Circulating Lymphocyte Counts Early During Radiotherapy are Associated with Recurrence in Pediatric Medulloblastoma

Background Decreased peripheral lymphocyte counts are associated with outcome after RT in several solid tumors, though appear late during or after the radiation course and often correlate with other clinical factors. Here we investigate if absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) are independently associated with recurrence in pediatric medulloblastoma early during RT. Methods We assessed 202 medulloblastoma patients treated between 2000 and 2016 and analyzed ALC throughout therapy, focusing on both early markers (ALC during week 1 – ALC wk1; grade 3+ Lymphopenia during week 2 – Lymphopenia wk2) and late markers (ALC nadir). Uni- and multivariable regressions were used to assess association of clinical and treatment variables with ALC and of ALC with recurrence. Results Thirty-six recurrences were observed, with a median time to recurrence of 1.6 years (Range 0.2-10.3) and 7.1 years median follow-up. ALC during RT was associated with induction chemotherapy (p<0.001), concurrent carboplatin (p=0.009), age (p=0.01) and high-risk status (p=0.05). On univariable analysis, high-risk disease (HR 2.0[1.06–3.9],p=0.03) and M stage≥1 (HR 2.2[1.1–4.4]) were associated with recurrence risk, as was lower ALC early during RT (ALC wk1 HR 0.28[0.12–0.65],p=0.003; Lymphopenia wk2 HR 2.27[1.1-4.6],p=0.02). Neither baseline ALC nor nadir correlated with outcome. These associations persisted when excluding carboplatin and pre-RT chemotherapy patients, and in the multivariable analysis accounting for confounders lymphocyte counts remain significant (ALC wk1 HR 0.23[0.09–0.57],p=0.002; Lymphopenia wk2 HR 2.3[1.1–4.8],p=0.03). Conclusion ALC during weeks 1 and 2 of RT was associated with recurrence and low ALC is an independent prognostic factor in medulloblastoma. Strategies to mitigate the risk of radiation-induced lymphopenia should be considered

An Update From the Pediatric Proton Consortium Registry

Background/objectives The Pediatric Proton Consortium Registry (PPCR) was established to expedite proton outcomes research in the pediatric population requiring radiotherapy. Here, we introduce the PPCR as a resource to the oncology community and provide an overview of the data available for further study and collaboration. Design/methods A multi-institutional registry of integrated clinical, dosimetric, radiographic, and patient-reported data for patients undergoing proton radiation therapy was conceived in May 2010. Massachusetts General Hospital began enrollment in July of 2012. Subsequently, 12 other institutions joined the PPCR and activated patient accrual, with the latest joining in 2017. An optional patient-reported quality of life (QoL) survey is currently implemented at six institutions. Baseline health status, symptoms, medications, neurocognitive status, audiogram findings, and neuroendocrine testing are collected. Treatment details of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy are documented and radiation plans are archived. Follow-up is collected annually. Data were analyzed 25 September, 2017. Results: A total of 1,854 patients have consented and enrolled in the PPCR from October 2012 until September 2017. The cohort is 55% male, 70% Caucasian, and comprised of 79% United States residents. Central nervous system (CNS) tumors comprise 61% of the cohort. The most common CNS histologies are as follows: medulloblastoma (n = 276), ependymoma (n = 214), glioma/astrocytoma (n = 195), craniopharyngioma (n = 153), and germ cell tumors (n = 108). The most common non-CNS tumors diagnoses are as follows: rhabdomyosarcoma (n = 191), Ewing sarcoma (n = 105), Hodgkin lymphoma (n = 66), and neuroblastoma (n = 55). The median follow-up is 1.5 years with a range of 0.14 to 4.6 years. Conclusion: A large prospective population of children irradiated with proton therapy has reached a critical milestone to facilitate long-awaited clinical outcomes research in the modern era. This is an important resource for investigators both in the consortium and for those who wish to access the data for academic research pursuits

Evolution of Proton Radiotherapy Brainstem Constraints on the Pediatric Proton/Photon Consortium Registry.

