Early lenalidomide treatment for low and intermediate-1 International Prognostic Scoring System risk myelodysplastic syndromes with del(5q) before transfusion dependence

Lenalidomide is approved for the treatment of transfusion-dependent (TD) del(5q) myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). However, few data are available in patients with transfusion-independent (TI) del(5q) MDS. In the first, observational, part of this 2-part study, we assessed the impact of transfusion dependence on overall survival (OS) and non-leukemic death in untreated del(5q) MDS patients who were TD (n = 136),TI with hemoglobin (Hb) >= 10 mg/dL (n = 88),or TI with Hb = 10 g/dL],108 months;TI [Hb <10 g/dL],77 months;TD, 44 months). Transfusion dependence also negatively impacted non-leukemic death rates. In the interventional part of the study, baseline Hb levels were found to correlate significantly with physical (R = 0.666, P = 0.035) and fatigue (R = 0.604, P = 0.049) QoL scores. Median physical QoL scores improved significantly after 12 weeks' treatment with lenalidomide (+12.5;P = 0.020). Evaluable TI patients experienced early increases in Hb levels, and all attained an erythroid response. Our findings suggest that TI patients with moderate anemia may benefit from early treatment with lenalidomide

Effects of robotic upper limb treatment after stroke on cognitive patterns: A systematic review

Background: Robotic therapy (RT) has been internationally recognized for the motor rehabilitation of the upper limb. Although it seems that RT can stimulate and promote neuroplasticity, the effectiveness of robotics in restoring cognitive deficits has been considered only in a few recent studies. Objective: To verify whether, in the current state of the literature, cognitive measures are used as inclusion or exclusion criteria and/or outcomes measures in robotic upper limb rehabilitation in stroke patients. Methods: The systematic review was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies eligible were identified through PubMed/MEDLINE and Web of Science from inception to March 2021. Results: Eighty-one studies were considered in this systematic review. Seventy-three studies have at least a cognitive inclusion or exclusion criteria, while only seven studies assessed cognitive outcomes. Conclusion: Despite the high presence of cognitive instruments used for inclusion/exclusion criteria their heterogeneity did not allow the identification of a guideline for the evaluation of patients in different stroke stages. Therefore, although the heterogeneity and the low percentage of studies that included cognitive outcomes, seemed that the latter were positively influenced by RT in post-stroke rehabilitation. Future larger RCTs are needed to outline which cognitive scales are most suitable and their cut-off, as well as what cognitive outcome measures to use in the various stages of post-stroke rehabilitation

Eltrombopag versus placebo for low-risk myelodysplastic syndromes with thrombocytopenia (EQoL-MDS): phase 1 results of a single-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2 superiority trial

Background In myelodysplastic syndromes, thrombocytopenia is associated with mortality, but treatments in this setting are scarce. We tested whether eltrombopag, a thrombopoietin receptor agonist, might be effective in improving thrombocytopenia in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and severe thrombocytopenia. Methods EQoL-MDS was a single-blind, randomised, controlled, phase 2 superiority trial of adult patients with low-risk or International Prognostic Scoring System intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and severe thrombocytopenia. Patients with a stable platelet count of lower than 30 × 109 platelets per L, aged at least 18 years, with refractoriness, ineligibility to receive treatment with alternative medications, or relapse while receiving treatment with alternative medications were included in this trial. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive eltrombopag (50 mg to 300 mg) or placebo for at least 24 weeks and until disease progression and were masked to treatment allocation. Here, we report the results in the intention-to-treat population of the first phase of the trial, for which the primary endpoints were the proportion of patients achieving a platelet response within 24 weeks and safety. The interim analysis presented here was protocol-specified and used a two-sided significance level of 0·001 and a p value at or below this limit for both primary endpoints to indicate the need for early trial termination. Duration of platelet transfusion independence, duration of response, overall survival, leukaemia-free survival, and pharmacokinetics will be reported at the end of the phase 2 portion of the trial. This trial is registered with EudraCT, number 2010-022890-33. Findings Between June 13, 2011, and June 17, 2016, we enrolled 90 participants for the first phase of the trial. The median follow-up time to assess platelet responses was 11 weeks (IQR 4–24). Platelet responses occurred in 28 (47%) of 59 patients in the eltrombopag group versus one (3%) of 31 patients in the placebo group (odds ratio 27·1 [95% CI 3·5–211·9], p=0·0017). During the follow-up, 21 patients had at least one severe bleeding event (WHO bleeding score ≥2). There were a higher number of bleeders in the placebo (13 [42%] of 31 patients) than in the eltrombopag arm (eight [14%] of 59 patients; p=0·0025). 52 grade 3–4 adverse events occurred in 27 (46%) of 59 patients in the eltrombopag group versus nine events in five (16%) of 31 patients in the placebo group (χ2=7·8, p=0·0053, stopping rule not reached). The outcome acute myeloid leukaemia evolution or disease progression occurred in seven (12%) of 59 patients in the eltrombopag group versus five (16%) of 31 patients in the placebo group (χ2=0·06, p=0·81). Interpretation Eltrombopag is well-tolerated in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes and severe thrombocytopenia and is clinically effective in raising platelet counts and reducing bleeding events. The assessment of long-term safety and efficacy of eltrombopag and its effect on survival (phase 2 part of study) is still ongoing. Funding Associazione QOL-ONE

