12 research outputs found

    Diagnostic Utility of Temporal Muscle Thickness as a Monitoring Tool for Muscle Wasting in Neurocritical Care

    Get PDF
    Temporalis muscle (TM) atrophy has emerged as a potential biomarker for muscle wasting. However, its diagnostic utility as a monitoring tool in intensive care remains uncertain. Hence, the objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of sequential ultrasound- and computed tomography (CT)-based measurements of TM thickness (TMT). With a prospective observational design, we included 40 patients without preexisting sarcopenia admitted to a neurointensive care unit. TMT measurements, performed upon admission and serially every 3–4 days, were correlated with rectus femoris muscle thickness (RFT) ultrasound measurements. Interrater reliability was assessed by Bland Altmann plots and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Analysis of variance was performed in subgroups to evaluate differences in the standard error of measurement (SEM). RFT decline was paralleled by ultrasound- as well as CT-based TMT measurements (TMT to RFT: r = 0.746, p < 0.001; CT-based TMT to ultrasound-based RFT: r = 0.609, p < 0.001). ICC was 0.80 [95% CI 0.74, 0.84] for ultrasound-based assessment and 0.90 [95% CI 0.88, 0.92] for CT-based TMT measurements. Analysis of variance for BMI, Heckmatt score, fluid balance, and agitation showed no evidence of measurement errors in these subgroups. This study demonstrates the clinical feasibility and utility of ultrasound- and CT-based TMT measurements for the assessment of muscle wasting

    COVID-19 and Intracranial Hemorrhage: A Multicenter Case Series, Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis

    Get PDF
    Introduction: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) profoundly impacts hemostasis and microvasculature. In the light of the dilemma between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, in the present paper, we systematically investigate the prevalence, mortality, radiological subtypes, and clinical characteristics of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we performed a systematic review of the literature by screening the PubMed database and included patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and concomitant ICH. We performed a pooled analysis, including a prospectively collected cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients with ICH, as part of the PANDEMIC registry (Pooled Analysis of Neurologic Disorders Manifesting in Intensive Care of COVID-19). Results: Our literature review revealed a total of 217 citations. After the selection process, 79 studies and a total of 477 patients were included. The median age was 58.8 years. A total of 23.3% of patients experienced the critical stage of COVID-19, 62.7% of patients were on anticoagulation and 27.5% of the patients received ECMO. The prevalence of ICH was at 0.85% and the mortality at 52.18%, respectively. Conclusion: ICH in COVID-19 patients is rare, but it has a very poor prognosis. Different subtypes of ICH seen in COVID-19, support the assumption of heterogeneous and multifaceted pathomechanisms contributing to ICH in COVID-19. Further clinical and pathophysiological investigations are warranted to resolve the conflict between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in the future

    Risk factors and outcomes after interruption of sedation in subarachnoid hemorrhage (ROUTINE-SAH)—a retrospective cohort study

    No full text
    IntroductionAneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH) often necessitates prolonged sedation to manage elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) and to prevent secondary brain injury. Optimal timing and biomarkers for predicting adverse events (AEs) during interruption of sedation (IS) after prolonged sedation are not well established. To guide sedation management in aSAH, we aimed to explore the frequency, risk factors, and outcomes of IS in aSAH.MethodsIn a retrospective cohort study, a total of 148 patients with aSAH from January 2015 to April 2020 were screened. In total, 30 patients accounting for 42 IS were included in the analysis. Adverse events (AEs) during IS were used as core outcome measures and were categorized into neurological and non-neurological AEs. Baseline characteristics, clinical parameters before IS, AEs, and functional outcomes were collected using health records. Statistical analysis used generalized linear mixed-effects models with regularization to identify candidate predictors with subsequent bootstrapping to test model stability. As an exploratory analysis, multivariate linear and logistic regression was used to analyze the association between IS and intensive care unit length of stay, duration of mechanical ventilation, and functional outcomes.ResultsThe mean age was 56.9 (SD 14.8) years, and a majority of the patients presented with poor-grade SAH (16/30, 53.3%). Neurological and non-neurological AEs occurred in 60.0% (18/30) of the patients. Timing, number of IS attempts, ICP burden, craniectomy status, level of consciousness, heart rate, cerebral perfusion pressure, oxygen saturation, fraction of inspired oxygen, and temperature were selected as candidate predictors. Through bootstrapping, elapsed time since disease onset (OR 0.85, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.75–0.97), ICP burden (OR 1.24, 95% CI 1.02–1.52), craniectomy (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48–0.69), and oxygen saturation (OR, 0.80 0.72–0.89) were revealed as relevant biomarkers for neurological AEs, while none of the pre-selected predictors was robustly associated with non-neurological AEs.ConclusionIn aSAH, complications during the definite withdrawal of sedation are frequent but can potentially be predicted using clinical parameters available at the bedside. Prospective multicenter studies are essential to validate these results and further investigate the impact of IS complications

    Fit for Service: Preparing Residents for Neurointensive Care with Entrustable Professional Activities: A Delphi Study.