INTRODUCTION Increasing concern that brainstem toxicity incidence after proton radiotherapy (PRT) might be higher than with photons led to a 2014 XXXX (XX) landmark paper identifying its risk factors and proposing more conservative dose constraints. We evaluated how practice patterns changed among the XXXX (XXXX). METHODS This prospective multicenter cohort study gathered data from patients under age 22 enrolled on the XXXX, treated between 2002-2019 for primary posterior fossa brain tumors. After standardizing brainstem contours, we garnered dosimetry data and correlated those meeting the 2014 proton-specific brainstem constraint guidelines by treatment era, histology, and extent of surgical resection. RESULTS A total of 467 patients with evaluable PRT plans were reviewed. Median age was 7.1 years (range: <1-21.9), 63.0% (n=296) were male, 76.0% (n=357) were white, and predominant histologies were medulloblastoma (55.0%, n=256) followed by ependymoma (27.0%, n=125). Extent of resection was mainly gross total resection (GTR) (67.0%, n=312), followed by subtotal resection (STR) or biopsy (20.0%, n=92). The XX brainstem constraint metrics most often exceeded were the goal D50% of 52.4 GyRBE (43.3%, n=202) and maximal D50% of 54 GyRBE (12.6%, n=59). The compliance rate increased after the new guidelines (2002-2014: 64.0% vs. 2015-2019: 74.6%, p=0.02), except for ependymoma (46.3% pre vs. 50.0% post guidelines, p=0.86), presenting lower compliance (48.8%) in comparison to medulloblastoma/PNET/pineoblastoma (77.7%), glioma (89.1%), and ATRT (90.9%) (p<0.001). Degree of surgical resection did not affect compliance rates (GTR/NTR 71.0% vs. STR/biopsy 72.8%, p=0.45), even within the ependymoma subset (GTR/NTR 50.5% vs. STR/biopsy 38.1%, p=0.82). CONCLUSION Since the publication of the XX guidelines, the pediatric proton community has implemented more conservative brainstem constraints in all patients except those with ependymoma, irrespective of residual disease after surgery. Future work will evaluate if this change in practice is associated with decreased rates of brainstem toxicity

Cancer Informatics for Cancer Centers: Scientific Drivers for Informatics, Data Science, and Care in Pediatric, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer

Cancer Informatics for Cancer Centers (CI4CC) is a grassroots, nonprofit 501c3 organization intended to provide a focused national forum for engagement of senior cancer informatics leaders, primarily aimed at academic cancer centers anywhere in the world but with a special emphasis on the 70 National Cancer Institute-funded cancer centers. This consortium has regularly held topic-focused biannual face-to-face symposiums. These meetings are a place to review cancer informatics and data science priorities and initiatives, providing a forum for discussion of the strategic and pragmatic issues that we faced at our respective institutions and cancer centers. Here, we provide meeting highlights from the latest CI4CC Symposium, which was delayed from its original April 2020 schedule because of the COVID-19 pandemic and held virtually over three days (September 24, October 1, and October 8) in the fall of 2020. In addition to the content presented, we found that holding this event virtually once a week for 6 hours was a great way to keep the kind of deep engagement that a face-to-face meeting engenders. This is the second such publication of CI4CC Symposium highlights, the first covering the meeting that took place in Napa, California, from October 14-16, 2019. We conclude with some thoughts about using data science to learn from every child with cancer, focusing on emerging activities of the National Cancer Institute\u27s Childhood Cancer Data Initiative

The Pediatric Proton and Photon Therapy Comparison Cohort: Study Design for a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort to Investigate Subsequent Cancers After Pediatric Radiation Therapy

Purpose: The physical properties of protons lower doses to surrounding normal tissues compared with photons, potentially reducing acute and long-term adverse effects, including subsequent cancers. The magnitude of benefit is uncertain, however, and currently based largely on modeling studies. Despite the paucity of directly comparative data, the number of proton centers and patients are expanding exponentially. Direct studies of the potential risks and benefits are needed in children, who have the highest risk of radiation-related subsequent cancers. The Pediatric Proton and Photon Therapy Comparison Cohort aims to meet this need. Methods and Materials: We are developing a record-linkage cohort of 10,000 proton and 10,000 photon therapy patients treated from 2007 to 2022 in the United States and Canada for pediatric central nervous system tumors, sarcomas, Hodgkin lymphoma, or neuroblastoma, the pediatric tumors most frequently treated with protons. Exposure assessment will be based on state-of-the-art dosimetry facilitated by collection of electronic radiation records for all eligible patients. Subsequent cancers and mortality will be ascertained by linkage to state and provincial cancer registries in the United States and Canada, respectively. The primary analysis will examine subsequent cancer risk after proton therapy compared with photon therapy, adjusting for potential confounders and accounting for competing risks. Results: For the primary aim comparing overall subsequent cancer rates between proton and photon therapy, we estimated that with 10,000 patients in each treatment group there would be 80% power to detect a relative risk of 0.8 assuming a cumulative incidence of subsequent cancers of 2.5% by 15 years after diagnosis. To date, 9 institutions have joined the cohort and initiated data collection; additional centers will be added in the coming year(s). Conclusions: Our findings will affect clinical practice for pediatric patients with cancer by providing the first large-scale systematic comparison of the risk of subsequent cancers from proton compared with photon therapy