24 research outputs found

    Reversibility of Central Nervous System Adverse Events in Course of Art

    Get PDF
    The purpose of this study is to evaluate the frequency of central nervous system adverse events (CNS-AE) on dolutegravir (DTG) and non-DTG containing ART, and their reversibility, in the observational prospective SCOLTA cohort. Factors associated with CNS-AE were estimated using a Cox proportional-hazards model. 4939 people living with HIV (PLWH) were enrolled in DTG (n = 1179) and non-DTG (n = 3760) cohorts. Sixty-six SNC-AE leading to ART discontinuation were reported, 39/1179 (3.3%) in DTG and 27/3760 (0.7%) in non-DTG cohort. PLWH naive to ART, with higher CD4 + T count and with psychiatric disorders were more likely to develop a CNS-AE. The risk was lower in non-DTG than DTG-cohort (aHR 0.33, 95% CI 0.19-0.55, p < 0.0001). One-year follow-up was available for 63/66 PLWH with CNS-AE. AE resolution was reported in 35/39 and 23/24 cases in DTG and non-DTG cohorts, respectively. The probability of AE reversibility was not different based on ART class, sex, ethnicity, CDC stage, or baseline psychiatric disorder. At the same time, a lower rate of event resolution was found in PLWH older than 50 years (p = 0.017). In conclusion, CNS-AE leading to ART discontinuation was more frequent in DTG than non-DTG treated PLWH. Most CNS-AE resolved after ART switch, similarly in both DTG and non-DTG cohorts

    Growing old with antiretroviral therapy or elderly people in antiretroviral therapy: two different profiles of comorbidity?

    Get PDF
    Background In persons living with HIV (PLWH), the burden of non-communicable chronic diseases increased over time, because of aging associated with chronic inflammation, systemic immune activation, and long-term exposure to the combination antiretroviral therapy (ART). Methods To explore the association of chronological age, age at first ART, and exposure to ART with non-communicable chronic diseases, we performed a cross-sectional analysis to evaluate the prevalence of comorbidities in patients enrolled in the SCOLTA Project, stratified by groups of chronological age (50-59 and 60-69 years) and by years of antiretroviral treatment (ART, <= 3 or > 3 years). Results In 1394 subjects (23.8% women), mean age at enrollment was 57.4 (SD 6.5) years, and at first ART 45.3 (SD 10.7). Men were older than women both at enrollment (57.6 vs 56.8, p = 0.06) and at first ART (45.8 vs 43.6, p = 0.0009). ART duration was longer in women (13.1 vs 11.7 years, p = 0.01). The age- and sex-adjusted rate ratios (aRRs, and 95% confidence interval, CI) showed that longer ART exposure was associated with dyslipidemia (aRR 1.35, 95% CI 1.20-1.52), hypertension (aRR 1.52, 95% CI 1.22-1.89), liver disease (aRR 1.78, 95% CI 1.32-2.41), osteopenia/osteoporosis (aRR 2.88, 95% CI 1.65-5.03) and multimorbidity (aRR 1.36, 95% CI 1.21-1.54). These findings were confirmed in strata of age, adjusting for sex. Conclusions Our data suggest that longer ART exposure was associated with increased risk of dyslipidemia, hypertension, and osteopenia/osteoporosis, hence the presence of multimorbidity, possibly due to the exposition to more toxic antiretrovirals. We observed different comorbidities, according to ART exposure and age

    Different approaches for bladder neck dissection during robot-assisted radical prostatectomy: the Aalst technique

    Get PDF
    ABSTRACT Introduction: Bladder neck dissection is one of the most delicate surgical steps of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) [1, 2], and it may affect surgical margins rate and functional outcomes [3, 4]. Given the relationship between outcomes and surgical experience [5–7], it is crucial to implement a step-by-step approach for each surgical step of the procedure, especially in the most challenging part of the intervention. In this video compilation, we described the techniques for bladder neck dissection utilized at OLV Hospital (Aalst, Belgium). Surgical Technique: We illustrated five different techniques for bladder neck dissection during RARP. The anterior technique tackles the bladder neck from above until the urethral catheter is visualized, and then the dissection is completed posteriorly. The lateral and postero-lateral approaches involve the identification of a weakness point at the prostate-vesical junction and aim to develop the posterior plane – virtually until the seminal vesicles – prior to the opening of the urethra anteriorly. Finally, we described our techniques for bladder neck dissection in more challenging cases such as in patients with bulky middle lobes and prior surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia. All approaches follow anatomic landmarks to minimize positive surgical margins and aim to preserve the bladder neck in order to promote optimal functional recovery. All procedures were performed with DaVinci robotic platforms using a 3-instruments configuration (scissors, fenestrated bipolar, and needle driver). As standard protocol at our Institution, urinary catheter was removed on postoperative day two [8]. Conclusions: Five different approaches for bladder neck dissection during RARP were described in this video compilation. We believe that the technical details provided here might be of help for clinicians who are starting their practice with this surgical intervention

    Virological and immunological monitoring of the four groups of solid-organ transplant recipients with or without HCMV infection reactivation.

    No full text
    <p>NA, not applicable.</p>1<p>Follow-up.</p>2<p>Patients of this group showed HCMV specific CD8<sup>+</sup> only, until about 3 months after transplantation, then developed HCMV-specific CD4<sup>+</sup> T-cells.</p>3<p>In some cases, clinicians preferred initiating antiviral therapy after reaching 100,000 (instead of 300,000) DNA copies/ml blood due to presence of end-organ disease.</p><p>Virological and immunological monitoring of the four groups of solid-organ transplant recipients with or without HCMV infection reactivation.</p

    Comparison of (A) HCMV-specific and (B) total T-cells/µl in group 4 non-protected patients <b><i>vs</i></b><b> groups 1+2+3 protected patients.</b>

    No full text
    <p>While both total and HCMV-specific CD4<sup>+</sup> T-cells are significantly higher in protected patients, no difference is observed between protected and non-protected patients for both total and specific CD8<sup>+</sup> T-cells.</p
    corecore