Eltrombopag for the Treatment of Thrombocytopenia of Low and Intermediate-1 IPSS Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes: Interim Results on Efficacy, Safety and Quality of Life of an International, Multicenter Prospective, Randomized, Trial

Background: About 10% of low risk patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) experience severe thrombocytopenia. Bleeding and the scarce efficacy of platelet (PLT) transfusions drive research in novel treatments. Eltrombopag is an oral agonist of the thrombopoetin-receptor (TPO-R). Its potential in increasing platelet (PLT) counts in low risk MDS has not been evaluated. We present interim results on the efficacy and safety of eltrombopag in inducing PLT responses in patients with low and intermediate-1 International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) risk MDS with severe thrombocytopenia in a Phase II, multicentre, prospective, placebo-controlled, single-blind study (EQoL-MDS). Methods: Primary endpoints are safety and efficacy of eltrombopag. Secondary endpoints include changes in quality of life (QoL), PLT transfusion requirement, incidence and severity of bleeding, and survival. Inclusion criteria are adult age; PLT200 Gi/L or adverse events. Study design is shown in the figure. PLT response, assessed at each visit, is defined as Response if: 1) baseline PLT>20 Gi/L: absence of bleeding and increase by at least 30 Gi/L from baseline; 2) baseline PLT20 Gi/L and increase by at least 100%, not due to PLT transfusions; and Complete Response if PLT≥100 Gi/L and absence of bleeding. QoL scores are analysed by MDS-specific instrument, QOL-E v. 3. Results: Seventy patients (46 on eltrombopag - Arm A, 24 on placebo -Arm B) have been randomized at the time of this report. Mean age is 68.3 (SD 13.0) years, M/F 38/32. ECOG performance status was 0 in 47 cases, 1 in 16 cases, 2 in 7 cases. Ten patients had comorbidities. According to the WHO 2008 classification, 22 patients had refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia, 9 had refractory anemia with ringed sideroblasts, 31 had refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia (of which 15 with ringed sideroblasts), 6 had refractory anemia with excess blasts-1 and 2 were unclassified. IPSS score was low in 48 cases. Mean baseline platelet (PLT) count was 17.1 (SD 8.2) Gi/L, mean hemoglobin level 10.8 (SD 2.5) g/dL and mean white blood cell count was 5.0 (SD 3.8) Gi/L. Twenty-five (36%) patients were red blood cell transfusion-dependent. Thirty-three had a WHO bleeding scale of 1, 2 experienced mild blood loss, 4 a gross blood loss and 1 a debilitating blood loss. Fourteen patients in Arm A and 8 in Arm B had required PLT transfusions in the 8 weeks prior to randomization. Twenty-three cases (50%) in Arm A have responded versus 2 (8%) in Arm B (p=0.001). Thirty-three patients have completed at least 24 weeks of study. Median time to response was 14 days (IQR 7-46 days) at a median daily dose of 75 (IQR 50-162.5 mg). PLT count increased by mean 53.2 (SD 68.1) Gi/L (p=0.001) in Arm A versus no significant changes in Arm B by week 24. QOL-E scores at baseline and 12 weeks in 47 cases in both arms are shown in the table. There was an increase in treatment outcome index,mainly experienced in the first 3 weeks (p=0.034). Fatigue improved from baseline to 12 weeks associated with response (p=0.016). Related Grade III-IV adverse events (AE) occurred in 10 patients (22%) in Arm A and consisted in: nausea (4), hypertransaminasemia (3), hyperbilirubinemia (1), sepsis (1), pruritis (1), heart failure (1), asthenia (1), vomit (1), while in Arm B 1 patient (4 %) experienced grade 3 bone marrow fibrosis. MDS disease progression occurred in 5 (11%) in Arm A versus 2 (8%) in Arm B, p=ns. Conclusions: Preliminary data indicate that lower risk MDS patients with severe thrombocytopenia undergoing treatment with eltrombopag experience significant improvements in PLT counts accompanied by improvements in fatigue. The drug appears to be well-tolerated and not associated with MDS progression. Further follow-up is required to evaluate the impact on survival

