11 research outputs found

    Post-replicative pairing of sister ter regions in Escherichia coli involves multiple activities of MatP

    Get PDF
    Funder: Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (University of Toulouse III Paul Sabatier); doi: https://doi.org/10.13039/501100009160Abstract: The ter region of the bacterial chromosome, where replication terminates, is the last to be segregated before cell division in Escherichia coli. Delayed segregation is controlled by the MatP protein, which binds to specific sites (matS) within ter, and interacts with other proteins such as ZapB. Here, we investigate the role of MatP by combining short-time mobility analyses of the ter locus with biochemical approaches. We find that ter mobility is similar to that of a non ter locus, except when sister ter loci are paired after replication. This effect depends on MatP, the persistence of catenanes, and ZapB. We characterise MatP/DNA complexes and conclude that MatP binds DNA as a tetramer, but bridging matS sites in a DNA-rich environment remains infrequent. We propose that tetramerisation of MatP links matS sites with ZapB and/or with non-specific DNA to promote optimal pairing of sister ter regions until cell division

    Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor and angiotensin receptor blocker initiation on organ support-free days in patients hospitalized with COVID-19

    Get PDF
    IMPORTANCE Overactivation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) may contribute to poor clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Objective To determine whether angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) initiation improves outcomes in patients hospitalized for COVID-19. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In an ongoing, adaptive platform randomized clinical trial, 721 critically ill and 58 non–critically ill hospitalized adults were randomized to receive an RAS inhibitor or control between March 16, 2021, and February 25, 2022, at 69 sites in 7 countries (final follow-up on June 1, 2022). INTERVENTIONS Patients were randomized to receive open-label initiation of an ACE inhibitor (n = 257), ARB (n = 248), ARB in combination with DMX-200 (a chemokine receptor-2 inhibitor; n = 10), or no RAS inhibitor (control; n = 264) for up to 10 days. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was organ support–free days, a composite of hospital survival and days alive without cardiovascular or respiratory organ support through 21 days. The primary analysis was a bayesian cumulative logistic model. Odds ratios (ORs) greater than 1 represent improved outcomes. RESULTS On February 25, 2022, enrollment was discontinued due to safety concerns. Among 679 critically ill patients with available primary outcome data, the median age was 56 years and 239 participants (35.2%) were women. Median (IQR) organ support–free days among critically ill patients was 10 (–1 to 16) in the ACE inhibitor group (n = 231), 8 (–1 to 17) in the ARB group (n = 217), and 12 (0 to 17) in the control group (n = 231) (median adjusted odds ratios of 0.77 [95% bayesian credible interval, 0.58-1.06] for improvement for ACE inhibitor and 0.76 [95% credible interval, 0.56-1.05] for ARB compared with control). The posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitors and ARBs worsened organ support–free days compared with control were 94.9% and 95.4%, respectively. Hospital survival occurred in 166 of 231 critically ill participants (71.9%) in the ACE inhibitor group, 152 of 217 (70.0%) in the ARB group, and 182 of 231 (78.8%) in the control group (posterior probabilities that ACE inhibitor and ARB worsened hospital survival compared with control were 95.3% and 98.1%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE In this trial, among critically ill adults with COVID-19, initiation of an ACE inhibitor or ARB did not improve, and likely worsened, clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT0273570

    Three ParA dimers cooperatively assemble on type Ia partition promoters

    No full text
    ABSTRACT Accurate DNA segregation is essential for faithful inheritance of genetic material. In bacteria, this process is mainly ensured by a partition system (Par) composed of two proteins, ParA and ParB, and a centromere site. The auto-regulation of Par operon expression is important for efficient partitioning, and is primarily mediated by ParA for type Ia plasmid partition systems. For the plasmid F, four ParA F monomers were proposed to bind to four repeated sequences in the promoter region. By contrast, using quantitative surface plasmon resonance, we showed that three ParA F dimers bind to this region. We uncovered that one perfect inverted repeat (IR) motif, consisting of two hexamer sequences spaced by 28-bp, constitutes the primary ParA F DNA binding site. A similar but degenerated motif overlaps the former. ParA F binding to these motifs is well supported by biochemical and modeling analyses. In addition, molecular dynamics simulations predict that the winged-HTH domain displays high flexibility, which may favor the cooperative ParA binding to the promoter region. We propose that three ParA F dimers bind cooperatively to overlapping motifs thus covering the promoter region. A similar organization is found on both closely related and distant plasmid partition systems, suggesting that such promoter organization for auto-regulated Par operons is widespread and may have evolved from a common ancestor

    Three ParA Dimers Cooperatively Assemble on Type Ia Partition Promoters

    No full text
    International audienceAccurate DNA segregation is essential for faithful inheritance of genetic material. In bacteria, this process is mainly ensured by partition systems composed of two proteins, ParA and ParB, and a centromere site. Auto-regulation of Par operon expression is important for efficient partitioning and is primarily mediated by ParA for type Ia plasmid partition systems. For the F-plasmid, four ParAF monomers were proposed to bind to four repeated sequences in the promoter region. By contrast, using quantitative surface-plasmon-resonance, we showed that three ParAF dimers bind to this region. We uncovered that one perfect inverted repeat (IR) motif, consisting of two hexamer sequences spaced by 28-bp, constitutes the primary ParAF DNA binding site. A similar but degenerated motif overlaps the former. ParAF binding to these motifs is well supported by biochemical and modeling analyses. Molecular dynamics simulations predict that the winged-HTH domain displays high flexibility, which may favor the cooperative ParA binding to the promoter. We propose that three ParAF dimers bind cooperatively to overlapping motifs, thus covering the promoter region. A similar organization is found on closely related and distant plasmid partition systems, suggesting that such promoter organization for auto-regulated Par operons is widespread and may have evolved from a common ancestor

    Acute toxicity of two pesticides (dursban, mancozeb) and their combined mixture on the terrestrial isopod Armadillidium vulgare (Oniscidea, Isopoda)

    No full text
    International audienceOur study focused on evaluating an acute toxicity test, where woodlice (Armadillidium vulgare) which is the most abandoned in our region , were exposed to pesticides (dursban and mancozeb) most used in Algeria.The concentrations of the pesticids tested are 720 mg/kg,360 mg/kg,90 mg/kg, 45 mg/kg for dursban; 800 mg/kg, 400 mg/kg, 200 mg/kg,100 mg/kg for mancozeb and 720/800 mg/kg, 360/400 mg/kg,90/200 mg/kg, 45/100 mg/kg for the mixture of dursban and mancozeb.Our results show that dursban was highly toxic (69% mortality after 28 days of the test) compared to mancozeb (19.5% mortality). On the other hand, in the case of the mixture (dursban ± mancozeb), the toxicity was lower (63% mortality) compared to the dursban tested alone. Contamination of woodlice with dursban and a mixture of dursban and mancozeb revealed morphological effects such as alteration of the marsupial cavity and expulsion of eggs from the outside of this cavity. Dursban and the mixture of dursban and mancozeb are toxic to Armadillidium vulgare, but mancozeb alone is not toxic. Dursban should be banned because it is bad for soil fauna and therefore probably for biodiversity in general and even human health
    corecore