    No full text
    BACKGROUND Although the relevance of neurointensive medicine and high-quality training of corresponding physicians is increasingly recognized, there is high heterogeneity in the nature, duration, and quality of neurointensive care curricula around the world. Thus, we aimed to identify, define, and establish validity evidence for entrustable professional activities (EPAs) for postgraduate training in neurointensive care to determine trainees' readiness for being on-call. METHODS After defining EPAs through an iterative process by an expert group, we used a modified Delphi approach with a single-center development process followed by a national consensus and a single-center validation step. EPAs were evaluated by using the EQual rubric (Queen's EPA Quality Rubric). Interrater reliability was measured with Krippendorff's α. RESULTS The expert group defined seven preliminary EPAs for neurointensive care. In two consecutive Delphi rounds, EPAs were adapted, and consensus was reached for level of entrustment and time of expiration. Ultimately, EPAs reached a high EQual score of 4.5 of 5 and above. Interrater reliability for the EQual scoring was 0.8. CONCLUSIONS Using a multistep Delphi process, we defined and established validity evidence for seven EPAs for neurointensive medicine with a high degree of consensus to objectively describe readiness for on-call duty in neurointensive care. This operationalization of pivotal clinical tasks may help to better train clinical residents in neurointensive care across sites and health care systems and has the potential to serve as a blueprint for training in general intensive care medicine. It also represents a starting point for further research and development of medical curricula

    Phenobarbital in super‐refractory status epilepticus (PIRATE): A retrospective, multicenter analysis

    Get PDF
    Objective Super-refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) is an enduring or recurring SE after 24 h or more of general anesthesia. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of phenobarbital (PB) for the treatment of SRSE. Methods This retrospective, multicenter study included neurointensive care unit (NICU) patients with SRSE treated with PB between September 2015 and September 2020 from six participating centers of the Initiative of German NeuroIntensive Trial Engagement (IGNITE) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of PB treatment for SRSE. The primary outcome measure was seizure termination. In addition, we evaluated maximum reached serum levels, treatment duration, and clinical complications using a multivariate generalized linear model. Results Ninety-one patients were included (45.1% female). Seizure termination was achieved in 54 patients (59.3%). Increasing serum levels of PB were associated with successful seizure control (per ÎŒg/mL: adjusted odds ratio [adj.OR] = 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0–1.2, p < .01). The median length of treatment in the NICU was 33.7 [23.2–56.6] days across groups. Clinical complications occurred in 89% (n = 81) of patients and included ICU-acquired infections, hypotension requiring catecholamine therapy, and anaphylactic shock. There was no association between clinical complications and treatment outcome or in-hospital mortality. The overall average modified Rankin scale (mRS) at discharge from the NICU was 5 ± 1. Six patients (6.6%) reached mRS ≀3, of whom five were successfully treated with PB. In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in patients in whom seizure control could not be achieved. Significance We observed a high rate in attainment of seizure control in patients treated with PB. Success of treatment correlated with higher dosing and serum levels. However, as one would expect in a cohort of critically ill patients with prolonged NICU treatment, the rate of favorable clinical outcome at discharge from the NICU remained extremely low. Further prospective studies evaluating long-term clinical outcome of PB treatment as well as an earlier use of PB at higher doses would be of value

    Bispecific antibodies enable synthetic agonistic receptor-transduced T cells for tumor immunotherapy

    Full text link
    PURPOSE: Genetically engineered T cells are powerful anticancer treatments but are limited by safety and specificity issues. We herein describe an MHC-unrestricted modular platform combining autologous T cells, transduced with a targetable synthetic agonistic receptor (SAR), with bispecific antibodies (BiAb) that specifically recruit and activate T cells for tumor killing. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: BiAbs of different formats were generated by recombinant expression. T cells were retrovirally transduced with SARs. T-cell activation, proliferation, differentiation, and T-cell-induced lysis were characterized in three murine and human tumor models in vitro and in vivo. RESULTS: Murine T cells transduced with SAR composed of an extracellular domain EGFRvIII fused to CD28 and CD3ζ signaling domains could be specifically recruited toward murine tumor cells expressing EpCAM by anti-EGFRvIII × anti-EpCAM BiAb. BiAb induced selective antigen-dependent activation, proliferation of SAR T cells, and redirected tumor cell lysis. Selectivity was dependent on the monovalency of the antibody for EGFRvIII. We identified FAS ligand as a major mediator of killing utilized by the T cells. Similarly, human SAR T cells could be specifically redirected toward mesothelin-expressing human pancreatic cancer cells. In vivo, treatment with SAR T cells and BiAb mediated antitumoral activity in three human pancreatic cancer cell xenograft models. Importantly, SAR activity, unlike CAR activity, was reversible in vitro and in vivo. CONCLUSIONS: We describe a novel ACT platform with antitumor activity in murine and human tumor models with a distinct mode of action that combines adoptive T-cell therapy with bispecific antibodies

    COVID-19 and intracranial hemorrhage: a multicenter case series, systematic review and pooled analysis

    No full text
    Introduction: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV2) profoundly impacts hemostasis and microvasculature. In the light of the dilemma between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications, in the present paper, we systematically investigate the prevalence, mortality, radiological subtypes, and clinical characteristics of intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) in coronavirus disease (COVID-19) patients. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, we performed a systematic review of the literature by screening the PubMed database and included patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and concomitant ICH. We performed a pooled analysis, including a prospectively collected cohort of critically ill COVID-19 patients with ICH, as part of the PANDEMIC registry (Pooled Analysis of Neurologic Disorders Manifesting in Intensive Care of COVID-19). Results: Our literature review revealed a total of 217 citations. After the selection process, 79 studies and a total of 477 patients were included. The median age was 58.8 years. A total of 23.3% of patients experienced the critical stage of COVID-19, 62.7% of patients were on anticoagulation and 27.5% of the patients received ECMO. The prevalence of ICH was at 0.85% and the mortality at 52.18%, respectively. Conclusion: ICH in COVID-19 patients is rare, but it has a very poor prognosis. Different subtypes of ICH seen in COVID-19, support the assumption of heterogeneous and multifaceted pathomechanisms contributing to ICH in COVID-19. Further clinical and pathophysiological investigations are warranted to resolve the conflict between thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications in the future
    corecore