence, a recently developed causality measure. The analysis identified differential statistical causality patterns for Parkinson's disease patients of the akinetic-rigid subtype during tremor episodes (n=6) versus patients of the tremor-dominant subtype (n=8): for the akinetic-rigid Parkinson's disease patients significantly more cases of the subthalamic region were found to be statistically causal for electromyographic-tremor activity, a result in accordance with the standard basal ganglia model. In contrast, for the tremor-dominant patients, significantly more instances of electromyographic tremor activity turned out to be causal for activity of the subthalamic region. Furthermore, the clinical effective stimulation site coincided with the location of most input causalities from the periphery in seven out of eight tremor-dominant patients. The data suggest that, although tremor activity in tremor-dominant and akinetic-rigid Parkinson's disease patients was clinically similar, statistical causality between tremor electromyogram (EMG) and the subthalamic nucleus was fundamentally different. Therefore, we hypothesize different pathophysiological mechanisms to underlie the generation of tremor in the two subtypes of Parkinson's disease

Deep brain stimulation in the Nucleus ventralis intermedius in patients with essential tremor: Habituation of tremor suppression

In patients with essential tremor (ET) already treated with chronic deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the nucleus ventralis intermedius (VIM) we investigated whether optimization of stimulation parameters could improve clinical tremor suppression, and whether this putative effect could be sustained over time. Twenty-three ET patients with VIM-DBS participated in the prospective study. All electrode contacts were tested systematically and stimulation parameters were optimized over the course of 2 days. Clinical tremor rating scale (TRS) was videotaped before, directly after the optimization and at a 10 weeks follow-up and evaluated blindly and independently by two clinicians. For stimulation effect optimization we increased the number of active contacts whereas the total charge applied to the tissue was kept constant. TRS hemi-body scores decreased significantly after optimization. At the 10 weeks follow-up, however, the improvement had faded and was no longer significant. The activities of daily living (ADL) remained significantly improved. Systematic optimization of VIM-DBS parameters in ET patients leads to a short term improvement which habituates over time. Our results provide further evidence for a tolerance effect in chronic VIM stimulation thereby suggesting that frequently alternating stimulation protocols should be tested in future studies of ET patients treated with VIM-DBS

Deep brain stimulation of the ventral intermediate nucleus in patients with essential tremor: stimulation below intercommissural line is more efficient but equally effective as stimulation above

The posterior subthalamic area (PSA), ventral to the intercommissural line (ICL) and the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM), has been suggested as a promising target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in patients suffering from essential tremor (ET). In this study the clinical benefit of VIM and PSA DBS on postural tremor suppression was systematically evaluated in a two step approach with a 3D ultrasound kinematic analysis tool.We defined the exact position of 40 VIM-DBS-electrodes from 21 ET patients. In a first experiment with a subgroup of electrodes we subsequently activated a thalamic and a contact below ICL (sub-ICL) with equal parameter settings for within subject comparison. In a second step, we divided all electrodes into two groups, i.e. one group with activated thalamic and the other group with activated contacts below ICL and performed a group comparison under patients' individual stimulation parameters. Here, the corrected amplitude required for tremor suppression was analyzed separately for both groups.Within subject comparison with equal parameter settings revealed a significant improvement of sub-ICL compared to thalamic stimulation. In contrast, group comparison under patients' individual stimulation did not show any significant difference in tremor suppression between VIM and PSA DBS. Although higher corrected stimulation amplitude was needed in the thalamic group this difference was not significant.The data suggest that sub-ICL stimulation may be more efficient compared to thalamic stimulation but equally effective when patients' individual stimulation parameters are used