Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the standard of care for patients with lysosomal storage diseases : a survey of healthcare professionals in the Fabry, Gaucher, and Hunter Outcome Survey registries

the needs of their healthcare providers were explored using a 12-question survey. Overall, 80/91 respondents (88%) indicated that the pandemic had negatively affected standards of care. With increased reliance on tele-medicine, the respondents highlighted the need for a personalized approach to care, direct and frequent communication with patients, and greater involvement of patients and caregivers

Development and validation of Gaucher disease type 1 (GD1)-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for clinical monitoring and for clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: Disease-specific patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are fundamental to understanding the impact on, and expectations of, patients with genetic disorders, and can facilitate constructive and educated conversations about treatments and outcomes. However, generic PROMs may fail to capture disease-specific concerns. Here we report the development and validation of a Gaucher disease (GD)-specific PROM for patients with type 1 Gaucher disease (GD1) a lysosomal storage disorder characterized by hepatosplenomegaly, thrombocytopenia, anemia, bruising, bone disease, and fatigue. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The questionnaire was initially developed with input from 85 patients or parents of patients with GD1 or GD3 in Israel. Owing to few participating patients with GD3, content validity was assessed for patients with GD1 only. Content validity of the revised questionnaire was assessed in 33 patients in the US, France, and Israel according to US Food and Drug Administration standards, with input from a panel of six GD experts and one patient advocate representative. Concept elicitation interviews explored patient experience of symptoms and treatments, and a cognitive debriefing exercise explored patients' understanding and relevance of instructions, items, response scales, and recall period. Two versions of the questionnaire were subsequently developed: a 24-item version for routine monitoring in clinical practice (rmGD1-PROM), and a 17-item version for use in clinical trials (ctGD1-PROM). Psychometric validation of the ctGD1-PROM was assessed in 46 adult patients with GD1 and re-administered two weeks later to examine test-retest reliability. Findings from the psychometric validation study revealed excellent internal consistency and strong evidence of convergent validity of the ctGD1-PROM based on correlations with the 36-item Short Form Health Survey. Most items were found to show moderate, good, or excellent test-retest reliability. CONCLUSIONS: Development of the ctGD1-PROM represents an important step forward for researchers measuring the impact of GD and its respective treatment

Twenty years of the Fabry Outcome Survey (FOS) : insights, achievements, and lessons learned from a global patient registry

Background: Patient registries provide long-term, real-world evidence that aids the understanding of the natural history and progression of disease, and the efects of treatment on large patient populations with rare diseases. The year 2021 marks the 20th anniversary of the Fabry Outcome Survey (FOS), an international, multicenter, observational registry (NCT03289065). The primary aims of FOS are to broaden the understanding of Fabry disease (FD), an X-linked lysosomal storage disorder, and to improve the clinical management of afected patients. Here, we review the history of FOS and the analyses and publications disseminated from the registry, and we discuss the contributions FOS stud‑ ies have made in understanding FD. Results: FOS was initiated in April 2001 and, as of January 2021, 4484 patients with a confrmed diagnosis and patient informed consent have been enrolled from 144 centers across 26 countries. Data from FOS have been pub‑ lished in nearly 60 manuscripts on a wide variety of topics relevant to FD. Analyses of FOS data have investigated the long-term efectiveness and safety of enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with agalsidase alfa and its efects on morbidity and mortality, as well as the benefts of prompt and early treatment with agalsidase alfa on the progression of cardiomyopathy and the decline in renal function associated with FD. Based on analyses of FOS data, ERT with agal‑ sidase alfa has also been shown to improve additional signs and symptoms of FD experienced by patients. FOS data analyses have provided a better understanding of the natural history of FD and the specifc populations of women, children, and the elderly, and have provided practical tools for the study of FD. FOS has also provided methodology and criteria for assessing disease severity which contributed to the continuous development of medical practice in FD and has largely improved our understanding of the challenges and needs of long-term data collection in rare diseases, aiding in future rare disease real-world evidence studies. Conclusion: FOS over the last 20 years has substantially increased the scientifc knowledge around improved patient management of FD and continues to expand our understanding of this rare disease

