25 research outputs found
On the metric dimension of corona product graphs
Given a set of vertices of a connected graph , the
metric representation of a vertex of with respect to is the vector
, where ,
denotes the distance between and . is a resolving set for if
for every pair of vertices of , . The metric
dimension of , , is the minimum cardinality of any resolving set for
. Let and be two graphs of order and , respectively. The
corona product is defined as the graph obtained from and by
taking one copy of and copies of and joining by an edge each
vertex from the -copy of with the -vertex of . For any
integer , we define the graph recursively from
as . We give several results on the metric
dimension of . For instance, we show that given two connected
graphs and of order and , respectively, if the
diameter of is at most two, then .
Moreover, if and the diameter of is greater than five or is
a cycle graph, then $dim(G\odot^k H)=n_1(n_2+1)^{k-1}dim(K_1\odot H).
On the partition dimension of trees
Given an ordered partition of the vertex set
of a connected graph , the \emph{partition representation} of a vertex
with respect to the partition is the vector
, where represents the
distance between the vertex and the set . A partition of is
a \emph{resolving partition} of if different vertices of have different
partition representations, i.e., for every pair of vertices ,
. The \emph{partition dimension} of is the minimum
number of sets in any resolving partition of . In this paper we obtain
several tight bounds on the partition dimension of trees
On the Metric Dimension of Cartesian Products of Graphs
A set S of vertices in a graph G resolves G if every vertex is uniquely
determined by its vector of distances to the vertices in S. The metric
dimension of G is the minimum cardinality of a resolving set of G. This paper
studies the metric dimension of cartesian products G*H. We prove that the
metric dimension of G*G is tied in a strong sense to the minimum order of a
so-called doubly resolving set in G. Using bounds on the order of doubly
resolving sets, we establish bounds on G*H for many examples of G and H. One of
our main results is a family of graphs G with bounded metric dimension for
which the metric dimension of G*G is unbounded
One size resolvability of graphs
For an ordered set W = {w1,w2, · · · ,wk} of vertices in a connected
graph G and a vertex v of G, the code of v with respect to W is the k-vector
CW(v) = (d(v,w1), d(v,w2), · · · , d(v,wk)).
The set W is a one size resolving set for G if (1) the size of subgraph hWi induced
by W is one and (2) distinct vertices of G have distinct code with respect to W.
The minimum cardinality of a one size resolving set in graph G is the one size
resolving number, denoted by or(G). A one size resolving set of cardinality or(G)
is called an or-set of G. We study the existence of or-set in graphs and characterize
all nontrivial connected graphs G of order n with or(G) = n and n − 1
Conditional resolvability in graphs: a survey
For an ordered set W={w1,w2,…,wk} of vertices and
a vertex v in a connected graph G, the code of v with
respect to W is the k-vector cW(v)=(d(v,w1),d(v,w2),…,d(v,wk)), where d(x,y) represents the distance
between the vertices x and y. The set W is a resolving set
for G if distinct vertices of G have distinct codes with
respect to W. The minimum cardinality of a resolving set for
G is its dimension dim(G). Many resolving parameters are
formed by extending resolving sets to different subjects in graph
theory, such as the partition of the vertex set, decomposition
and coloring in graphs, or by combining resolving property with
another graph-theoretic property such as being connected,
independent, or acyclic. In this paper, we survey results and
open questions on the resolving parameters defined by imposing an
additional constraint on resolving sets, resolving partitions, or
resolving decompositions in graphs
Connected resolvability of graphs
summary:For an ordered set of vertices and a vertex in a connected graph , the representation of with respect to is the -vector = (, , where represents the distance between the vertices and . The set is a resolving set for if distinct vertices of have distinct representations with respect to . A resolving set for containing a minimum number of vertices is a basis for . The dimension is the number of vertices in a basis for . A resolving set of is connected if the subgraph induced by is a nontrivial connected subgraph of . The minimum cardinality of a connected resolving set in a graph is its connected resolving number . Thus for every connected graph of order . The connected resolving numbers of some well-known graphs are determined. It is shown that if is a connected graph of order , then if and only if or . It is also shown that for positive integers , with , there exists a connected graph with and if and only if . Several other realization results are present. The connected resolving numbers of the Cartesian products for connected graphs are studied
The cardinality of endomorphisms of some oriented paths: an algorithm
An endomorphism of a (oriented) graph is a mapping on the vertex
set preserving (arcs) edges. In this paper we provide an algorithm to determine
the cardinalities of endomorphism monoids of some ( nite) directed paths, based
on results on simple paths.Chiang Mai University; CMUC - Centro de Matemática da Universidade
de Coimbra; Srinakharinwirot University; Thailand Research Fund and Commission on
Higher Education, Thailand MRG508007
ON RESOLVING EDGE COLORINGS IN GRAPHS
We study the relationships between the resolving edge chromatic number and other graphical parameters and provide bounds for the resolving edge chromatic number of a connected graph
On -labelings of oriented graphs
summary:Let be an oriented graph of order and size . A -labeling of is a one-to-one function that induces a labeling of the arcs of defined by for each arc of . The value of a -labeling is A -labeling of is balanced if the value of is 0. An oriented graph is balanced if has a balanced labeling. A graph is orientably balanced if has a balanced orientation. It is shown that a connected graph of order is orientably balanced unless is a tree, n \equiv 2 \hspace{4.44443pt}(\@mod \; 4), and every vertex of has odd degree
The independent resolving number of a graph
summary:For an ordered set of vertices in a connected graph and a vertex of , the code of with respect to is the -vector The set is an independent resolving set for if (1) is independent in and (2) distinct vertices have distinct codes with respect to . The cardinality of a minimum independent resolving set in is the independent resolving number . We study the existence of independent resolving sets in graphs, characterize all nontrivial connected graphs of order with , , , and present several realization results. It is shown that for every pair of integers with and , there exists a connected graph with such that exactly vertices belong to every minimum independent resolving set of