Robot-assisted arm therapy in neurological health conditions: rationale and methodology for the evidence synthesis in the CICERONE Italian Consensus Conference

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted Arm Therapy (RAT) has been increasingly applied in the last years for promoting functional recovery in patients with disabilities related to neurological health conditions. Evidence of a knowledge-to-action gap for applying robot-assisted technologies in the rehabilitation of patients with neurological health conditions and the difficulty to apply and tailor the knowledge to the local contexts solicited the need for a national consensus conference on these interventions. AIM: This paper aims to explain the methodology used by the working group dedicated to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of RAT in neurological health conditions in the context of the CICERONE Italian Consensus Conference. DESIGN: The methodological approach of the working group. SETTING: All rehabilitation settings. POPULATION: Patients with disability following a neurological health condition. METHODS: Following the indications proposed by the Methodological Manual published by the Italian National Institute of Health, a Promoting Committee and a Technical Scientific Committee have been set up. Six working groups (WGs) have been composed to collect evidence on different questions, among which WG2.2 was focused on the effectiveness of RAT in neurological health conditions. RESULTS: WG2.2 started its work defining the specific research questions. It was decided to adopt the ICF as the reference framework for the reporting of all outcomes. Literature search, data extraction and qualitative assessment, evidence analysis and synthesis have been performed. CONCLUSIONS: This paper summarizes the methodological approaches used by the WG2.2 of the CICERONE Italian Consensus Conference to define the effectiveness of RAT in the management of patients with neurological health conditions. CLINICAL REHABILITATION IMPACT: WG2.2 synthesis might help clinicians, researchers, and all rehabilitation stakeholders to address the use of RAT in the Individualized Rehabilitation Plan, to guide the allocation of resources and define clinical protocols and indications for the management of patients with different neurological health conditions

Emotional status and fear in patients scheduled for elective surgery during COVID-19 pandemic: a nationwide cross-sectional survey (COVID-SURGERY)

Background Fragmented data exist on the emotional and psychological distress generated by hospital admission during the pandemic in specific populations of patients, and no data exists on patients scheduled for surgery. The aim of this multicentre nationwide prospective cross-sectional survey was to evaluate the impact of pandemic on emotional status and fear of SARS-CoV-2 contagion in a cohort of elective surgical patients in Italy, scheduled for surgery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Results Twenty-nine Italian centres were involved in the study, for a total of 2376 patients surveyed (mean age of 58 years ± 16.61; 49.6% males). The survey consisted of 28 total closed questions, including four study outcome questions. More than half of patients had at least one chronic disease (54%), among which cardiovascular diseases were the commonest (58%). The most frequent type of surgery was abdominal (20%), under general anaesthesia (64%). Almost half of the patients (46%) declared to be frightened of going to the hospital for routine checkups; 55% to be afraid of getting SARS-CoV-2 infection during hospitalization and 62% were feared of being hospitalised without seeing family members. Having an oncological disease and other patient-related, centre-related or perioperative factors were independently associated with an increased risk of fear of SARS-CoV-2 infection during hospitalization and of being hospitalised without seeing family members. A previous infection due to SARS-COV-2 was associated with a reduced risk of worse emotional outcomes and fear of SARS-CoV-2 infection during hospitalization. Patients who showed the most emotionally vulnerable profile (e.g. use of sleep-inducing drugs, higher fear of surgery or anaesthesia) were at higher risk of worse emotional status towards the hospitalization during COVID-19 pandemic. Being operated in hospitals with lower surgical volume and with COVID-19 wards was associated with worse emotional status and fear of contagion. Conclusions Additional fear and worse emotional status may be frequent in patients scheduled for elective surgery during COVID-19 pandemic. More than half of the participants to the survey were worried about not being able to receive family visits. Psychological support may be considered for patients at higher risk of psychological distress to improve perioperative wellbeing during the pandemic