Evaluating enzyme replacement therapies for Anderson-Fabry disease: commentary on a recent report

Abstract Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD) is a rare lysosomal storage disorder. Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) are preferred as the highest category of evidence, but limited availability of robust evidence in rare diseases may necessitate the use of less rigorous evidence. An analysis of cohort studies of enzyme replacement therapies for AFD published in 2017 by El Dib and coworkers made treatment recommendations that contradict previously published findings from RCTs and a systematic Cochrane review. Our commentary outlines concerns regarding selection criteria and statistical methods with their analysis

Evaluating enzyme replacement therapies for Anderson-Fabry disease : commentary on a recent report

Anderson-Fabry disease (AFD) is a rare lysosomal storage disorder. Randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) are preferred as the highest category of evidence, but limited availability of robust evidence in rare diseases may necessitate the use of less rigorous evidence. An analysis of cohort studies of enzyme replacement therapies for AFD published in 2017 by El Dib and coworkers made treatment recommendations that contradict previously published findings from RCTs and a systematic Cochrane review. Our commentary outlines concerns regarding selection criteria and statistical methods with their analysis

A 15-Year Perspective of the Fabry Outcome Survey

The Fabry Outcome Survey (FOS) is an international long-term observational registry sponsored by Shire for patients diagnosed with Fabry disease who are receiving or are candidates for therapy with agalsidase alfa (agalα). Established in 2001, FOS provides long-term data on agalα safety/efficacy and collects data on the natural history of Fabry disease, with the aim of improving clinical management. The FOS publications have helped establish prognostic and severity scores, defined the incidence of specific disease variants and implications for clinical management, described clinical manifestations in special populations, confirmed the high prevalence of cardiac morbidity, and demonstrated correlations between ocular changes and Fabry disease severity. These FOS data represent a rich resource with utility not only for description of natural history/therapeutic effects but also for exploratory hypothesis testing and generation of tools for diagnosis/management, with the potential to improve future patient outcomes

Twelve Years of the Gaucher Outcomes Survey (GOS): Insights, Achievements, and Lessons Learned from a Global Patient Registry.

Peer reviewed: TrueAcknowledgements: The authors would like to thank Zoya Panahloo (previously of Takeda, Zug, Switzerland) and Dalia Jazukeviciene (Takeda, Zurich, Switzerland) for their contributions to the operation of the Gaucher Outcome Survey, and to Aidan Gill (previously of Takeda, Zurich, Switzerland) for his contribution to the conceptualization, methodology, and interpretation of data for the manuscript. Under the direction of the authors, Lindsay Napier and Vardit Dror, employees of Excel Scientific Solutions, provided writing assistance for this publication. Editorial assistance in formatting, proofreading, copy editing, and fact-checking was also provided by Excel Scientific Solutions.Publication status: PublishedFunder: Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG. Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc.Background: Long-term patient registries are important for evaluating treatment outcomes in patients with rare diseases, and can provide insights into natural disease history and progression in real-world clinical practice. Initiated in 2010, the Gaucher Outcome Survey (GOS) is an ongoing, international, multicenter, observational registry (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03291223) for patients with a diagnosis of Gaucher disease (GD), irrespective of treatment type or status, with a primary objective to monitor safety and long-term effectiveness of velaglucerase alfa. Methods: Here, we evaluated the GOS population 12 years after the registry initiation. Results: As of 25 February 2023, 2084 patients enrolled in the GOS and 1643 received GD-specific treatment. Patients exhibited broad heterogeneity at baseline: age of diagnosis (0 to 85.3 years), hemoglobin concentrations (150 g/L), platelet counts (450 × 109/L), and liver and spleen volumes. Most patients treated with enzyme replacement therapy or substrate reduction therapy reported improvements in clinical parameters within 1 year of treatment initiation, maintained over the course of treatment up to 12 years, whereas untreated patients had baseline values closer to standard reference thresholds and showed stability over time. Conclusion: The 12-year data from the GOS confirm the impact of long-term treatment with GD-specific agents and offer insights into disease progression and outcomes in a real-world setting