Retrograde cardioplegia preserves myocardial function after induced coronary air embolism

AbstractCoronary air embolism is a potential complication of cardiopulmonary bypass. We compared left ventricular function before and after the administration of antegrade or retrograde cardioplegic solution in a porcine model of coronary air embolism. Nineteen pigs were placed on cardiopulmonary bypass support and cooled to 32° C. The heart was initially arrested with antegrade cold blood cardioplegic solution. The aortic crossclamp was released at 30 minutes and 0.02 cc/kg body weight of air was injected into the left anterior descending artery distal to the first diagonal branch. After 5 minutes the aorta was reclamped and the animals treated with 15 ml/kg body weight of 1:4 blood cardioplegic solution delivered by the antegrade (n = 6) or retrograde (n = 7) method. Control animals (n = 6) were not treated. Changes in regional preload recruitable stroke work were used to assess left ventricular performance before and after cardiopulmonary bypass. Two control animals could not be weaned from cardiopulmonary bypass. Left ventricular function was best preserved after treatment of induced coronary air embolism with retrograde cardioplegia (90% of baseline). Coronary air embolism treatment with antegrade cardioplegia resulted in diminished left ventricular performance (68% of baseline). In control animals left ventricular contractility was significantly impaired (39% of baseline). We conclude that administration of retrograde cardioplegic solution may be an effective method of treating coronary air embolism. The favorable outcome seen with cardioplegia may be in part because of its ability to protect the ischemic myocardium while the solution mechanically dislodges air from the vascular bed. (J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;113:917-22

Impact of opioid-free analgesia on pain severity and patient satisfaction after discharge from surgery: multispecialty, prospective cohort study in 25 countries

Background: Balancing opioid stewardship and the need for adequate analgesia following discharge after surgery is challenging. This study aimed to compare the outcomes for patients discharged with opioid versus opioid-free analgesia after common surgical procedures.Methods: This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study collected data from patients undergoing common acute and elective general surgical, urological, gynaecological, and orthopaedic procedures. The primary outcomes were patient-reported time in severe pain measured on a numerical analogue scale from 0 to 100% and patient-reported satisfaction with pain relief during the first week following discharge. Data were collected by in-hospital chart review and patient telephone interview 1 week after discharge.Results: The study recruited 4273 patients from 144 centres in 25 countries; 1311 patients (30.7%) were prescribed opioid analgesia at discharge. Patients reported being in severe pain for 10 (i.q.r. 1-30)% of the first week after discharge and rated satisfaction with analgesia as 90 (i.q.r. 80-100) of 100. After adjustment for confounders, opioid analgesia on discharge was independently associated with increased pain severity (risk ratio 1.52, 95% c.i. 1.31 to 1.76; P < 0.001) and re-presentation to healthcare providers owing to side-effects of medication (OR 2.38, 95% c.i. 1.36 to 4.17; P = 0.004), but not with satisfaction with analgesia (beta coefficient 0.92, 95% c.i. -1.52 to 3.36; P = 0.468) compared with opioid-free analgesia. Although opioid prescribing varied greatly between high-income and low- and middle-income countries, patient-reported outcomes did not.Conclusion: Opioid analgesia prescription on surgical discharge is associated with a higher risk of re-presentation owing to side-effects of medication and increased patient-reported pain, but not with changes in patient-reported satisfaction. Opioid-free discharge analgesia should be adopted routinely