Electroweak chiral Lagrangians and the Higgs properties at the one-loop level

In these proceedings we explore the use of (non-linear) electroweak chiral Lagrangians for the description of possible beyond the Standard Model strong dynamics in the electroweak sector. Experimentally one observes an approximate electroweak symmetry breaking pattern $SU(2)_L\times SU(2)_R/SU(2)_{L+R}$. Quantum Chromodynamics shows a similar chiral structure and, in spite of the differences (in the electroweak theory $SU(2)_L\times U(1)_Y$ is gauged), it has served for years as a guide for this type of studies. Examples of one-loop computations in the low-energy effective theory and the theory including the first vector and axial-vector resonances are provided, yielding, respectively, predictions for $\gamma\gamma\to Z_LZ_L,W^+_LW^-_L$ and the oblique parameters $S$ and $T$.Comment: 6 pages, 2 eps figures. Proceedings of the 7th Edition of the International Workshop on Quantum Chromodynamics -QCD@Work: Interantional Workshop on QCD, Theory and Experiment- (16-19 June 2014, Giovinazzo, Italy

One loop predictions for the pion VFF in Resonance Chiral Theory

A calculation for the one-loop pion vector form-factor in Resonance Chiral Theory is provided in this talk. The amplitude is computed up to next-to-leading order in 1/Nc and, by means of high-energy constraints, we are able to produce a prediction for the corresponding O(p4) Chiral Perturbation Theory low energy constant L9(mu)=(7.6+- 0.6) 10^{-3} at the scale mu=770 MeV.Comment: 6 pages. Talk given at QCD@Work 2010 -International Workshop on QCD: Theory and Experiment-, 20-23 June 2010, Martina Franca, Valle d'Itria (Italy

Rho Meson Properties in the Chiral Theory Framework

We study the mass, width and couplings of the lightest resonance multiplet with I(J^{PC})=1(1^{--}) quantum numbers. Effective field theories based on chiral symmetry are employed in order to describe the form factor associated with the two-pseudoscalar matrix element of the QCD vector current. The bare poles of the intermediate resonances are regularized through a Dyson-Schwinger-like summation. We explore the role of the resonance width in physical observables and make a coupled-channel analysis of final-state interactions. This provides many interesting properties, as the pole mass M_rho{pole}= 764.1 +- 2.7 +4.0-2.5 MeV. At energies E~1 GeV, a second 1(1^{--}) resonance multiplet is considered in order to describe the data in a more consistent way. From the phenomenologically extracted resonance couplings, we obtain the chiral coupling L_9^r(mu0)= (7.04 +- 0.05 +0.19-0.27)* 10^{-3}, at mu0=770$ MeV, and show how the running with the scale mu affects the resonance parameters. A 1/N_C counting is adopted in this work and the consistency of the large--N_C expansion is tested. Finally, we make an estimation of the contribution from diagrams with resonances in crossed channels.Comment: 26 pages, 8 figures, Latex fil

Pi pi scattering lengths at O(p^6) revisited

This article completes a former work where part of the O(p^6) low-energy constants entering in the pi pi scattering were estimated. Some resonance contributions were missed in former calculations and slight differences appeared with respect to our outcome. Here, we provide the full results for all the contributing O(p^6) couplings. We also perform a reanalysis of the hadronic inputs used for the estimation (resonance masses, widths...). Their reliability was checked together with the impact of the input uncertainties on the determinations of the chiral couplings and the scattering lengths a^I_J. Our outcome is found in agreement with former works though with slightly larger errors. However, the effect in the final values of the a^I_J is negligible after combining them with the other uncertainties. Based on this consistency, we conclude that the previous scattering length determinations seem to be rather solid and reliable, with the cO(p^6) low-energy constants quite under control. Nevertheless, the uncertainties found in the present work point out the limitation on further improvements unless the precision of the O(p^6) couplings is properly increased.Comment: 19 pages. Improved treatment of the a0 decay width and update of the numerical outcomes. Final version published in Phys. Rev. D (10.1103/PhysRevD.79.096006